The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Is it gay to be a man and own Friends DVD's?
Page:
I only ever used to watch Neigbours because.... Oh wait, I didn't.
Hmm.
Bit one-sided this, eh?
Hmm.
Bit one-sided this, eh?
Azul wants to kiss, Matt Leblanc (sp?)
Bingo, Chipseh.
See? A massive majority of people watch it, though not necessarily frequently - like dear Howie.
I very, very, very much doubt this with Neighbours.
See? A massive majority of people watch it, though not necessarily frequently - like dear Howie.
I very, very, very much doubt this with Neighbours.
Azul wrote:
> Fact. Neighbours hasn't been going strong for 10 years in the United
> Kingdom nor the USA
Fact - it has only recently started being shown in the USA.
How do I know this?
3 years ago in school the Neighbours website linked to bother UK and Aussie. Only recently does it link to the states.
Fact - Neighbours is the most popular soap in Australia - therefore, in reletive terms of success, and the amount of time Neighbours has lasted (nearly 20 years) I'd say it is more successful. It will bring in more revenue than Friends in the long run.
> Fact. Neighbours hasn't been going strong for 10 years in the United
> Kingdom nor the USA
Fact - it has only recently started being shown in the USA.
How do I know this?
3 years ago in school the Neighbours website linked to bother UK and Aussie. Only recently does it link to the states.
Fact - Neighbours is the most popular soap in Australia - therefore, in reletive terms of success, and the amount of time Neighbours has lasted (nearly 20 years) I'd say it is more successful. It will bring in more revenue than Friends in the long run.
Friends is funny. I don't watch it week-in, week-out, but it is funny.
ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> I wanted you to prove Neighbours wasn't going strong after 19 years
> in reaction to your earlier comment
It's blindingly clear!
Do you see massive media coverage on television and in the newspapers about it?
Do you buggery!
Rahhhhhhhh.
It isn't going strongly. It just isn't. If you think that Neighbours is going strong, then you are quite clearly deluded.
Take your head out the clouds, sunshine. Ask anyone "In what show are Joey, Monica, Rachel, Ross, Phoebe and Chandler?"
They'll say Friends. I guarantee it.
Ask someone "In which show is Joe Scully?"
They'll look at you blankly.
Normally this is considered an invalid source.
But considering we're talking about mass worldwide popularity, it's so valid.
[URL]http://googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=friends&q2=neighbours&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us[/URL]
> I wanted you to prove Neighbours wasn't going strong after 19 years
> in reaction to your earlier comment
It's blindingly clear!
Do you see massive media coverage on television and in the newspapers about it?
Do you buggery!
Rahhhhhhhh.
It isn't going strongly. It just isn't. If you think that Neighbours is going strong, then you are quite clearly deluded.
Take your head out the clouds, sunshine. Ask anyone "In what show are Joey, Monica, Rachel, Ross, Phoebe and Chandler?"
They'll say Friends. I guarantee it.
Ask someone "In which show is Joe Scully?"
They'll look at you blankly.
Normally this is considered an invalid source.
But considering we're talking about mass worldwide popularity, it's so valid.
[URL]http://googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=friends&q2=neighbours&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us[/URL]
Azul wrote:
> I honestly can't believe you're trying to say Friends hasn't gone
> strongly for 10 years.
What the funk are you talking about? Where did I say Friends wasn't going strong? No-where, I said it was crap, yes; which it is.
I wanted you to prove Neighbours wasn't going strong after 19 years in reaction to your earlier comment about a program going strong for 10 years wouldn't be poorly written, I gave you an example and you failed to prove otherwise.
"How to avoid the facts in idiotic fashion" - Azul.
> I honestly can't believe you're trying to say Friends hasn't gone
> strongly for 10 years.
What the funk are you talking about? Where did I say Friends wasn't going strong? No-where, I said it was crap, yes; which it is.
I wanted you to prove Neighbours wasn't going strong after 19 years in reaction to your earlier comment about a program going strong for 10 years wouldn't be poorly written, I gave you an example and you failed to prove otherwise.
"How to avoid the facts in idiotic fashion" - Azul.
Source for what, moron?
The fact that Friends has lasted 10 years?
The fact that millions upon millions of people view it world wide?
The fact that the worldwide media massively publicise it's mass popularity?
I honestly can't believe you're trying to say Friends hasn't gone strongly for 10 years.
Ah, "mongo Alastair" to quote someone who wishes to remain nameless, you're an idiot.
The fact that Friends has lasted 10 years?
The fact that millions upon millions of people view it world wide?
The fact that the worldwide media massively publicise it's mass popularity?
I honestly can't believe you're trying to say Friends hasn't gone strongly for 10 years.
Ah, "mongo Alastair" to quote someone who wishes to remain nameless, you're an idiot.
Azul wrote:
> You're saying Neighbours has been going strong for 10 years? Do shut
> up.
Prove it, once again you avoid the facts. You stupid little boy.
> Secondly, Friends really isn't poorly written. It really isn't.
> Millions upon millions of other people agree with me.
Yes and millions and millions of people also buy multiple PS2 consoles yearly, what a credable example of how idiotic the general public can be.
Do close your hole.
> You're saying Neighbours has been going strong for 10 years? Do shut
> up.
Prove it, once again you avoid the facts. You stupid little boy.
> Secondly, Friends really isn't poorly written. It really isn't.
> Millions upon millions of other people agree with me.
Yes and millions and millions of people also buy multiple PS2 consoles yearly, what a credable example of how idiotic the general public can be.
Do close your hole.
Azul wrote:
> Hardly a credible source.
Yet seemingly infinitley better than the source you can not find.
> Hardly a credible source.
Yet seemingly infinitley better than the source you can not find.
Page: