The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Kurt Angle was seen clutching his hand several times at the Royal Rumble. Rumour has it that Kurt is ios experiencing loss of feeling in his right hand. It doesn't take a surgeon t realise that this is bad news for the again deterioriating state of Kurt's neck. Depending on how sensibly the WWE and Kurt himself plays things over the coming months, I'd reckon he has a year of active competition at most left in him.
> He is 57, him and my dad used to go and watch English wrestling all
> the time, and they always liked WWE so i asked him and he knew about
> the Flair/Angle thing. He was one of the main reasons i started
> watching it. He knows his stuff. Anything i have asked him he knows
> the answer to.
I see...Flair spent more time in WCW but I cannot doubt your 57 year old friend.
> Wardy_MoD wrote:
> [I]Lipe wrote:
> Wardy_MoD wrote:
> [I]Lipe wrote:
> Maybe because Kurt Angle's injury was worse? God...
>
> I heard Flairs was one of the worst you could get and Angle got the
> same problem
>
> Yeah sure you do. You only found out about Flair's injury in the
> other thread about 3 days ago.[/I]
>
> Yeah but then when i heard about it i spoke to my mate who has been
> a
> massive wrestling fan all his life and he said thay had pretty much
> the same injury, bloody hell! You're just trying to argue with me
> now, i dont question what you say
>
> If you feel the need to question what I say then go ahead. And how
> old is your mate?[/I]
He is 57, him and my dad used to go and watch English wrestling all the time, and they always liked WWE so i asked him and he knew about the Flair/Angle thing. He was one of the main reasons i started watching it. He knows his stuff. Anything i have asked him he knows the answer to.
> Lipe wrote:
> Wardy_MoD wrote:
> [I]Lipe wrote:
> Maybe because Kurt Angle's injury was worse? God...
>
> I heard Flairs was one of the worst you could get and Angle got the
> same problem
>
> Yeah sure you do. You only found out about Flair's injury in the
> other thread about 3 days ago.[/I]
>
> Yeah but then when i heard about it i spoke to my mate who has been a
> massive wrestling fan all his life and he said thay had pretty much
> the same injury, bloody hell! You're just trying to argue with me
> now, i dont question what you say
If you feel the need to question what I say then go ahead. And how old is your mate?
> Wardy_MoD wrote:
> [I]Lipe wrote:
> Maybe because Kurt Angle's injury was worse? God...
>
> I heard Flairs was one of the worst you could get and Angle got the
> same problem
>
> Yeah sure you do. You only found out about Flair's injury in the
> other thread about 3 days ago.[/I]
Yeah but then when i heard about it i spoke to my mate who has been a massive wrestling fan all his life and he said thay had pretty much the same injury, bloody hell! You're just trying to argue with me now, i dont question what you say
> Lipe wrote:
> Maybe because Kurt Angle's injury was worse? God...
>
> I heard Flairs was one of the worst you could get and Angle got the
> same problem
Yeah sure you do. You only found out about Flair's injury in the other thread about 3 days ago.
But at least they have cut out Hardcore Matches which are carreer shortening, but saying that they have Elimination Chamber, Steel Cages etc which make up for the loss of Hardcore Matches in the way of carreer shortening.
> Lipe wrote:
> Maybe because Kurt Angle's injury was worse? God...
>
> I heard Flairs was one of the worst you could get and Angle got the
> same problem
couldn't say for sure, but again, Angle wrestled in a different climate to Flair. 1 years worth of professional wrestling on todays level probably does the same amount of damage as the first 5-6 years of flairs career.
> Brock actually deserves some praise for that.
the only thing he DOESN'T deserve praise for is his backstage attitude at times and the way he handled his leaving (and the fact that he should've mentioned this when it was contract time), he was very good and a very accompished athlete. Granted, the ferocity of his push was undeserved but that's not his fault. WWE saw a product and went about marketing it, simple as that.
> Maybe because Kurt Angle's injury was worse? God...
I heard Flairs was one of the worst you could get and Angle got the same problem