The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Go on, do it. Do it now.
England fans riot for the 2nd night in a row. What a surprise. I mean, I really thought that those banning orders and the co-operation between English and Portugese police would have prevented any trouble. No, wait, I didn't because this happens every single time.
See:
Burberry moron horde + beer + dirty foreigners taunting Burberry moron horde with their 'faaahny langwidge' and sophisticated ways = FIGHTS, BOTTLINGS, FLYING CHAIRS & UNPROVOKED ATTACK
And, surprise surprise, it's not the English fans fault. Burberry mouth opens: "Nah, guv'nor, nuffink to do wif us. Them police on their 'orses dun it. Truncheons flyin' everywhere. Bish bash bosh, right on me balls - how am I gonna impregnate my own sister now? I wanna breed more little hooli...FANS, you know? Bleedin' foreigners! I'll kill 'em, kill 'em all."
But there's more. BBC reporter - impartial, even-handed BBC reporter - talks over footage of mounted police dragging thugs from the riot:
"But there's blame on both sides."
No there bloody isn't! A mob of drunken thugs start flinging tables through windows. So that's England fans, not the police, who are breaking the law. The police have to respond. I've seen hooligans in action, there is only one way to deal with them, and it isn't saying, "Oh, so you've been throwing tables, intimidating and attacking people. Well, that's not very nice but let's think about WHY you threw that table. Let's talk about your feelings and your troubled childhood. Why are you biting me?"
Hooligans in a group want a fight, and they'll pick one with inanimate objects, innocent bystanders or the police. And once they have picked a fight then I've got no problem with the police charging in to protect innocent people and their property. If some gormless lout gets truncheoned upside the head and lands in hospital then good, he deserved it. And if some innocent England fan also gets truncheoned upside the head then...well, ooops, sorry mate, but ask yourself this: what were you doing in a mob of baying hooligans? It's blatantly obvious when trouble is about to kick off: walk away, find another bar.
But this happens every time. And unless something changes then we'll see the same riots and fights in Germany in 2006 - because England get followed around Europe by violent, intimidating thugs.
So kick England out of the tournament. People might learn their lesson. Not the thugs, who are incapable of learning, but the other people, who tolerate English supporters singing "I'd rather be a p*ki than a Turk". Kick them out. Kick them out. Kick them out now.
England fans riot for the 2nd night in a row. What a surprise. I mean, I really thought that those banning orders and the co-operation between English and Portugese police would have prevented any trouble. No, wait, I didn't because this happens every single time.
See:
Burberry moron horde + beer + dirty foreigners taunting Burberry moron horde with their 'faaahny langwidge' and sophisticated ways = FIGHTS, BOTTLINGS, FLYING CHAIRS & UNPROVOKED ATTACK
And, surprise surprise, it's not the English fans fault. Burberry mouth opens: "Nah, guv'nor, nuffink to do wif us. Them police on their 'orses dun it. Truncheons flyin' everywhere. Bish bash bosh, right on me balls - how am I gonna impregnate my own sister now? I wanna breed more little hooli...FANS, you know? Bleedin' foreigners! I'll kill 'em, kill 'em all."
But there's more. BBC reporter - impartial, even-handed BBC reporter - talks over footage of mounted police dragging thugs from the riot:
"But there's blame on both sides."
No there bloody isn't! A mob of drunken thugs start flinging tables through windows. So that's England fans, not the police, who are breaking the law. The police have to respond. I've seen hooligans in action, there is only one way to deal with them, and it isn't saying, "Oh, so you've been throwing tables, intimidating and attacking people. Well, that's not very nice but let's think about WHY you threw that table. Let's talk about your feelings and your troubled childhood. Why are you biting me?"
Hooligans in a group want a fight, and they'll pick one with inanimate objects, innocent bystanders or the police. And once they have picked a fight then I've got no problem with the police charging in to protect innocent people and their property. If some gormless lout gets truncheoned upside the head and lands in hospital then good, he deserved it. And if some innocent England fan also gets truncheoned upside the head then...well, ooops, sorry mate, but ask yourself this: what were you doing in a mob of baying hooligans? It's blatantly obvious when trouble is about to kick off: walk away, find another bar.
But this happens every time. And unless something changes then we'll see the same riots and fights in Germany in 2006 - because England get followed around Europe by violent, intimidating thugs.
So kick England out of the tournament. People might learn their lesson. Not the thugs, who are incapable of learning, but the other people, who tolerate English supporters singing "I'd rather be a p*ki than a Turk". Kick them out. Kick them out. Kick them out now.
Page:
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Couldn't have said it better myself, bingo.
>
> Your whole argument against me throwing pointless insults back fires
> as you completely avoid the point.
>
> Your double standards amuse me greatly, boy.
!!!!!!!!!!!
"I don't avoid posts"
You genius you. And you have zero, zip, nadda - in case you need reminding.
> Couldn't have said it better myself, bingo.
>
> Your whole argument against me throwing pointless insults back fires
> as you completely avoid the point.
