The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Before I start, I want you to know I'm not being bitter. Not at all. I'm simply utterly confused, bamboozled, bemused, bewildered - whatever. I instantly know as I type this, I'll get the flourish of "omg ur jst cryin cuz u dint win!1".
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Not at all.
I just really cannot understand how a paint job - and so poor a paint job at that - won. Excluding my own, there were plenty of other great if not better efforts. They looked better, more effort was made, and they generally didn't look utter cockshank.
I mean, part of the incoherently thrown together concoction of, to be honest, pish-poor drawings, was this -- [URL]http://www.geocities.com/thekyzzone3/footballfosco.JPG[/URL]
Sorry, but come on. That is blindingly poor. It looks as if it were drawn by a retarded Himalayan gorilla with the intelligence of a teaspoon, and the mental capacity of a pencil.
Just to reiterate for those with a memory span of a finger nail (which is the majority of you), this is not meant to be a whiny ar**d post. Just a statement of my complete and utter confusion at how such, and to steal Nashy's word, 'cockshank' won.
Para's submissions: [URL]http://fosco.tk[/URL]
My own: [URL]http://firestorm.staghosting.com/images/other/tontysketch.jpg[/URL]
I'd like your honest opinion here.
Which do you believe is the better drawing(s)? I really wouldn't have put such effort in if I knew the former link would win.
What a way to waste more than a week of valuable revision time.
I'm still sure I'll get the barrage of "omg ur crap cuz u dint win!11392", and "but omg it woz para!1 ur jst jelus!1".
To this I say, shut up and open your eyes.
Freakin' morons.
At least my picture made sense in the slightest. And at least I could spell "Tony", rather than "omg sherrrighef".
Hmmm.
And please, oh please - don't try and guilt trip me because of my insulting of those utterly retarded...things, because it's plain to see.
They're boll*cks.
I tried so very hard to like your entries Kyz, I really did. I tried three times, but failed each time due to the fact that I failed to go not 10 seconds without feeling the need to bludgeon my own head with a knife in an attempt to rid my mind of the images.
Bah.
Not bitter. Honest.
Page:
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> If you're stupid enough to spend a week of revision time drawing a
> picture of Tony for some dumb little competition, then you don't
> deserve to win, moron. And if wasn't down to who drew the best, most
> realistic drawing. It was whose was the most fun.
My point exactly!
> If you're stupid enough to spend a week of revision time drawing a
> picture of Tony for some dumb little competition, then you don't
> deserve to win, moron. And if wasn't down to who drew the best, most
> realistic drawing. It was whose was the most fun.
My point exactly!
But was Azul's/Picasso's picture really in the spirit on the contest? Whilst he may have slogged away tirelessly at his easel to produce something worth of hanging in a gallery, it probably wasnt the sort of thing SR were looking for. Now Azul, I did say to you on msn that I thought your picture was incredibly good, no doubt you are a talented artist and there is no arguing that what you produced bears mroe artistic merit that the tri-colour pictures I produced in Paint. I feel that an onslaught against me 'rubbish' drawings just because they happened to win is rather unjust.
If you're stupid enough to spend a week of revision time drawing a picture of Tony for some dumb little competition, then you don't deserve to win, moron. And if wasn't down to who drew the best, most realistic drawing. It was whose was the most fun.
No, I didn't mean it in an insulting way, just making sure you doing make the mistake again, as, no doubt, you'll get abused for it.
You tard.
You tard.
@ng3l wrote:
> God it just seems like your all bad loosers. Hate been proven that
> your not the best in everyones eyes. Get a Grip!
But many drawings WERE better than Para's. FACT. But they're assuming that because he made a website, he somehow made more effort. How long does it take to contruct a poor website? 5-10 minutes?
> God it just seems like your all bad loosers. Hate been proven that
> your not the best in everyones eyes. Get a Grip!
But many drawings WERE better than Para's. FACT. But they're assuming that because he made a website, he somehow made more effort. How long does it take to contruct a poor website? 5-10 minutes?
mattributé wrote:
> @ng3l wrote:
> been
>
> being*
Wow see nobodys perfect!
> @ng3l wrote:
> been
>
> being*
Wow see nobodys perfect!
@ng3l wrote:
> been
being*
> been
being*
I didnt even enter a picture.
But it just amazes me how SR always seem to reward the less able of society.
And I think Azul has a right to moan. Have you seen his drawing compared to Paras?
But it just amazes me how SR always seem to reward the less able of society.
And I think Azul has a right to moan. Have you seen his drawing compared to Paras?
Lil Ginge wrote:
> everwhere i have seen you pop up you have turned into a whiney lil
> scots men...
Ahaha. Azul's been multiplying, eh?
> everwhere i have seen you pop up you have turned into a whiney lil
> scots men...
Ahaha. Azul's been multiplying, eh?
God it just seems like your all bad loosers. Hate been proven that your not the best in everyones eyes. Get a Grip!
Page: