Viewing Thread:
"Should Notables be Sacked?"

This is the question. How long should a notable stay a notable if they no longer post on the forums?

1 Year
2 Years
3 Years
or Forever

1 year! Burn them at the stake!

Strafio wrote:

> Where's Sonic Rav nowdays?

Somewhere in South East Asia. He was going to travel from Russia through China to Japan. Don't know if he stuck with that or not, but that was the plan.

And he was going with his dentist. True.

Hum...my little brother appears to have signed in. That's odd.

Awww... makes me feel all nostalgic. Back in my day...

I think there is soon going to be too many notables, soon there will be notables all over.

I think this is what should happen...

We vote for a notable as we usually do then vote a notable to be replaced by the new notable.

The retired thing sounds good.

It'll seperate the actives from the "missing assumed dead" lot.
Where's Sonic Rav nowdays?


Ashley's system would also do this, but would also slowly wipe the face of this forum's colourful history.
Also, if one of those notables do come back, well they'll be back like. :-)


Retired after a year is fine.
Enough time for them to be almost forgotten.
And then when they come back and breath some life into their account, you can light up their name again! :-)

How about we dump them all on an island, and we'll hopefully have a Lord of the Flies type situation with Rasta waving the conch and Sniper dying a Piggy-type death.

I like Ashley's suggestion but instead of the losing notable going back to the old purple they go to a different colour? Plus there shoudl be a notable list where anyone who was voted a notable gets there respect paid for ever more. But still think they should fire a notable or to would be great to see the reactions of everyone imagine the whole forum in uproar...or not who knows.

Logan's Run!
Logan's Run!
Logan's Run!
Logan's Run!

All we know is that he's got a weak-assed nephew who loves copyright laws.