The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If you could travel back in timt to when Hitler was a child...you only have five seconds to change the course of history...could you kill him?
could you shoot a four year old boy to save the life of 40 million?
could you shoot a four year old boy to save the life of 40 million?
Page:
The original question was crap, lets party.
good call cooks...but defeats the object of the original question!!!!!!
Sod going back to kill hitler, i'd put a lottery ticket on for the £15m jackpot draw from last weekend.
FinalFantastyFanatic....was amazed by Forkboy68 using the word contentious....doesnt take much to amaze him does it!!!!!!
Ineedsleep wrote:
> mermoid wrote:
>
> Without Hitler we wouldn't have VW Beetles either.
>
> Now THAT is a reason to shoot him.
you sir, have no taste :P
i don't think i'd shoot hitler, but i'd warn his parents that his uncle was going to molest him and turn him into a fruitcake (note: i'm open to rebuttle on this, i'm pretty sure it's true but not 100%)
> mermoid wrote:
>
> Without Hitler we wouldn't have VW Beetles either.
>
> Now THAT is a reason to shoot him.
you sir, have no taste :P
i don't think i'd shoot hitler, but i'd warn his parents that his uncle was going to molest him and turn him into a fruitcake (note: i'm open to rebuttle on this, i'm pretty sure it's true but not 100%)
I think the main question here is how forkboy knew the word contentious.
mermoid wrote:
> Without Hitler we wouldn't have VW Beetles either.
Now THAT is a reason to shoot him.
> Without Hitler we wouldn't have VW Beetles either.
Now THAT is a reason to shoot him.
Thing is, I went back and killed Groberg.
Do do do do dododod dododododddooooo
Do do do do dododod dododododddooooo
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Why wouldn't he do it? I'd do it, I'd do it a thousand times if it
> meant all those millions of people didn't die.
If it meant that.
But it probably wouldn't.
Let's just all agree with AJP Taylor and accept that war would eventually be the natural outcome of Germany's history from 1870 onwards.
> Why wouldn't he do it? I'd do it, I'd do it a thousand times if it
> meant all those millions of people didn't die.
If it meant that.
But it probably wouldn't.
Let's just all agree with AJP Taylor and accept that war would eventually be the natural outcome of Germany's history from 1870 onwards.
Domaye wrote:
> crossbob wrote:
> Yes I would I would grab him by the neck throw him at a wall and
> shoot
> him in the head and watch his brain splat on the wall!
> just a single reply to that. no you wouldn't like someone down there
> sed you have no idea the kind of emotions you would have if this
> happened to you. If you did do it you would kill yourself of guilt. I
> doubt you even have a 1% knowhow of what happened with the nazis...
Shush now.
Why wouldn't he do it? I'd do it, I'd do it a thousand times if it meant all those millions of people didn't die. I'd place my own consious slightly below the lives of several million people. Just slightly, mind.
ragh
Of course, I'd probably happen anyway. Hitler hardly brainwashed everyone into such action singlehandedly.
> crossbob wrote:
> Yes I would I would grab him by the neck throw him at a wall and
> shoot
> him in the head and watch his brain splat on the wall!
> just a single reply to that. no you wouldn't like someone down there
> sed you have no idea the kind of emotions you would have if this
> happened to you. If you did do it you would kill yourself of guilt. I
> doubt you even have a 1% knowhow of what happened with the nazis...
Shush now.
Why wouldn't he do it? I'd do it, I'd do it a thousand times if it meant all those millions of people didn't die. I'd place my own consious slightly below the lives of several million people. Just slightly, mind.
ragh
Of course, I'd probably happen anyway. Hitler hardly brainwashed everyone into such action singlehandedly.
Page: