The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Pro-Hunt campaigners. For a start, it's a barbaric sport, causing unneccessary suffering to cut ickle foxes. And now it turns out the people that support can only express their opinions through violence. The reporter trying to interview people with blood running down their faces has to compete with mongoloids running up to the camera shouting "It suuuuucks!!!" in their finest mongol tones. Complete dickwads, in my opinion - just waiting for the Police to set the alsations on them, see how they like it.
Page:
As gerrid said. Introducing toxins would have untold risk.
You can't just mess with the food chain like that. It would cause untold problems and have huge effects on the ecosystem.
Similarly, trying to give drugs to animals to control their population is a vicious circle, as it can also have untold effects on the food chain, but it just leads to resistance and huge amounts of spending.
Fox hunting may be barbaric and not particularly effective at controlling fox populations, but at least it doesn't disrupt the environment.
Similarly, trying to give drugs to animals to control their population is a vicious circle, as it can also have untold effects on the food chain, but it just leads to resistance and huge amounts of spending.
Fox hunting may be barbaric and not particularly effective at controlling fox populations, but at least it doesn't disrupt the environment.
Blank wrote:
> Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Can even control vegetation, foxes diet, etc,
>
> Isn't that basically still killing them?
>
> Well, no. Not at all. You wouldn't say I killed someone if I had a
> vasectomy. If he's only talking about a percentage of foxes
> sterilised, to keep the population under control, then go for it.
>
>
> Notice the way I edited the post so that it didn't include the part
> on sterilisation, and only the parts on diet - the only bits I was
> addressing.
So by controlling vegetation and foxes' diets, you're still killing them? Of course not. I'm not trying to come off as some fox expert here, don't even care for them really, but I'm pretty sure there would be ways to control their population by introducing toxins into their diets to sterilise them. I dunno, you'd think there would be.
> Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Can even control vegetation, foxes diet, etc,
>
> Isn't that basically still killing them?
>
> Well, no. Not at all. You wouldn't say I killed someone if I had a
> vasectomy. If he's only talking about a percentage of foxes
> sterilised, to keep the population under control, then go for it.
>
>
> Notice the way I edited the post so that it didn't include the part
> on sterilisation, and only the parts on diet - the only bits I was
> addressing.
So by controlling vegetation and foxes' diets, you're still killing them? Of course not. I'm not trying to come off as some fox expert here, don't even care for them really, but I'm pretty sure there would be ways to control their population by introducing toxins into their diets to sterilise them. I dunno, you'd think there would be.
Wouldn't a complete ban on guns be a better idea? Does anyone actually need them anyway? It isn't like we live in bear or wolf territory since they became extinct a few hundred years ago.
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Can even control vegetation, foxes diet, etc,
>
> Isn't that basically still killing them?
>
> Well, no. Not at all. You wouldn't say I killed someone if I had a
> vasectomy. If he's only talking about a percentage of foxes
> sterilised, to keep the population under control, then go for it.
Notice the way I edited the post so that it didn't include the part on sterilisation, and only the parts on diet - the only bits I was addressing.
> Blank wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Can even control vegetation, foxes diet, etc,
>
> Isn't that basically still killing them?
>
> Well, no. Not at all. You wouldn't say I killed someone if I had a
> vasectomy. If he's only talking about a percentage of foxes
> sterilised, to keep the population under control, then go for it.
Notice the way I edited the post so that it didn't include the part on sterilisation, and only the parts on diet - the only bits I was addressing.
If all our traditions are removed then we will be like america. Boring.
I personally am not a great fan of foxes as they crap all over the garden. I mean there is a few hundred acres of nice woodland about 200 metres away but nooooo have to crap on the lawn.
M4s are unlikely to ever be available here although the ban on automatic rifles in america has now expired, expect a shooting in a school near you soon. I know of quite a few people who will not try to avoid a fox in the road. I feel annoyed that even with thousands of people pretesting (90% peacefully) they will be ignored because this has become a political screen now and im sure people who have no idea what they are talking about would be ever so annoyed if fox hunting continued. Why are we worrying about foxes, lets worry about other animals that are actually endangered, lets stop all these homes being built in the southeast on green land. Lets focus more on people rather than bloody foxes. Damned things crapping on my lawn.
I personally am not a great fan of foxes as they crap all over the garden. I mean there is a few hundred acres of nice woodland about 200 metres away but nooooo have to crap on the lawn.
M4s are unlikely to ever be available here although the ban on automatic rifles in america has now expired, expect a shooting in a school near you soon. I know of quite a few people who will not try to avoid a fox in the road. I feel annoyed that even with thousands of people pretesting (90% peacefully) they will be ignored because this has become a political screen now and im sure people who have no idea what they are talking about would be ever so annoyed if fox hunting continued. Why are we worrying about foxes, lets worry about other animals that are actually endangered, lets stop all these homes being built in the southeast on green land. Lets focus more on people rather than bloody foxes. Damned things crapping on my lawn.
Is anyone here against the barbaric policy of the government to poison the living daylights out of Britain's rat population? If Lord Moustachio and co. were going around hunting rats with dogs, would any of you care? Would yuo be rallying to 'save the rat'?
Why dont the foxes just claim asylum in scotland? They are clearly being persecuted in their own homes.
Thank goodness it's banned in Scotland. I definetly want to see it banned completely. Damn posh b...
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Can even control vegetation, foxes diet, etc,
>
> Isn't that basically still killing them?
>
> Well, no. Not at all. You wouldn't say I killed someone if I had a
> vasectomy. If he's only talking about a percentage of foxes
> sterilised, to keep the population under control, then go for it.
Actually many Christians believe it to be stopping protential life, so I suspose you could call it murder, in away?
> Blank wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> Can even control vegetation, foxes diet, etc,
>
> Isn't that basically still killing them?
>
> Well, no. Not at all. You wouldn't say I killed someone if I had a
> vasectomy. If he's only talking about a percentage of foxes
> sterilised, to keep the population under control, then go for it.
Actually many Christians believe it to be stopping protential life, so I suspose you could call it murder, in away?
Page: