Viewing Thread:
"Wakka = 100% Spam"

I new this guy was a spammer but this just takes the p!ss. In the last 30 days he's posted an average 226.6 words a post compared to Forest Fan (2nd) who has an average of 27.9 words a post. Everyone can see that he doesn't actually write that many words a post so why is he still not banned?

Surely SR, you can see this? Right?

Can't you just ban him from using the edit button so he can't do his spamming trick?

@ng3l wrote:
> Click report this post button and have done with it.

The problem is, he edits his post before the staffies get a chance to see it.

does not matter how many words anybody does, or who can be at the top of the top posters boards like most seem to aim for. What matters is quality, not quantity. The effort people put in to there topics and posts is far more interesting on the eye.

There are many people that moan on here about spelling, then think its a good idea to do a post about it. Someone will get on someone's nerves and they do a post about them. I have seen a lot of pathetic pointless posts that are not even worth the time of day.

The other thing is there the posts people respond to. No matter how much someone spam's we encourage it by adding our comments. Not only has this person got our attention for the amount of views it has but also its getting loads of response. That's what they want and thats what they get.

Also i am sure if there is a problem and SR does not like something they will do something about it as and when they see fit. Instead of us all spamming by adding a post saying So and So should be banned, so and so is spamming etc..

if a post is unreasonable then:- *edited for the smart ass!

Click report this post button and have done with it.

*see what i mean i have responded to this pointless topic, we all do it!

Azul wrote:
> Paradox: wrote:
> *blows kisses*
>
> *Dramatic slow-mo diving interception*

Heh

*catches kisses and wipes them on @rse*

HA! (In Edna voice) Teaches you not to call me scum :P

Wakka wrote:
> Surely if I was spamming, SR would have noticed and at least warned
> me?

They have. Twice.

Paradox: wrote:
> *blows kisses*

*Dramatic slow-mo diving interception*

ßulle†† wrote:
> I can't believe you even had him on your list anyway.

*shrivels up in the corner*

He forced me...

Azul wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> Surely if I was spamming, SR would have noticed and at least warned
> me?
>
> Whereas I've cursed at practically every single member of these
> forums (except Timmargh - he's so adorable!), yet I haven't been
> warned once.
> Hmm.

I've been warned 3 times ahahahahha.

Once for swearing (I think).
Once for the dolphin.
Once for my 'general attitude'.

I rock.

I can't believe you even had him on your list anyway.

Ashman wrote:

> Do you think blocking him is worth it? Surely if he wants you banned
> he doesn't care whether you are on his contact list or not.

Heh true.

He just asked me on MSN why I wanted him banned, I ignom, then he starts to post loads of letters (spam), so I typed "Bye Bye Wakka" and blocked him.

Hahahaha!