The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Before I start, I want you to know I'm not being bitter. Not at all. I'm simply utterly confused, bamboozled, bemused, bewildered - whatever. I instantly know as I type this, I'll get the flourish of "omg ur jst cryin cuz u dint win!1".
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Page:
azul over the past month...
everwhere i have seen you pop up you have turned into a whiney lil scots men...
what happened to the cute azully that giggled and cained my gingerness - we talked bout girls and the sunset...
now? nada
ssssssssssssh young man, kyles work was clever and amusing. It must of taken him ages and there was no 'one' picture - what do you expect of a paint drawing huh huh?
Stoppayamoaninman
everwhere i have seen you pop up you have turned into a whiney lil scots men...
what happened to the cute azully that giggled and cained my gingerness - we talked bout girls and the sunset...
now? nada
ssssssssssssh young man, kyles work was clever and amusing. It must of taken him ages and there was no 'one' picture - what do you expect of a paint drawing huh huh?
Stoppayamoaninman
So? I won. I dont care who anyone else thinks should have won.
Did ashman enter his ?
I remember him sending me a preview on msn and i thought it was fantastic.
I remember him sending me a preview on msn and i thought it was fantastic.
He must be laughing to the burgulars outside his garage door fr winning with such a pile of cack.
It should be able how good the damn drawing was, and well, Para's was just a paint job, not much talent at all, to be honest.
Sorry, Para, but there are people a lot more deserving of the EGAD than yourself.
Sorry, Para, but there are people a lot more deserving of the EGAD than yourself.
If effort was all that counted, I'd have been in the school fiirst team. But seeing as I'm only a slightly above-average footballer (school-wise terms).
It shouldnt've been about effort, though, it should've been about ability, and myself, Azul and others were far higher achieving than Para in that department.
I sucked up to Fosco and he liked it; that and the handjob I gave him.
@ng3l wrote:
> Obviousley Paradox created
> something that caught the eye of the judge
What, how generic it all was? The fact it looked like a 5 year old drew them? The use of about 5 colours?
SR don't reward effort. They reward retards.
No offence, para.
> Obviousley Paradox created
> something that caught the eye of the judge
What, how generic it all was? The fact it looked like a 5 year old drew them? The use of about 5 colours?
SR don't reward effort. They reward retards.
No offence, para.
I think the fact that Kyle made a website also indicated further effort to them. They said in the start up thread that people who have shown a lot of effort and/or unique ideas such as making the fosco.tk website will have a good chance.
Oh well, I thought I had a half chance but I really don't see the point in complaining.
Oh well, I thought I had a half chance but I really don't see the point in complaining.
Page: