Viewing Thread:
"Wakka = 100% Spam"

I new this guy was a spammer but this just takes the p!ss. In the last 30 days he's posted an average 226.6 words a post compared to Forest Fan (2nd) who has an average of 27.9 words a post. Everyone can see that he doesn't actually write that many words a post so why is he still not banned?

Surely SR, you can see this? Right?

Can't you just ban him from using the edit button so he can't do his spamming trick?

Wakka wrote:
> Surely if I was spamming, SR would have noticed and at least warned
> me?

Whereas I've cursed at practically every single member of these forums (except Timmargh - he's so adorable!), yet I haven't been warned once.
Hmm.

I dont care.

*stands up*

:P

So Wakka, if you're not spamming. Can you prove the facts wrong?

I thought something like that might happen when the edit function came out, but seriously though, what harm is it doing? Does anyone really care (apart from Wakka) that much about how many words everyone has posted?

Stand Up if you think Wakka should be banned.

Surely if I was spamming, SR would have noticed and at least warned me?

I new this guy was a spammer but this just takes the p!ss. In the last 30 days he's posted an average 226.6 words a post compared to Forest Fan (2nd) who has an average of 27.9 words a post. Everyone can see that he doesn't actually write that many words a post so why is he still not banned?

Surely SR, you can see this? Right?

Can't you just ban him from using the edit button so he can't do his spamming trick?