The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I new this guy was a spammer but this just takes the p!ss. In the last 30 days he's posted an average 226.6 words a post compared to Forest Fan (2nd) who has an average of 27.9 words a post. Everyone can see that he doesn't actually write that many words a post so why is he still not banned?
Surely SR, you can see this? Right?
Can't you just ban him from using the edit button so he can't do his spamming trick?
Surely SR, you can see this? Right?
Can't you just ban him from using the edit button so he can't do his spamming trick?
Page:
Damarus wrote:
> Paradox: wrote:
> Damarus = scum
>
> Why thank you kind Sir.
you know I love you really
*blows kisses*
> Paradox: wrote:
> Damarus = scum
>
> Why thank you kind Sir.
you know I love you really
*blows kisses*
Wakka wrote:
> Hmm.... so you want me to get banned? *blocks*
Do you think blocking him is worth it? Surely if he wants you banned he doesn't care whether you are on his contact list or not.
> Hmm.... so you want me to get banned? *blocks*
Do you think blocking him is worth it? Surely if he wants you banned he doesn't care whether you are on his contact list or not.
Paradox: wrote:
> Damarus = scum
Why thank you kind Sir.
> Damarus = scum
Why thank you kind Sir.
Damarus = scum
Stridman wrote:
> I dont care.
>
> *stands up*
>
> :P
Hmm.... so you want me to get banned? *blocks*
> I dont care.
>
> *stands up*
>
> :P
Hmm.... so you want me to get banned? *blocks*
*claps*
Some things are appropriate, like Azul's cursing.
Others are completely inappropriate, like your presence, Wakka.
Others are completely inappropriate, like your presence, Wakka.
Damarus wrote:
> So Wakka, if you're not spamming. Can you prove the facts wrong?
SR very rarely ban Regulars though so I cant see them getting rid of Wakka.
They're too soft.
(I dont know why I quoted this post, sowwy)
> So Wakka, if you're not spamming. Can you prove the facts wrong?
SR very rarely ban Regulars though so I cant see them getting rid of Wakka.
They're too soft.
(I dont know why I quoted this post, sowwy)
Wakka wrote:
> Surely if I was spamming, SR would have noticed and at least warned
> me?
You were warned for something, i dont know what though.
> Surely if I was spamming, SR would have noticed and at least warned
> me?
You were warned for something, i dont know what though.
I've never seen SR take action against someone who edits out huge amounts of spamming, however I have seen over 17 users do the same thing. Even NBiggles did it a few times, but I think he's fed up with it being abused so much. Now the word count is useless.
Page: