The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I know everyone is fed-up with FF on this forum and about how every topic appears to gravitate towards him and his beliefs, but I have a genuine question for him.
If the Bible is all fact, as you have repeatedly claimed, then how can their be two creation stories, Genesis 1 & 2?
If the Bible is all fact, as you have repeatedly claimed, then how can their be two creation stories, Genesis 1 & 2?
Page:
I know everyone is fed-up with FF on this forum and about how every topic appears to gravitate towards him and his beliefs, but I have a genuine question for him.
If the Bible is all fact, as you have repeatedly claimed, then how can their be two creation stories, Genesis 1 & 2?
If the Bible is all fact, as you have repeatedly claimed, then how can their be two creation stories, Genesis 1 & 2?
And if God's all forgiving, what's the point in being religious?
Cue smug "Ooh look, another topic about me." gaff from FF.
But while we're here, riddle me this:
The Bible says man is foolish and sinful,
In which case, the men who wrote the Bible are foolish and sinful,
In which case, they cannot be trusted to tell the truth,
In which case, the Bible could be false,
In which case, man isn't foolish or sinful at all,
In which case, the men who wrote the Bible can be trusted,
In which case, the Bible is true,
In which case, man is foolish and sinful.
etc.
But while we're here, riddle me this:
The Bible says man is foolish and sinful,
In which case, the men who wrote the Bible are foolish and sinful,
In which case, they cannot be trusted to tell the truth,
In which case, the Bible could be false,
In which case, man isn't foolish or sinful at all,
In which case, the men who wrote the Bible can be trusted,
In which case, the Bible is true,
In which case, man is foolish and sinful.
etc.
Let's burn those bibles, people!
Good news? I'll give you good news, sucker.
Good news? I'll give you good news, sucker.
RastaBillySkank wrote:
> I know everyone is fed-up with FF on this forum and about how every
> topic appears to gravitate towards him and his beliefs, but I have a
> genuine question for him.
Well I haven't had many questions from yourself.
>
> If the Bible is all fact, as you have repeatedly claimed, then how
> can their be two creation stories, Genesis 1 & 2?
Genesis 2 only provides a more in depth look at the Creation of man and woman, found in Genesis 1 and further completes the account.
> I know everyone is fed-up with FF on this forum and about how every
> topic appears to gravitate towards him and his beliefs, but I have a
> genuine question for him.
Well I haven't had many questions from yourself.
>
> If the Bible is all fact, as you have repeatedly claimed, then how
> can their be two creation stories, Genesis 1 & 2?
Genesis 2 only provides a more in depth look at the Creation of man and woman, found in Genesis 1 and further completes the account.
mattributé wrote:
> And if God's all forgiving, what's the point in being religious?
God is all forgiving, but like I have said time and time before, we have to take the iniative to ask Jesus to cover our sins.
> And if God's all forgiving, what's the point in being religious?
God is all forgiving, but like I have said time and time before, we have to take the iniative to ask Jesus to cover our sins.
Why do you guys bother? Just don't rattle his cage.
He's not genuinely religious anyway, he's contradicted himself loads of times and his posts are designed to wind people up, not discuss any challenging points raised. Blatant baiting and avoiding difficult questions because he doesn't care about the answers.
Ans his longer posts are all pasted and stolen from other web sites. Sometimes he passes them off as his own work, since being called on breaking a commandment (stealing, of intellectual property) he tends to acknowledge his source now, but it's still just mindless ctl-c ctl-v, with no real thought, understanding or belief.
So just leave him alone. He doesn't genuinely care about what you say, he's just trying to wind you up.
And even if he was genuinely religious, he's been argued into a corner, where you'd expect him to conceed defeat, countless times already.
Every time he just ignores the issue.
If his beliefs were genuine, you can't show him where they're flawed or self-contradictory, as he chooses not to see your point.
Let sleeping bellends lie.
He's not genuinely religious anyway, he's contradicted himself loads of times and his posts are designed to wind people up, not discuss any challenging points raised. Blatant baiting and avoiding difficult questions because he doesn't care about the answers.
Ans his longer posts are all pasted and stolen from other web sites. Sometimes he passes them off as his own work, since being called on breaking a commandment (stealing, of intellectual property) he tends to acknowledge his source now, but it's still just mindless ctl-c ctl-v, with no real thought, understanding or belief.
So just leave him alone. He doesn't genuinely care about what you say, he's just trying to wind you up.
And even if he was genuinely religious, he's been argued into a corner, where you'd expect him to conceed defeat, countless times already.
Every time he just ignores the issue.
If his beliefs were genuine, you can't show him where they're flawed or self-contradictory, as he chooses not to see your point.
Let sleeping bellends lie.
Just when all the Forest Fan threads were settling down too.
Also, where are the dinosaurs mentioned in the bible?
Job.
Page: