The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
One thing that really astonishes me is the number of people who sleep around in the world today. For those of us among us who believe in the Bibile, sex outside marriage is forbidden, yet so many people, religeous and otherwise, see it their duty to have multiple sexual partners. Its only a symbol of social standing in some places in AFRICA. How can we call ourselves the civilised world when we see fit to stick our john thomas in every place we can think of. Its level with the animals, and even some of them have the decency to confine themselves to one partner. (i.e. swans)
Im not trying to push chastity and say all sexual acticity is WRONG outside marriage, but I really think that sex and similar acts are something that you should share with only someone special. The only purpose of one night stands is to get some POONTANG with whatever skank can be found on the street. (I dont mean to degrade women, I just have to write this from the male perspective, the same applies to women)
Chastity generally means that you dont do ANYTHING sexual at all outside of marraige. Personally I dont see whats wrong with a little frolic in the garden of eden if its legal, legal by the bible, and doesnt put your future in jeprody through inadvertant pregnancy. What happens if the chick you boned on a one night stand get knocked up? Its your obligation to raise the b*****d child, and wed the whench. lol. I just enjoy using biassed language. I'll stop now.
Since (as I have been informed by a good friend of mine whos a history guru) the general practise of prolific intercourse has been going on for millenia, were not really doing anything different, however if we didnt do anything different we'd still be eating leaves, not even using tools. Evolution and invention meant progress, technological and personal. Sleeping around like this means that sex isnt sacred. It becomes meaningless when you finally meet someone you marry, and all you can do is compare them to your previous partners.
I know Im on a losing side. Most of you are probably against me, but Id just like you to consider the idea of, not chastity, but, however hard it may be, not sleeping around. If you meet someone special to you, by all means, even if its not the first. At least then its actually meaningful. But having shallow, meaningless sex is....well...m**********g. YOU'LL GO BLIND SON!!
Im not trying to push chastity and say all sexual acticity is WRONG outside marriage, but I really think that sex and similar acts are something that you should share with only someone special. The only purpose of one night stands is to get some POONTANG with whatever skank can be found on the street. (I dont mean to degrade women, I just have to write this from the male perspective, the same applies to women)
Chastity generally means that you dont do ANYTHING sexual at all outside of marraige. Personally I dont see whats wrong with a little frolic in the garden of eden if its legal, legal by the bible, and doesnt put your future in jeprody through inadvertant pregnancy. What happens if the chick you boned on a one night stand get knocked up? Its your obligation to raise the b*****d child, and wed the whench. lol. I just enjoy using biassed language. I'll stop now.
Since (as I have been informed by a good friend of mine whos a history guru) the general practise of prolific intercourse has been going on for millenia, were not really doing anything different, however if we didnt do anything different we'd still be eating leaves, not even using tools. Evolution and invention meant progress, technological and personal. Sleeping around like this means that sex isnt sacred. It becomes meaningless when you finally meet someone you marry, and all you can do is compare them to your previous partners.
I know Im on a losing side. Most of you are probably against me, but Id just like you to consider the idea of, not chastity, but, however hard it may be, not sleeping around. If you meet someone special to you, by all means, even if its not the first. At least then its actually meaningful. But having shallow, meaningless sex is....well...m**********g. YOU'LL GO BLIND SON!!
Page:
Flock wrote:
> Yep unfortunatly but if you reduce everything to that level you'll be
> missing out on the extra dimension it gives, just really repeating
> what i've already said, i KNOW it's biology but i WANT it to be more.
I said 'You could say', because despite what else I said, I do believe there is more, I just didn't want to bring up the whole spiritual side as it too often gets linked to religion, which really is a separate issue in my opinion.
> Yep unfortunatly but if you reduce everything to that level you'll be
> missing out on the extra dimension it gives, just really repeating
> what i've already said, i KNOW it's biology but i WANT it to be more.
I said 'You could say', because despite what else I said, I do believe there is more, I just didn't want to bring up the whole spiritual side as it too often gets linked to religion, which really is a separate issue in my opinion.
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> How do you know it is only found in humans?
Our nearest relative species are apes, and all of them use the alpha male system, where one alpha male gets all the mates. Its difficult to say for other species like dolphins, or swans who have only one partner, but its clear from apes that love isnt present
> How do you know it is only found in humans?
Our nearest relative species are apes, and all of them use the alpha male system, where one alpha male gets all the mates. Its difficult to say for other species like dolphins, or swans who have only one partner, but its clear from apes that love isnt present
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> Love, you could say, is just a cocktail of chemicals produced in, and
> manipulating the brain.
Yep unfortunatly but if you reduce everything to that level you'll be missing out on the extra dimension it gives, just really repeating what i've already said, i KNOW it's biology but i WANT it to be more.
> Love, you could say, is just a cocktail of chemicals produced in, and
> manipulating the brain.
Yep unfortunatly but if you reduce everything to that level you'll be missing out on the extra dimension it gives, just really repeating what i've already said, i KNOW it's biology but i WANT it to be more.
Fozz wrote:
> You make a very difficult argument about ego boosts etc. My hats off
> to you. If you want sex now surely you could just visit Mrs Palm and
> her five lovely daughters.
Because sex isn't just about the act, it's about ego, anyone go can please themselves but finding someone is more difficult and more rewarding in terms of ego, confidence and pleasure.
> You said that. Now if Im not mistaken we're talking aobut sex not
> love? ahem. lol oh well. I know what you mean though. Of course I
> wouldnt deny it to them. I just think there are other ways for a
> confidence boost, like..even just flirting, cybersex maybe, light
> petting, or bad german fetish porn. There is more to sex than just
> what other people think of you.
All of what you suggested would not compare favourably with going out and finding someone for the night, if i haven't made it clear what i mean ask yourself why people would rather go out and pick someone up than visit Mrs Palm as you so eloquently call her ?
> You make a very difficult argument about ego boosts etc. My hats off
> to you. If you want sex now surely you could just visit Mrs Palm and
> her five lovely daughters.
Because sex isn't just about the act, it's about ego, anyone go can please themselves but finding someone is more difficult and more rewarding in terms of ego, confidence and pleasure.
> You said that. Now if Im not mistaken we're talking aobut sex not
> love? ahem. lol oh well. I know what you mean though. Of course I
> wouldnt deny it to them. I just think there are other ways for a
> confidence boost, like..even just flirting, cybersex maybe, light
> petting, or bad german fetish porn. There is more to sex than just
> what other people think of you.
All of what you suggested would not compare favourably with going out and finding someone for the night, if i haven't made it clear what i mean ask yourself why people would rather go out and pick someone up than visit Mrs Palm as you so eloquently call her ?
How do you know it is only found in humans?
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> Love, you could say, is just a cocktail of chemicals produced in, and
> manipulating the brain.
then why is it only found in humans?
> Love, you could say, is just a cocktail of chemicals produced in, and
> manipulating the brain.
then why is it only found in humans?
Love, you could say, is just a cocktail of chemicals produced in, and manipulating the brain.
Wait a second flock. How is love biology?
munn wrote:
> Fozz wrote:
> You wont get rewarded in this life or the next (should
> you believe in it) according to the number of sexual partners youve
> had.
>
> You might - if you're a woman, then you could get pregnant to twenty
> different men, and claim childcare money fae them
lol. If you balance it out the costs of feeding and rearing twenty children (unless you could dump them with the guys, in which case you loose the benefit) far outweighs the money you'd get. Good idea though. hmm.. I might try that. even though Im a guy. HELP ME GOVERNOR ARNOLD
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> I think people read far too much into love and marriage and all that
> crap. All it is, is two people stuffing body parts into each other
> for personal enjoyment. Marriage is just a bit of paper that allows
> you to get better interest rates, cheaper holidays and joint
> cheque-books.
>
> If you completely dis-regard religion, as I do, being that I believe
> it all to be fraudulent or manipulated accounts of ancient primitives
> - then that is all it is, an intimate act between two consenting
> adults, and a legal contract.
I really feel sorry for you. Life is a clear cut walk down the production line towards an ever nearing meatgrinder for you isnt it?
> Fozz wrote:
> You wont get rewarded in this life or the next (should
> you believe in it) according to the number of sexual partners youve
> had.
>
> You might - if you're a woman, then you could get pregnant to twenty
> different men, and claim childcare money fae them
lol. If you balance it out the costs of feeding and rearing twenty children (unless you could dump them with the guys, in which case you loose the benefit) far outweighs the money you'd get. Good idea though. hmm.. I might try that. even though Im a guy. HELP ME GOVERNOR ARNOLD
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> I think people read far too much into love and marriage and all that
> crap. All it is, is two people stuffing body parts into each other
> for personal enjoyment. Marriage is just a bit of paper that allows
> you to get better interest rates, cheaper holidays and joint
> cheque-books.
>
> If you completely dis-regard religion, as I do, being that I believe
> it all to be fraudulent or manipulated accounts of ancient primitives
> - then that is all it is, an intimate act between two consenting
> adults, and a legal contract.
I really feel sorry for you. Life is a clear cut walk down the production line towards an ever nearing meatgrinder for you isnt it?
In reply to Borat, the point if marriage is not the arguement here but while it's brought up i'd say it's only meaningful if you choose to attach meaning to it, as for love you are correct again, it is only biology in the same way marriage is only a bit of paper, the meaning is only there if you want it, personally i do so i choose to believe it, i know otherwise but i am choosing what i want to beleive in and i've got the feeling it's the same for religion, you believe if you want to, if you reduce everything to exactly what it is thats all you're left with, by believing in love it adds an extra dimension to just plain old biology.
Page: