The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I really hate lord of the rings! it has brought us 2 things, orlando bloom (good God NOOOOO!!!!!!!!) and as if that wasn't bad enough a race of nerds who would rather die defending its name than realise that any average book made into such an expensive film with rubbish actors (except that guy who plays that guy who was grey but turned white - due to too much gay sex or something) was all terrible!!!
Who can like such a film!!!
Who can think it is a great movie!!
Who can say that "they were brilliant to come up with something like that"
Nothing about the Lord of the Rings movies is good.
They have brought pain into my life, and because friends wanted to see them i saw all 3 films..... thats over 9 hours of my life wasted. I will so regret that on my death bed. But what's worse is people want to see the extented versions. They watch them again and agian and agian and again!!!!
What is good about this :
Film 1
"short hairy poppets have party. King Evilalot goes to war with all life. The best actor dies. The gremlins attack again. Lolypop and suckem'n'see trunddle over the hill of light to mount bad-egg, via swamp stinky poo, river flowseastdontyaknow, over the sea of cumador.
Film 2
"all hope is lost until Dum and Dee and an army of talking trees attack an army production facility like in C&C. The great knight sir ballsgalore lead all man kind over the mountain of fire through the river of eels to the castle of vipirearama, where he, by himself, killed all 32 trillion scro warriors who were sent to kill them for no reason, thus saving humanity, for another little while. He marched to mount freedom and talked to preist godly about his son dild oorg asims."
Film 3
"All life has backs to the walls tryin not to be bugg**ed. But the bad man forgot about that army of ghosts that can not be killed and save all life, until Lolypop and Suckem'n'see finally through an onion ring in some blow hole. Everybody except the best actor go to a dock and have an orgie of 'happy-love' then suckem'n'see dates a real girl entering into a life of sexual oppression"
I really hate it.
Anybody who says otherwise take it elsewhere this is for people who hate them and want to celebrate it!! You get to celebrate liking them, so i will enjoy hating them!!!
Who can like such a film!!!
Who can think it is a great movie!!
Who can say that "they were brilliant to come up with something like that"
Nothing about the Lord of the Rings movies is good.
They have brought pain into my life, and because friends wanted to see them i saw all 3 films..... thats over 9 hours of my life wasted. I will so regret that on my death bed. But what's worse is people want to see the extented versions. They watch them again and agian and agian and again!!!!
What is good about this :
Film 1
"short hairy poppets have party. King Evilalot goes to war with all life. The best actor dies. The gremlins attack again. Lolypop and suckem'n'see trunddle over the hill of light to mount bad-egg, via swamp stinky poo, river flowseastdontyaknow, over the sea of cumador.
Film 2
"all hope is lost until Dum and Dee and an army of talking trees attack an army production facility like in C&C. The great knight sir ballsgalore lead all man kind over the mountain of fire through the river of eels to the castle of vipirearama, where he, by himself, killed all 32 trillion scro warriors who were sent to kill them for no reason, thus saving humanity, for another little while. He marched to mount freedom and talked to preist godly about his son dild oorg asims."
Film 3
"All life has backs to the walls tryin not to be bugg**ed. But the bad man forgot about that army of ghosts that can not be killed and save all life, until Lolypop and Suckem'n'see finally through an onion ring in some blow hole. Everybody except the best actor go to a dock and have an orgie of 'happy-love' then suckem'n'see dates a real girl entering into a life of sexual oppression"
I really hate it.
Anybody who says otherwise take it elsewhere this is for people who hate them and want to celebrate it!! You get to celebrate liking them, so i will enjoy hating them!!!
Page:
You really are a spazz.
Zhuge Liang wrote:
> Emitime wrote:
> I doubt you've read the books. They were brilliant. But yeah, the
> movies are pap.
>
> If the books were so good then why didn't it win all those awards
> they won after the god-forsaken films were punched out of hollywood.
Because it was written over 50 years ago?
> Emitime wrote:
> I doubt you've read the books. They were brilliant. But yeah, the
> movies are pap.
>
> If the books were so good then why didn't it win all those awards
> they won after the god-forsaken films were punched out of hollywood.
Because it was written over 50 years ago?
they could have made the films into one 3 hour long movie. They were very poor films by any standards except use of special effects. Make on about the 300 spartans, xenophobon's 10000 or the battle of sekigahara any day over these excuses for films.
(almost as bad as the matrix 3!)
(almost as bad as the matrix 3!)
Emitime wrote:
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> Emitime wrote:
> I doubt you've read the books. They were brilliant. But yeah, the
> movies are pap.
>
> If the books were so good then why didn't it win all those awards
> they won after the god-forsaken films were punched out of hollywood.
>
> Because it was written over 50 years ago?
Don't you think some classics are older than that?
Do you think they didn't have awards back then?
> Zhuge Liang wrote:
> Emitime wrote:
> I doubt you've read the books. They were brilliant. But yeah, the
> movies are pap.
>
> If the books were so good then why didn't it win all those awards
> they won after the god-forsaken films were punched out of hollywood.
>
> Because it was written over 50 years ago?
Don't you think some classics are older than that?
Do you think they didn't have awards back then?
it was just like when everybody loved titanic. It was rubbish too (though i liked the breast scene).
Except Titanic was rubbish, LotR is brilliant. You utter, utter moron.
Rickoss wrote:
> Except Titanic was rubbish, LotR is brilliant. You utter, utter moron.
you udder sucking crowd following goose.
Many small and hairy people like the film. that i can't understand!! But normal folk?! no ! not them too??!!!!
> Except Titanic was rubbish, LotR is brilliant. You utter, utter moron.
you udder sucking crowd following goose.
Many small and hairy people like the film. that i can't understand!! But normal folk?! no ! not them too??!!!!
Or maybe you're just a retard who doesn't know a good film when he sees one?
people who like the films should wake up!!
Vanilla sky now there is a great film.
Lord of the Rings is WW2 in fantasy form and exaggerated. Now what was wrong with WW2 itslef?
Vanilla sky now there is a great film.
Lord of the Rings is WW2 in fantasy form and exaggerated. Now what was wrong with WW2 itslef?
Rickoss wrote:
> Or maybe you're just a retard who doesn't know a good film when he
> sees one?
i hope you wasted your money on all the DVD's then the extra DVD's they brought out later. then the boxed set. then part 3 with extra 32 hours of unseen film!
> Or maybe you're just a retard who doesn't know a good film when he
> sees one?
i hope you wasted your money on all the DVD's then the extra DVD's they brought out later. then the boxed set. then part 3 with extra 32 hours of unseen film!
Page: