Viewing Thread:
"purity and chastity"

One thing that really astonishes me is the number of people who sleep around in the world today. For those of us among us who believe in the Bibile, sex outside marriage is forbidden, yet so many people, religeous and otherwise, see it their duty to have multiple sexual partners. Its only a symbol of social standing in some places in AFRICA. How can we call ourselves the civilised world when we see fit to stick our john thomas in every place we can think of. Its level with the animals, and even some of them have the decency to confine themselves to one partner. (i.e. swans)

Im not trying to push chastity and say all sexual acticity is WRONG outside marriage, but I really think that sex and similar acts are something that you should share with only someone special. The only purpose of one night stands is to get some POONTANG with whatever skank can be found on the street. (I dont mean to degrade women, I just have to write this from the male perspective, the same applies to women)

Chastity generally means that you dont do ANYTHING sexual at all outside of marraige. Personally I dont see whats wrong with a little frolic in the garden of eden if its legal, legal by the bible, and doesnt put your future in jeprody through inadvertant pregnancy. What happens if the chick you boned on a one night stand get knocked up? Its your obligation to raise the b*****d child, and wed the whench. lol. I just enjoy using biassed language. I'll stop now.

Since (as I have been informed by a good friend of mine whos a history guru) the general practise of prolific intercourse has been going on for millenia, were not really doing anything different, however if we didnt do anything different we'd still be eating leaves, not even using tools. Evolution and invention meant progress, technological and personal. Sleeping around like this means that sex isnt sacred. It becomes meaningless when you finally meet someone you marry, and all you can do is compare them to your previous partners.

I know Im on a losing side. Most of you are probably against me, but Id just like you to consider the idea of, not chastity, but, however hard it may be, not sleeping around. If you meet someone special to you, by all means, even if its not the first. At least then its actually meaningful. But having shallow, meaningless sex is....well...m**********g. YOU'LL GO BLIND SON!!

Ashman wrote:
> That was a bit far Azul, really.
>
> I don't have a problem with your jokes most of the time but even I
> thought that was inappropriate.

Oh, my heart felt apologies.
I beg for forgiveness.

Wel flock (I like your tagline btw) thats what makes you and me different. I dont differentiate between sex and love that much. Sure, animals have sex without love but they dont love at all. Thats what makes humans different. This poses all sorts of religeous and metaphysical (BIG WORD!) questions about the world, that most people have made up thier mind about. But why do we, as humans, love, and animals don't? Surely it suggests some higher presence? Anyway I wont try and convert you to my Cult, the Fozzites (www.fozzisgood.com). But if you think that sex is just mating, then why do so many couples JUST do it with their married partner? If its just mating surely people would be ok for mass orgies and multiple partners. "So how was sex today dear?" The truth is that sex is something that couples hold sacred and has close ties to love. Without love sex is empty. Im not confusing the two, we just have different opinions about it. I think the only religeon that really was oppressive about sex was the puritan religeon, and that was really ridiculous. (see 'the scarlet letter') Of course sex is completely natural, however it isnt just FUN, it comes with a huge amount of responsibility, you can have sex without being willing to be responsible for your actions.

I really dont think chastity is necessary or even logical once married. Some couples actually agree not to have sex or anything like it for as long as they live. I just think that it should be something extremely personal and loving between you and your partner, not something FUN to be experienced with random partners. I commend you for not sleeping round, and admit that trying it once was probably a good idea. If you hadnt you might have spent your life regretting and wondering. But if you say youre too romantic to have sex with anyone but your partner then how can you say Im confusing love and sex?

That was a bit far Azul, really.

I don't have a problem with your jokes most of the time but even I thought that was inappropriate.

Oh come on - you know as well as I do that that hair do means something.

Azul wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> The fact of the matter is sex is fun
>
> Even if, like Flock, it's with little kids.
>
> Ahahaha.

Oh, youre soooooooo funny.

Flock wrote:
> The fact of the matter is sex is fun

Even if, like Flock, it's with little kids.

Ahahaha.

There's a big difference between sex and love, dont be confusing the two.
The fact of the matter is sex is fun, it's a biolgical urge and it's completely natural, religion has suppressed that urge to an exstent but with the death of religion in the western world that suppression is gone and the kids are certainly enjoying their freedom.
You are right about holding out for love to an exstent but not many people will share you view while unmarried, what is sad are the people who still dont agree to chastity once married.
I'm not one for sleeping around, i never have been, i've always been too romantic in the way i see things to ever let go and just find some girl for a night although i did try it to find out and found i was right that it wasn't for me, however i wont be stopped from sleeping with someone i'm in love with just because i'm not married to them, there is a line and thats where i choose to draw mine.
Everyone draws their own lines, yours may be a little strict for the majority but people have to live their own lives and take the consequences.

lol trish. Im not trying to get everyone to join me in the monastery, I know that pretty much nobody wants to. Im just saying my point of view and letting you know that not everyone tries to spread their seed like sowing corn.

ha you can't genuinely believe this. Yes you can believe the shouldn't have loads of partners at once, or just shag some random for a number, but the rest like no sex out of marriage is far too dated.

I do believe in fidelity, if you are with a girlfriend i believe cheating is far to harsh and personally i try to avoid it!

just go with what you are comfortable, bu if you are trying to convince every one to join you in the monastry you are fighting a losing battle.

Fozz wrote:
>
> in that case surely a lot of other things we do should be downgraded
> to suit our animal nature. such as eating habbits, social habbits.

I would argue this already exists.


> and religeon should be
> abolished. eh? Where can you draw the line?

That would be quite nice.