The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Anyone else heard that hardcore porn could be on tv by october. Their relaxing the laws apparently. Yay!
Page:
you would probably get a pink blend emerging at 32!
I think 3 would be possible, 4 might be pushing it.
32 is my record...
False? If you think so dial 02345 786456
True? If you think so, dial 999
False? If you think so dial 02345 786456
True? If you think so, dial 999
Mumbai Duck wrote:
> There's only so many times in a day you can jack off, let
> alone want to.
True, if only the testes werent so damn lazy.
> There's only so many times in a day you can jack off, let
> alone want to.
True, if only the testes werent so damn lazy.
1. You have the internet: download all the movies you want.
2. Shut up.
2. Shut up.
i agree a terrestrial porn channel seems the only logical solution
Black Glove wrote:
> Hardcore porn via TV subscription is a disgrace. Seriously.
*Ponders BG's seriousness*
If it's alright to access hardcore porn at all, it seems odd to restrict it arbitrarily from one form of media.
I suppose people would be more 'compliant' if they were permanantly doped up on porn, but that doesn't necessarily mean they 'shouldn't be allowed' it.
Hell, people secure in their freedom from poverty must be easier to control, but that doesn't mean it's a bad thing!
Then again, if the government dished out heroine to citizens to keep them compliant and reliant on the state, it's a bad thing. Even if people do 'choose' to take the drugs.
And how do we really seperate an addiction from an overpowering natural instinct? Surely not by strength of the compulsion alone...
However, I don't see it getting to the extent of 24 hour sex-viewing.
There's only so many times in a day you can jack off, let alone want to.
I figure it'd settle to reasonable use, if a lot more abundant than normal. Once people got over the novelty of instant hardcore, they'd just use it comparatively moderately.
> Hardcore porn via TV subscription is a disgrace. Seriously.
*Ponders BG's seriousness*
If it's alright to access hardcore porn at all, it seems odd to restrict it arbitrarily from one form of media.
I suppose people would be more 'compliant' if they were permanantly doped up on porn, but that doesn't necessarily mean they 'shouldn't be allowed' it.
Hell, people secure in their freedom from poverty must be easier to control, but that doesn't mean it's a bad thing!
Then again, if the government dished out heroine to citizens to keep them compliant and reliant on the state, it's a bad thing. Even if people do 'choose' to take the drugs.
And how do we really seperate an addiction from an overpowering natural instinct? Surely not by strength of the compulsion alone...
However, I don't see it getting to the extent of 24 hour sex-viewing.
There's only so many times in a day you can jack off, let alone want to.
I figure it'd settle to reasonable use, if a lot more abundant than normal. Once people got over the novelty of instant hardcore, they'd just use it comparatively moderately.
gamesfreak wrote:
> We want cold hard evidence of this.
... you said "hard"...
> We want cold hard evidence of this.
... you said "hard"...
Black Glove wrote:
> Hardcore porn via TV subscription is a disgrace. Seriously.
But it's always a shame to waste a stonker
> Hardcore porn via TV subscription is a disgrace. Seriously.
But it's always a shame to waste a stonker
Self abuse is wrong.
Page: