Viewing Thread:
"Forrest Fan - A Question"

I know everyone is fed-up with FF on this forum and about how every topic appears to gravitate towards him and his beliefs, but I have a genuine question for him.

If the Bible is all fact, as you have repeatedly claimed, then how can their be two creation stories, Genesis 1 & 2?

RastaBillySkank wrote:

> Why (in Genesis 1 I think) is women created after and from man, yet
> in the other man and women are created at the same time?

"The LORD God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. The man said, "This is now bone of my bones, And flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman, Because she was taken out of Man." Genesis 2:22-23

Explain.

Paradox wrote:
> something funny

Heh :-D

Forest Fan wrote:
> Genesis 2 only provides a more in depth look at the Creation of man
> and woman, found in Genesis 1 and further completes the account.

But in that case, why do they contradict eachother?

Why (in Genesis 1 I think) is women created after and from man, yet in the other man and women are created at the same time?

Paradox: wrote:
> RBS, the answer is simple.
>
> All good fiction has a sequel.

Very clever comment, but I shall laugh at you down from Heaven.

{:)

RBS, the answer is simple.

All good fiction has a sequel.

If he has his beliefs i think you should respect that. Just like he should stop forcing his beliefs onto you!

Job.

Also, where are the dinosaurs mentioned in the bible?

Just when all the Forest Fan threads were settling down too.

Why do you guys bother? Just don't rattle his cage.

He's not genuinely religious anyway, he's contradicted himself loads of times and his posts are designed to wind people up, not discuss any challenging points raised. Blatant baiting and avoiding difficult questions because he doesn't care about the answers.

Ans his longer posts are all pasted and stolen from other web sites. Sometimes he passes them off as his own work, since being called on breaking a commandment (stealing, of intellectual property) he tends to acknowledge his source now, but it's still just mindless ctl-c ctl-v, with no real thought, understanding or belief.

So just leave him alone. He doesn't genuinely care about what you say, he's just trying to wind you up.


And even if he was genuinely religious, he's been argued into a corner, where you'd expect him to conceed defeat, countless times already.
Every time he just ignores the issue.
If his beliefs were genuine, you can't show him where they're flawed or self-contradictory, as he chooses not to see your point.


Let sleeping bellends lie.

mattributé wrote:
> And if God's all forgiving, what's the point in being religious?

God is all forgiving, but like I have said time and time before, we have to take the iniative to ask Jesus to cover our sins.