The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What did everyone think of Joey then?
I actually liked it, i didnt think i would after all the bad stuff i heard about it but i am definately going to watch it again next sunday.
I actually liked it, i didnt think i would after all the bad stuff i heard about it but i am definately going to watch it again next sunday.
Page:
Mav wrote:
> Neither Friends nor Joey are crap television programmes.
I haven't wasted my time on Joey because I detest Friends, but I doubt it will be much different.
> Neither Friends nor Joey are crap television programmes.
I haven't wasted my time on Joey because I detest Friends, but I doubt it will be much different.
Neither Friends nor Joey are crap television programmes.
Mav wrote:
> Ah right.
>
> You see, I didn't get that, because it's not ironic.
>
> Think about it - if a mistake is truly obvious, why hasn't it
> been removed? Mistakes are there because professionals have missed
> them, and if they have, they're certainly not going to be as blatent
> as you make out.
Maybe the professionals are too stupid to notice these mistakes. After all, they did make a spin off of a crap TV show.
> Ah right.
>
> You see, I didn't get that, because it's not ironic.
>
> Think about it - if a mistake is truly obvious, why hasn't it
> been removed? Mistakes are there because professionals have missed
> them, and if they have, they're certainly not going to be as blatent
> as you make out.
Maybe the professionals are too stupid to notice these mistakes. After all, they did make a spin off of a crap TV show.
Ah right.
You see, I didn't get that, because it's not ironic.
Think about it - if a mistake is truly obvious, why hasn't it been removed? Mistakes are there because professionals have missed them, and if they have, they're certainly not going to be as blatent as you make out.
You see, I didn't get that, because it's not ironic.
Think about it - if a mistake is truly obvious, why hasn't it been removed? Mistakes are there because professionals have missed them, and if they have, they're certainly not going to be as blatent as you make out.
Mav wrote:
> What?
>
> How in hell is that ironic?
I didn't think I'd have to spell it out. It is ironic because you said I was talking crap. This was followed by your stupid comment about there not being any obvious mistakes, which is most definitely talking crap.
> What?
>
> How in hell is that ironic?
I didn't think I'd have to spell it out. It is ironic because you said I was talking crap. This was followed by your stupid comment about there not being any obvious mistakes, which is most definitely talking crap.
What?
How in hell is that ironic?
How in hell is that ironic?
Mav wrote:
> Chr1s wrote:
> I wasn't being pedantic, I was just noticing the very blatant. If
> you
> can't notice these continuity errors then you really are not very
> observant, they are VERY obvious.
>
> No, you're talking crap. There's no such thing as an obvious
> mistake.
How ironic.
> Chr1s wrote:
> I wasn't being pedantic, I was just noticing the very blatant. If
> you
> can't notice these continuity errors then you really are not very
> observant, they are VERY obvious.
>
> No, you're talking crap. There's no such thing as an obvious
> mistake.
How ironic.
Chr1s wrote:
> I wasn't being pedantic, I was just noticing the very blatant. If you
> can't notice these continuity errors then you really are not very
> observant, they are VERY obvious.
No, you're talking crap. There's no such thing as an obvious mistake.
You're exagerrating and grasping at straws. First of all, as I pointed out, there simply cannot be as many continuity errors as you mention. It just can't happen. Secondly, whether or not people remember mistakes in something is absolutely no test of observation.
Unless you're one of those people who reads pages of film mistakes for fun, if you do spot an error, you won't care. You'll disregard it and keep watching, and it'll be forgotten.
> I wasn't being pedantic, I was just noticing the very blatant. If you
> can't notice these continuity errors then you really are not very
> observant, they are VERY obvious.
No, you're talking crap. There's no such thing as an obvious mistake.
You're exagerrating and grasping at straws. First of all, as I pointed out, there simply cannot be as many continuity errors as you mention. It just can't happen. Secondly, whether or not people remember mistakes in something is absolutely no test of observation.
Unless you're one of those people who reads pages of film mistakes for fun, if you do spot an error, you won't care. You'll disregard it and keep watching, and it'll be forgotten.
Mav wrote:
> Chr1s wrote:
> You're obviously not very observant then.
>
> Er, yes I am.
>
> Forgive me for doing so, but I don't watch television with the
> mindframe of Simon Cowell.
>
> You realise that Friends is filmed in front of live studio audience,
> right? You should do, it's already been mentioned, and I wouldn't
> have thought it'd get past your unparalleled skills of observation.
>
> Mistakes usually materialise inbetween cuts. In a sitcom, which is
> also a performance for people, there are very few cuts. What
> you're thinking are mistakes are most likely just the result of
> pedanticity on your part.
I wasn't being pedantic, I was just noticing the very blatant. If you can't notice these continuity errors then you really are not very observant, they are VERY obvious.
> Chr1s wrote:
> You're obviously not very observant then.
>
> Er, yes I am.
>
> Forgive me for doing so, but I don't watch television with the
> mindframe of Simon Cowell.
>
> You realise that Friends is filmed in front of live studio audience,
> right? You should do, it's already been mentioned, and I wouldn't
> have thought it'd get past your unparalleled skills of observation.
>
> Mistakes usually materialise inbetween cuts. In a sitcom, which is
> also a performance for people, there are very few cuts. What
> you're thinking are mistakes are most likely just the result of
> pedanticity on your part.
I wasn't being pedantic, I was just noticing the very blatant. If you can't notice these continuity errors then you really are not very observant, they are VERY obvious.
In Friends she got married and pregnant without anyone knowing until they saw it, it seems to be the sort of 'surprise' that the Friends/Joey scriptwriters might add in.
Page: