The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
*Holds her ticket...ok not a ticket but the credit card she used on movietickets.com to buy a ticket*
Oooo!!
Oooo!!
Page:
I'm yet to be fully convinced by Dunst. The outstanding actor was Molina, I reckon.
Excellent, just how superhero movies should be. The whole point of having a superhero is that the guy under the mask has to be believable and have a life of his own; if he's punching crooks in the face every five minutes and acting like a chick magnet, why should we care?
Special effects were ace (does anyone else always look directly at the faces during the CG bits like me?), Dunst and Maguire are both great and James Franco is superb, a bit 'broody teenager' for me but still a good performance. And Dylan Baker will rule as The Lizard in Spidey 3 - the paedo-dad from Happiness is back, and he's coming for YOUR kids!
Special effects were ace (does anyone else always look directly at the faces during the CG bits like me?), Dunst and Maguire are both great and James Franco is superb, a bit 'broody teenager' for me but still a good performance. And Dylan Baker will rule as The Lizard in Spidey 3 - the paedo-dad from Happiness is back, and he's coming for YOUR kids!
Mystique wrote:
> It explained it all in the movie..didn't you watch it?
I watched it, discussed it with several people, and they all went 'OMFG! WTF! I FECXKING PWN J00 SPIDER-MAN'. And they all hated the movie.
I, however, quite enjoyed it.
Saw it Wednesday evening.
Anyways, yes, whatever is said, it needed more action. The fighting seemed more like a side plot rather than the main peice...
> It explained it all in the movie..didn't you watch it?
I watched it, discussed it with several people, and they all went 'OMFG! WTF! I FECXKING PWN J00 SPIDER-MAN'. And they all hated the movie.
I, however, quite enjoyed it.
Saw it Wednesday evening.
Anyways, yes, whatever is said, it needed more action. The fighting seemed more like a side plot rather than the main peice...
I didnt think it was that great, i still prefer x-men 2. i think theres something not right having toby maguire as spiderman, hes just too geeky!
Even from the trailers I figured it out.
It explained it all in the movie..didn't you watch it?
Creepy wrote:
> He looses his powers in most of the comics for a while . I think it's
> to do with lack of ambition...
I was guessing that, but it seems to have no point to it whatsoever. If it's going to put it in, at least put it in woith reason, and explain it.
> He looses his powers in most of the comics for a while . I think it's
> to do with lack of ambition...
I was guessing that, but it seems to have no point to it whatsoever. If it's going to put it in, at least put it in woith reason, and explain it.
Stryke wrote:
> OK, that wasn't meant to happen. Obviously.
Styyy-ryke three!
*awaits groans*
> OK, that wasn't meant to happen. Obviously.
Styyy-ryke three!
*awaits groans*
> -What relevance did Spidey losing his abilities have to the film?
He looses his powers in most of the comics for a while . I think it's to do with lack of ambition..
He looses his powers in most of the comics for a while . I think it's to do with lack of ambition..
Seen it 4 times.
Nuff said.
Nuff said.
Page: