The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Anyone else heard that hardcore porn could be on tv by october. Their relaxing the laws apparently. Yay!
Page:
Black Glove wrote:
> And monkey_man says "just turn over" - what, soap operas
> versus hardcore porn, Saturday night tv versus hardcore porn, dire
> sitcoms versus hardcore - there's only one winner: the ratings will
> sky high and before long there'll be hundreds and hundreds of
> channels, featuring every possible strain, from barely legal to
> grannies, from watersports to bukkake.
I'd agree, why watch crap tv when you can watch porn? You just wouldn't - not until you'd worn yourself out.
But think about it for a second - why is it such an obvious winner? Because so many people watch all that crap on tv out of habit or boredom, not because they really want to.
Still, some people would still watch 'non-porn', there'd still be normal programs available.
Plus the porn would be limted to certain hours or restricted access channels. There'll still be regular tv available.
> On the internet, there's no stopping it.
True, but there are still one or two non-porn web sites too, everyone has a choice :^)
> But seriously, does no-one agree with me?
> that [ultimately] porn is about humilation and degradation, and
> that's why 90% of men view it: to see young slutz [the likes of which
> they are never gonna f**k] get humilated and degraded.
Hmm. I'm not sure, I guess it could be for some, but I doubt 90%.
The 'main' principle of porn is that people like sex, and porn offers a second best when they can't get it.
Sex isn't about humiliation and degredation, I don't think porn has to be either.
Then again, sometimes it does seem to be an aspect to it...
*ponders*
> And monkey_man says "just turn over" - what, soap operas
> versus hardcore porn, Saturday night tv versus hardcore porn, dire
> sitcoms versus hardcore - there's only one winner: the ratings will
> sky high and before long there'll be hundreds and hundreds of
> channels, featuring every possible strain, from barely legal to
> grannies, from watersports to bukkake.
I'd agree, why watch crap tv when you can watch porn? You just wouldn't - not until you'd worn yourself out.
But think about it for a second - why is it such an obvious winner? Because so many people watch all that crap on tv out of habit or boredom, not because they really want to.
Still, some people would still watch 'non-porn', there'd still be normal programs available.
Plus the porn would be limted to certain hours or restricted access channels. There'll still be regular tv available.
> On the internet, there's no stopping it.
True, but there are still one or two non-porn web sites too, everyone has a choice :^)
> But seriously, does no-one agree with me?
> that [ultimately] porn is about humilation and degradation, and
> that's why 90% of men view it: to see young slutz [the likes of which
> they are never gonna f**k] get humilated and degraded.
Hmm. I'm not sure, I guess it could be for some, but I doubt 90%.
The 'main' principle of porn is that people like sex, and porn offers a second best when they can't get it.
Sex isn't about humiliation and degredation, I don't think porn has to be either.
Then again, sometimes it does seem to be an aspect to it...
*ponders*
Black Glove wrote:
>
> And monkey_man says "just turn over" - what, soap operas
> versus hardcore porn,
Heh, and soap downgrades it self further to compete, resulting in:
PAT BUTCHER IN A SAUNA.
*Vomits*
>
> And monkey_man says "just turn over" - what, soap operas
> versus hardcore porn,
Heh, and soap downgrades it self further to compete, resulting in:
PAT BUTCHER IN A SAUNA.
*Vomits*
@ng3l wrote:
> I think that any type of porn should stay as pay-per view. Ok so you
> excpect this sort of comment from a female. Its bad enough having to
> watch a film and sex scenes will just pop up where not needed. I
> think nudity just occurs too much. Ok so the sad individuals that
> like getting naked fair play to them but at times when its just
> pushed in your face when you are least excpecting it is not on.
>
> I think that it should only stick to certain channels! Its ok for
> alot of people but i think TV will just start getting way to sleazy.
You raise some fair points, but not everyone who likes the occasional boobie is sad, we are just lonely :0)
I think sticking hardcore porn to one channel is certainly a good idea (hopefully channel 5), but relegating all films with sex in is harsh. I mean, the more-than-adequate ratings are there for a reason, but I guess a more prudent warning before it actually starts would be good, much like how Channel 5 used to, but no longer do.
> I think that any type of porn should stay as pay-per view. Ok so you
> excpect this sort of comment from a female. Its bad enough having to
> watch a film and sex scenes will just pop up where not needed. I
> think nudity just occurs too much. Ok so the sad individuals that
> like getting naked fair play to them but at times when its just
> pushed in your face when you are least excpecting it is not on.
>
> I think that it should only stick to certain channels! Its ok for
> alot of people but i think TV will just start getting way to sleazy.
You raise some fair points, but not everyone who likes the occasional boobie is sad, we are just lonely :0)
I think sticking hardcore porn to one channel is certainly a good idea (hopefully channel 5), but relegating all films with sex in is harsh. I mean, the more-than-adequate ratings are there for a reason, but I guess a more prudent warning before it actually starts would be good, much like how Channel 5 used to, but no longer do.
Black Glove wrote:
> that's why 90% of men view it: to see young slutz [the likes of which
> they are never gonna f**k] get humilated and degraded.
No, i watch to see them get naked and take the beef.
> that's why 90% of men view it: to see young slutz [the likes of which
> they are never gonna f**k] get humilated and degraded.
No, i watch to see them get naked and take the beef.
I think that any type of porn should stay as pay-per view. Ok so you excpect this sort of comment from a female. Its bad enough having to watch a film and sex scenes will just pop up where not needed. I think nudity just occurs too much. Ok so the sad individuals that like getting naked fair play to them but at times when its just pushed in your face when you are least excpecting it is not on.
I think that it should only stick to certain channels! Its ok for alot of people but i think TV will just start getting way to sleazy.
I think that it should only stick to certain channels! Its ok for alot of people but i think TV will just start getting way to sleazy.
If they relegate the porn to Channel 5 at 1am or something, I really can't see a problem with it.
Mumbai Duck wrote:
> *Ponders BG's seriousness*
I'm not sure how serious I was - its just I don't want to see TV turn into a porn portal.
And monkey_man says "just turn over" - what, soap operas versus hardcore porn, Saturday night tv versus hardcore porn, dire sitcoms versus hardcore - there's only one winner: the ratings will sky high and before long there'll be hundreds and hundreds of channels, featuring every possible strain, from barely legal to grannies, from watersports to bukkake.
On the internet, there's no stopping it. Just keep the TV set free of it, there's too much already. And its all about money. "If it makes money then its good" - that's the motto of this topsyturvy world, and this is just another symbol of its decline.
Mary Whitehouse lives! - But seriously, does no-one agree with me? that [ultimately] porn is about humilation and degradation, and that's why 90% of men view it: to see young slutz [the likes of which they are never gonna f**k] get humilated and degraded.
> *Ponders BG's seriousness*
I'm not sure how serious I was - its just I don't want to see TV turn into a porn portal.
And monkey_man says "just turn over" - what, soap operas versus hardcore porn, Saturday night tv versus hardcore porn, dire sitcoms versus hardcore - there's only one winner: the ratings will sky high and before long there'll be hundreds and hundreds of channels, featuring every possible strain, from barely legal to grannies, from watersports to bukkake.
On the internet, there's no stopping it. Just keep the TV set free of it, there's too much already. And its all about money. "If it makes money then its good" - that's the motto of this topsyturvy world, and this is just another symbol of its decline.
Mary Whitehouse lives! - But seriously, does no-one agree with me? that [ultimately] porn is about humilation and degradation, and that's why 90% of men view it: to see young slutz [the likes of which they are never gonna f**k] get humilated and degraded.
To be honest though, if you don't want to see it, turn over! Kids have to learn from somewhere, and I'd rather it was the pro's, not some kid at primary school who claims he can get the sex education video anytime he wanted because his mum is a dinner lady (true story).
october 5th
[URL]http://img5.imgspot.com/u/04/228/12/watchdogopensdoor.jpg[/URL]
[URL]http://img5.imgspot.com/u/04/228/12/watchdogopensdoor.jpg[/URL]
cookie monster wrote:
> I think 3 would be possible, 4 might be pushing it.
Pff, amateur.
> I think 3 would be possible, 4 might be pushing it.
Pff, amateur.
Page: