The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
pie :: Reviewed 21/11/2004
"This is a quality game i have had hours of fun from and will do for a long time to come. if you ask me if you have a few poud spare buy this brill game"
**************************
He's going to be "doing" his for a long time to come. I dunno, dude. That's a pretty small hole...
Look at me. I'm a spamming machine today!
"This is a quality game i have had hours of fun from and will do for a long time to come. if you ask me if you have a few poud spare buy this brill game"
**************************
He's going to be "doing" his for a long time to come. I dunno, dude. That's a pretty small hole...
Look at me. I'm a spamming machine today!
Page:
The N64 controller is the best games controller ever.
Explain how Goldeneye is overrated and the N64 controller dreadful.
Because I find both of those comments worrying. Really.
Because I find both of those comments worrying. Really.
Nothing will beat a good old joystick.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Explain how Goldeneye is overrated and the N64 controller dreadful.
>
> Because I find both of those comments worrying. Really.
Well, people say that Goldeneye is this good:
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When it's really only this good:
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The N-64 pad makes the X-box controller look small.
And it's a trident.
I ONLY HAVE TWO HANDS!
AM I A MUTANT OF SOME SORT? (Rhetorical question)
> Explain how Goldeneye is overrated and the N64 controller dreadful.
>
> Because I find both of those comments worrying. Really.
Well, people say that Goldeneye is this good:
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When it's really only this good:
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The N-64 pad makes the X-box controller look small.
And it's a trident.
I ONLY HAVE TWO HANDS!
AM I A MUTANT OF SOME SORT? (Rhetorical question)
The thing is, though, you don't use all 3 sections at once. Games either feature the D-pad or the joystick, or at the most alternating between them occasionally.
You don't need 3 hands to use the N64 controller, and have no reason complain as no games have serious features involving using all sections at once.
You don't need 3 hands to use the N64 controller, and have no reason complain as no games have serious features involving using all sections at once.
munn wrote:
> Oh, well sorry, but I don't watch every post made. I wondered why
> he'd spelt it wrong, as I figured he'd just have clicked the
> "reply quoting post" button.
>
> Anyway, what's more moronic?
> Me not knowing that, or being you?
Well niether really. You not knowing that is just you not beind sad. And being me just happens to be what I am. There is no description of it, it just is that way.
> Oh, well sorry, but I don't watch every post made. I wondered why
> he'd spelt it wrong, as I figured he'd just have clicked the
> "reply quoting post" button.
>
> Anyway, what's more moronic?
> Me not knowing that, or being you?
Well niether really. You not knowing that is just you not beind sad. And being me just happens to be what I am. There is no description of it, it just is that way.
AfroJoe wrote:
> The thing is, though, you don't use all 3 sections at once. Games
> either feature the D-pad or the joystick, or at the most alternating
> between them occasionally.
>
> You don't need 3 hands to use the N64 controller, and have no reason
> complain as no games have serious features involving using all
> sections at once.
But, it's therefore inefficient if you only need to use two parts of it, as a third area is being put to waste.
> The thing is, though, you don't use all 3 sections at once. Games
> either feature the D-pad or the joystick, or at the most alternating
> between them occasionally.
>
> You don't need 3 hands to use the N64 controller, and have no reason
> complain as no games have serious features involving using all
> sections at once.
But, it's therefore inefficient if you only need to use two parts of it, as a third area is being put to waste.
Which makes it a crap controller yes?
No. If anything it makes it better.
No. If anything it makes it better.
eye'Aoe wrote:
> Well niether really. You not knowing that is just you not beind sad.
> And being me just happens to be what I am. There is no description of
> it, it just is that way.
Meh, I was just in a mood because you called me moronic.
BUt I'm not. So I retort. With stupid insults.
> Well niether really. You not knowing that is just you not beind sad.
> And being me just happens to be what I am. There is no description of
> it, it just is that way.
Meh, I was just in a mood because you called me moronic.
BUt I'm not. So I retort. With stupid insults.
munn wrote:
> eye'Aoe wrote:
> Well niether really. You not knowing that is just you not beind sad.
> And being me just happens to be what I am. There is no description
> of
> it, it just is that way.
>
> Meh, I was just in a mood because you called me moronic.
> BUt I'm not. So I retort. With stupid insults.
Meh?
This seems like you're letting me win this small argument... I usually lose/give up... This isn't supposed to happen.
:(
> eye'Aoe wrote:
> Well niether really. You not knowing that is just you not beind sad.
> And being me just happens to be what I am. There is no description
> of
> it, it just is that way.
>
> Meh, I was just in a mood because you called me moronic.
> BUt I'm not. So I retort. With stupid insults.
Meh?
This seems like you're letting me win this small argument... I usually lose/give up... This isn't supposed to happen.
:(
Page: