Viewing Thread:
"Is this gay . . . ?"

Is it gay to be a man and own Friends DVD's?

Right.

I originally said;

"It wouldn't have gone strong for 10 straight years if it wasn't funny and poorly written etc."

You're saying Neighbours has been going strong for 10 years? Do shut up.

Secondly, Friends really isn't poorly written. It really isn't. Millions upon millions of other people agree with me.

Thirdly, you're an idiot.

Tadaaa.

Azul wrote:
> I really do not think so. The ratings themselve prove that.

As I said, find them and prove that Neighbours isn't popular. You said that a 10 year old series gonig strong would not be poorly written, I gave you an example and you can't provide the facts to say otherwise, well done.

> I really am laughin at your complete and utter idiocy.

Yes the same can be said.

And also...

"Manchester Evening News Monday May 9, 1988
by Pete Anderson"

Ahaha. 1988.
15 years ago.

Hardly a credible source.

What a load of balls.

Neighbours? Taking Britain by storm?

I really do not think so. The ratings themselve prove that.


And hey, let's get back to the main point, shall we?
You're trying to argue, it'd seem, that Neighbours is as worldy popular and dominant as Friends.

I really am laughin at your complete and utter idiocy.

"The Down Under soap hasn't just taken Britain by storm - it's sweeping the world. America, Africa, the Far East and several other countries in Europe all want to climb on the Ramsay Street bandwagon. It costs only £100,000 a week to produce - peanuts compared with the multi-million dollar American soaps, but it's beating them hands down. It's a far cry from the day when Aussie TV bosses axed the show six months after it started in 1985. But another channel snapped it up and the rest is a TV success story."

[URL]http://www.ramsay-street.co.uk/articles/men/m880509.htm[/URL]

For the rest read there and for the record, get you facts straight you silly sod.

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Azul wrote:
> And besides - how do you know for a fact it's going strongly? Since
> when did you live in Australia?
>
> I find this hilariously hypocritical, in the same way I would love to
> know how you know it isn't, please tell...

Sorry - but you are, in fact, a friggin' moron.

"In the same way"

Yuhuh. Do you even read what you write?
And I find it equally hypocritical concerning the Scottish comment considering that you're the one spouting the good brown stuff.

Azul wrote:
> Please, for I would love it so.
> Point out where I've said it isn't popular in Australia.
> Please.

Eh?

I love the way you selectively miss out the MAIN point.

You said Neighbours isn't popular World Wide, I asked you to prove it which you clearly can't.

I would tell you to shut up but I think it is physically impossible for a Scottish person to shut his mouth.

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Azul wrote:
> Er.
> No.
>
> Prove it, you seem to think you know so much about it, or not.

Well considering the fact that when the cast of Friends signed this particular deal, it was well publicised around the globe...

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Azul wrote:
> And besides - how do you know for a fact it's going strongly? Since
> when did you live in Australia?
>
> I find this hilariously hypocritical, in the same way I would love to
> know how you know it isn't, please tell...

ARRRRRRGVHHHHHHHH

Please, for I would love it so.
Point out where I've said it isn't popular in Australia.
Please.

I'll moisten myself if you do.

Fact. Neighbours hasn't been going strong for 10 years in the United Kingdom nor the USA - the two most dominant English speaking nations in television broadcasting.

So shut up.
:)

Azul wrote:
> Er.
> No.

Prove it, you seem to think you know so much about it, or not.