Viewing Thread:
"Zip it you two"

Going to have a little mini-rant on two players opening their big fat gobs - Alan Smith and Terry Henry

Firstly Smudger - What in the hell are you on about calling Ronaldo selfish. Hmmm where have all these black pots and kettles come from? That's what makes Ronaldo dangerous, just running at players with the ball and not caring about where the team is until he gets around the by line area and after about the 7th stepover. I was watching the Villa game and it was like a different Ronaldo, he began to run at a player and then stopped to look for a pass only for that numpty (usually Smith or Fletcher) to lose it. You wouldn't stifle Giggsy's creativity don't bloody do it to the Portugese wizard. And even when he does set up a move you still can't bloody score from 3 yards out. Now zip it because you're far easier to replace in the squad then Ronaldo is.

secondly Mr Henry decides to flap his gums about Man United and Chelsea buying players while Henry is happy Arsenal play the youth. Ah yes Henry would that be great home grown talents like Jose Reyes? Matthew Flamini? Cesc Fabregas? Gael Clichy? Ah yes great home town boys there. Are United and Chelsea taking money from little orphans to buy their players? Nope i don't think so so what business of yours is it about who we buy and how much for. Or again it could be because your frightened? Chelsea far away in the distance, United nippin at your toes, is that a bit of fear in your eyes Henry? Oh sorry you're French it's always there :-D

zip it both of you numpties and concentrate on the football. Gary Neville can talk enough for everyone :-D

It's not exactly that he is a genius, it's more that his name is Genius Neville. Genius is what the G. stands for on the back of his shirt....

Really well knock me down with a feather and call me Ben what's his face.

Colourless wrote:
> It's not exactly that he is a genius, it's more that his name is
> Genius Neville. Genius is what the G. stands for on the back of his
> shirt....

LOL

lalakersrule wrote:
> Matthew Flamini? Cesc Fabregas? Gael Clichy?

And how old are these players?
That's right.

And how old are the players that Chelsea and Man Utd bought?
Yeah, glad we've cleared that up.

I should make it clear that I'm not disagreeing with you though. I'm simply pointing out that ManYoo/Chelsea bought already somewhat established/older players, whereas Arsenal bought younger talents that can be developed.

"And how old are the players that Chelsea and Man Utd bought?"

Chelsea is a different matter considering their supply of money, but united...

Smith - 24
Bellion - 20
Rooney - 19
Ronaldo - 19
Pique - 17
Rossi - 17

Yes, a few of them cost a bit, but so did reyes.

or†ega wrote:

> Smith - 24
> Bellion - 20
> Rooney - 19
> Ronaldo - 19
> Pique - 17
> Rossi - 17
>
> Yes, a few of them cost a bit, but so did reyes.

One player who cost us 10mil going on to 20 if he performs against a guaranteed 50mil???

If ya got the cash...Probably wouldnt have bought rooney had newcastle not come in, but united wernt gonna let him go considering players like ronaldinho, Rivaldo and Shearer had been missed out on in the past.

At the end of day Wenger has had to buy these cheapo youngsters becasue the money just isnt there.

Well, you all know who the best youngster is in British football.

Florent
Sinima
Pongolle

A flo-flo.

Right, ive either misread the original post completley wrong or i'm stating the obvious here. He said he's happy playing the youth, yes? That bares no relation in my mind to home grown talent. Youth of all nationalities, dont see the problem. Youth doesnt automatically mean home grown talent.

Or am i being dense?

Stryke should have written:
> Florent
> Sinama
> Pongolle

;-)