>
> Your double standards amuse me greatly, boy.
!!!!!!!!!!!
"I don't avoid posts"
You genius you. And you have zero, zip, nadda - in case you need reminding.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
> What does that have to do with the original discussion?
>
> Nearly as much as this post. Sweet hypocrisy.
Yes. I'm a hypocrite for mentioning how things have went off topic and trying to put the thread back on track.
...
Maybe you should look in a dictionary.
> Memorandum! wrote:
> What does that have to do with the original discussion?
>
> Nearly as much as this post. Sweet hypocrisy.
Yes. I'm a hypocrite for mentioning how things have went off topic and trying to put the thread back on track.
...
Maybe you should look in a dictionary.
Azul wrote:
> Aah, typical arrogant English w****r. Yet omg, how many points do you
> have?
> Bingo.
Couldn't have said it better myself, bingo.
Your whole argument against me throwing pointless insults back fires as you completely avoid the point.
Your double standards amuse me greatly, boy.
> Aah, typical arrogant English w****r. Yet omg, how many points do you
> have?
> Bingo.
Couldn't have said it better myself, bingo.
Your whole argument against me throwing pointless insults back fires as you completely avoid the point.
Your double standards amuse me greatly, boy.
England shouldn't be chucked out. It's only a minority that are causing trouble, admitedly this happens all the time and does give England a bad reputation, but the majority shouldn't have to suffer because of a small amount of idiots that only go to cause trouble.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Azul wrote:
> You lose, you go mental.
> Aaah.
>
> Yet we are there and have looked by far the best team
Aah, stereotypical arrogant English w****r. Yet omg, how many points do you have?
Bingo.
> Where are Scotland again?
Even more retarded. We didn't qualify, actually, because we're rather crap at football.
> they are pretty much a useless nation.
What's that you're watching the footie on?
Oh, and what's that you're telling your, albeit randomly chosen through phonebook friends, about England getting pished on?
And that thing with the Queen's head on it that you shove on stamps?
Not to mention Edinburgh being the leader in anaethestics when it was first ever considered, and making ground breaking, erm, breakthroughs.
And pneumatic tyres. And a cure for scurvy. And fax machines. And the first cloned mammal. And indeed Halloween. And syringes. And penicillin. And fridges. And the steam engine. And economics. And, and, and.
The list is practically endless.
Do think before you mash your face into that keyboard of your's.
> Azul wrote:
> You lose, you go mental.
> Aaah.
>
> Yet we are there and have looked by far the best team
Aah, stereotypical arrogant English w****r. Yet omg, how many points do you have?
Bingo.
> Where are Scotland again?
Even more retarded. We didn't qualify, actually, because we're rather crap at football.
> they are pretty much a useless nation.
What's that you're watching the footie on?
Oh, and what's that you're telling your, albeit randomly chosen through phonebook friends, about England getting pished on?
And that thing with the Queen's head on it that you shove on stamps?
Not to mention Edinburgh being the leader in anaethestics when it was first ever considered, and making ground breaking, erm, breakthroughs.
And pneumatic tyres. And a cure for scurvy. And fax machines. And the first cloned mammal. And indeed Halloween. And syringes. And penicillin. And fridges. And the steam engine. And economics. And, and, and.
The list is practically endless.
Do think before you mash your face into that keyboard of your's.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
> (since we're getting so petty)
>
> You said it darling.
But, I mean...capital letters...that's scraping the bottom of the barrel, surely?
> Memorandum! wrote:
> (since we're getting so petty)
>
> You said it darling.
But, I mean...capital letters...that's scraping the bottom of the barrel, surely?
Memorandum! wrote:
> What does that have to do with the original discussion?
Nearly as much as this post. Sweet hypocrisy.
> What does that have to do with the original discussion?
Nearly as much as this post. Sweet hypocrisy.
Memorandum! wrote:
> (since we're getting so petty)
You said it darling.
> (since we're getting so petty)
You said it darling.
Hedfix wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
>
> What does that have to do with the original discussion?
>
> I'm sorry... this is a discussion?
It was.
> Memorandum! wrote:
>
> What does that have to do with the original discussion?
>
> I'm sorry... this is a discussion?
It was.
Azul wrote:
> I am indeed waiting.
Ever heard of reading between the lines, actually thinking about something?
You posted it as if it actually meant something. Okay I will change it.
Your post was nearly as laughable as Mr. Blatters weekly attempts to have a go at English football. If you knew anything about football you would be fully aware that UEFA said this to stir things up. They won't throw England out and as such; in relation to the original post I couldn't give a monkeys about the riots.
> I am indeed waiting.
Ever heard of reading between the lines, actually thinking about something?
You posted it as if it actually meant something. Okay I will change it.
Your post was nearly as laughable as Mr. Blatters weekly attempts to have a go at English football. If you knew anything about football you would be fully aware that UEFA said this to stir things up. They won't throw England out and as such; in relation to the original post I couldn't give a monkeys about the riots.
Page: