The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/3785785.stm[/URL]
Some little f**ker gets what's coming to him, his Dad should be grateful.
Some little f**ker gets what's coming to him, his Dad should be grateful.
Page:
Depends how fast the car was going and the area it was in.
Kid was stupid to throw them at the car but he's a kid and they do stupid things like that from time to time. Dosn't mean he should have been given a beating by the man.
To settle it the boys dad and the driver should fight. :-P
Kid was stupid to throw them at the car but he's a kid and they do stupid things like that from time to time. Dosn't mean he should have been given a beating by the man.
To settle it the boys dad and the driver should fight. :-P
@ng3l wrote:
but beating a child is
> absolutely wrong.
It isn't though. Used properly, it works. How many things do you think that kids going to throw at cars now?
Fact is, one good smack in the face has done more than any amount of 'rehabiliting' or 'encouraging proper growth' ever would.
> After all 2 wrongs dont make a right!
I think this just did..
but beating a child is
> absolutely wrong.
It isn't though. Used properly, it works. How many things do you think that kids going to throw at cars now?
Fact is, one good smack in the face has done more than any amount of 'rehabiliting' or 'encouraging proper growth' ever would.
> After all 2 wrongs dont make a right!
I think this just did..
My opinion is that it isn't right what that man did, HOWEVER I don't feel sympathy for the child as he could have distracted the other man enough to cause an accident. Round here there are a lot of youths that hang around on the bridge and chuck stuff at the cars, some woman and her baby died in a car crash when something was thrown at them, so there are serious dangers and I can see where the father is coming from. I don't agree with what the man did and it is wrong, but maybe this will show the boy how serious the problem could potentially turn out if he uses something else, besides a water bomb...
Yes both parties are seriously in the wrong, but one is a kid and the other is an adult.
I hope that my kid dont grow up to be a rebel. I will do my best to teach him whats right from wrong but i cant control him. If he does wrong then i will do whats right in making sure he learns from his mistakes, but harming him wont be the answer. He will then think thats ok to go round beating people black and blue whaen clearly its wrong.
Flock wrote:
> I think i did the same, there aren't many things that can really get
> me angry but thats one of them, i'm extremely protective of the
> people i care about, as they are few and far between.
Very true. I don't have kids, but if someone's well being that I cared about (as you say, they are few and far between) was threatened by a child throwing something at a fast moving chunk of metal, I'd be just as protective and angry.
Both parties in this case need to have a few things explained I think. The child that its not clever to chuck stuff at cars, and the adult taught not to be so aggressive. :)
> I think i did the same, there aren't many things that can really get
> me angry but thats one of them, i'm extremely protective of the
> people i care about, as they are few and far between.
Very true. I don't have kids, but if someone's well being that I cared about (as you say, they are few and far between) was threatened by a child throwing something at a fast moving chunk of metal, I'd be just as protective and angry.
Both parties in this case need to have a few things explained I think. The child that its not clever to chuck stuff at cars, and the adult taught not to be so aggressive. :)
If that kid done that to me i would have mashed him good and proper.
*Stirs it up*
*Stirs it up*
@ng3l wrote:
> The Kid
>
> First thing that comes to mind is idiot. Throwing things at cars is
> wrong. I dont care if it was a water bomb,
He was only keeping alive the spirit of Dennis the Menace.
;)
> The Kid
>
> First thing that comes to mind is idiot. Throwing things at cars is
> wrong. I dont care if it was a water bomb,
He was only keeping alive the spirit of Dennis the Menace.
;)
The Kid
First thing that comes to mind is idiot. Throwing things at cars is wrong. I dont care if it was a water bomb, stones or bricks what he did was out of order. If a car was travelling and see Something coming unaware of what it was and swerved he could have caused alot of damage and injuries, or even a death. The kid should have known better then to even consider throwing things.
The Driver
"loser" Spelt it right this time Should know better then to do that to a child. Shout and ball at the kid yeah but to knock ten bells out him was out of order.
If anyone ever raised a hand to my child then i would go F***ing crazy. I would punish my kid in my own way but beating a child is absolutely wrong. The kid deserves a telling off and a talking to about the dangers of throwing things at traffic.
After all 2 wrongs dont make a right!
First thing that comes to mind is idiot. Throwing things at cars is wrong. I dont care if it was a water bomb, stones or bricks what he did was out of order. If a car was travelling and see Something coming unaware of what it was and swerved he could have caused alot of damage and injuries, or even a death. The kid should have known better then to even consider throwing things.
The Driver
"loser" Spelt it right this time Should know better then to do that to a child. Shout and ball at the kid yeah but to knock ten bells out him was out of order.
If anyone ever raised a hand to my child then i would go F***ing crazy. I would punish my kid in my own way but beating a child is absolutely wrong. The kid deserves a telling off and a talking to about the dangers of throwing things at traffic.
After all 2 wrongs dont make a right!
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> you shouldn't think i'd let him get away with it though,
> far from it but i would seriously object to anyone touching my
> children.
>
> Conceeded. Sorry if I came on a bit strong.
I think i did the same, there aren't many things that can really get me angry but thats one of them, i'm extremely protective of the people i care about, as they are few and far between.
> Flock wrote:
> you shouldn't think i'd let him get away with it though,
> far from it but i would seriously object to anyone touching my
> children.
>
> Conceeded. Sorry if I came on a bit strong.
I think i did the same, there aren't many things that can really get me angry but thats one of them, i'm extremely protective of the people i care about, as they are few and far between.
Page: