The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What did everyone think of Joey then?
I actually liked it, i didnt think i would after all the bad stuff i heard about it but i am definately going to watch it again next sunday.
I actually liked it, i didnt think i would after all the bad stuff i heard about it but i am definately going to watch it again next sunday.
Page:
Friends had the most continuity errors I've ever seen in anything. In one shot a character would have their arms folded, in the next they would be in a different position, then in the next shot they would be folded again. I've spotted countless errors like this.
I liked Joey - only thing that can ruin it now is a visit from Janice. They should've killed her off a very long time ago - say series four.
do you remember the 'blue blazer black' joke in Friends?
Do you think Chandler messed that line up while they were doing it and they decided to work it into the proper show?
Do you think Chandler messed that line up while they were doing it and they decided to work it into the proper show?
Reefer wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Friends immensely, but the writing is
> hardly sharp.
In the beginning, it was virtually faultless.
In the final series, it was actually quite poor.
> Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Friends immensely, but the writing is
> hardly sharp.
In the beginning, it was virtually faultless.
In the final series, it was actually quite poor.
Well, I don't think there's any problem with the writing - not judging by the first two episodes, at least. The substance in this respect was impressive, and surpassed that of the final series of Friends.
But the direction and acting is just far too weak for this to be anything special. However, this is only the beginning, so there's certainly room for improvement in these respects as the actors settle into their roles and a distinctive style for the show emerges. It exceeded my expectations, which is always nice.
Shaky on the start, but promising.
But the direction and acting is just far too weak for this to be anything special. However, this is only the beginning, so there's certainly room for improvement in these respects as the actors settle into their roles and a distinctive style for the show emerges. It exceeded my expectations, which is always nice.
Shaky on the start, but promising.
Asher wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> It wasn't quite as terrible as I was expecting. Which was nice.
>
> Although his sister must have got knocked up at about 10 years old
> to
> have a kid that old.
>
> They made a massive point/joke about her having him when she was 16,
> were you not watching? lol
>
> "It's very rare you get to hear the argument for teen
> pregnancy"
No she go's I told him I had him when I was 22!
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> It wasn't quite as terrible as I was expecting. Which was nice.
>
> Although his sister must have got knocked up at about 10 years old
> to
> have a kid that old.
>
> They made a massive point/joke about her having him when she was 16,
> were you not watching? lol
>
> "It's very rare you get to hear the argument for teen
> pregnancy"
No she go's I told him I had him when I was 22!
Asher wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> It wasn't quite as terrible as I was expecting. Which was nice.
>
> Although his sister must have got knocked up at about 10 years old
> to
> have a kid that old.
>
No she go's I told him I had him when I was 22!
> They made a massive point/joke about her having him when she was 16,
> were you not watching? lol
>
> "It's very rare you get to hear the argument for teen
> pregnancy"
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> It wasn't quite as terrible as I was expecting. Which was nice.
>
> Although his sister must have got knocked up at about 10 years old
> to
> have a kid that old.
>
No she go's I told him I had him when I was 22!
> They made a massive point/joke about her having him when she was 16,
> were you not watching? lol
>
> "It's very rare you get to hear the argument for teen
> pregnancy"
I'll catch the double bill at 11 tonight. This wont last long though, the writers will run out of ideas.
Asher wrote:
> It was just Friends, minus the other characters. Like a 30-minute
> collage of all Joey's adventures instead of changing between all the
> characters' stories. Just as potentially funny, just as sharply
> written, the only question is if Joey can hold his own without
> getting slightly boring. Which I really doubt he will.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Friends immensely, but the writing is hardly sharp.
> It was just Friends, minus the other characters. Like a 30-minute
> collage of all Joey's adventures instead of changing between all the
> characters' stories. Just as potentially funny, just as sharply
> written, the only question is if Joey can hold his own without
> getting slightly boring. Which I really doubt he will.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Friends immensely, but the writing is hardly sharp.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> It wasn't quite as terrible as I was expecting. Which was nice.
>
> Although his sister must have got knocked up at about 10 years old to
> have a kid that old.
They made a massive point/joke about her having him when she was 16, were you not watching? lol
"It's very rare you get to hear the argument for teen pregnancy"
> It wasn't quite as terrible as I was expecting. Which was nice.
>
> Although his sister must have got knocked up at about 10 years old to
> have a kid that old.
They made a massive point/joke about her having him when she was 16, were you not watching? lol
"It's very rare you get to hear the argument for teen pregnancy"
Page: