The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I have enough money for a game, yipee, but i dont know what to get, either tales of symphonia or paper mario 2, which is better?
Page:
I have enough money for a game, yipee, but i dont know what to get, either tales of symphonia or paper mario 2, which is better?
Tales. Love Paper Mario, but Tales is more of a proper RPG, and if you've played Mario & Luigi/Paper Mario (N64)/Super Mario RPG you've seen it all before anyway.
kool, i heard tales aint that good on multiplayer, is this true *please say no*
Dunno, never played multiplayer. I can assure you it's better than on PM2, anyway.
Paper Mario 2, it's more fun and entertaining than the *yawn* Tales of Symphonia.
Proof that you haven't played Tales of Symphonia.
Ooo im stuck, cos i like the multiplayer idea but NOM give paper mario higher, but they give everything made by nintendo good, even if it aint.
I love PM2, but like I said, if you've played any of the other Mario RPG titles you've pretty much seen it all. Plus, Tales is much, much longer.
Rickoss wrote:
> Proof that you haven't played Tales of Symphonia.
Then again I thought the same thing about Skies. Epic RPG's are fun for the first 2 hours and then I get bored as I realise I'll be playing for so long before the game actually starts to get to a few points.
RPG's are big, they frustrate me and I don't USUALLY like them.
I prefer fun little RPG's, little things that entice you to do other things whilst playing the "adventure" and Nintendo are brilliant at that.
Pokemon and Paper Mario are my favourite RPG's of all time.
And Paper Mario 2 is just so incredible, there is so much to it I can barely begin to describe it. So much fun. I finished that game. Tales meanwhile, like Skies before it, was traded in.
> Proof that you haven't played Tales of Symphonia.
Then again I thought the same thing about Skies. Epic RPG's are fun for the first 2 hours and then I get bored as I realise I'll be playing for so long before the game actually starts to get to a few points.
RPG's are big, they frustrate me and I don't USUALLY like them.
I prefer fun little RPG's, little things that entice you to do other things whilst playing the "adventure" and Nintendo are brilliant at that.
Pokemon and Paper Mario are my favourite RPG's of all time.
And Paper Mario 2 is just so incredible, there is so much to it I can barely begin to describe it. So much fun. I finished that game. Tales meanwhile, like Skies before it, was traded in.
Rickoss wrote:
> I love PM2, but like I said, if you've played any of the other Mario
> RPG titles you've pretty much seen it all.
Rubbish, although the system is similar the game has so much more to it than any of the previous Mario RPG games. I have completed them all and I have to say I didn't think "been here done that" when I was playing the Glitzville competiton.
Plus, Tales is much,
> much longer.
Only because it lasts something stupid like 60 hours in comparison to PM 2's 20. I have to say I find Tales' length a negative point.
> I love PM2, but like I said, if you've played any of the other Mario
> RPG titles you've pretty much seen it all.
Rubbish, although the system is similar the game has so much more to it than any of the previous Mario RPG games. I have completed them all and I have to say I didn't think "been here done that" when I was playing the Glitzville competiton.
Plus, Tales is much,
> much longer.
Only because it lasts something stupid like 60 hours in comparison to PM 2's 20. I have to say I find Tales' length a negative point.
Page: