The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
List your starting line up and how much you think they are worth.
Spurs
Keller - £2.5 mil
Carr - £10 mil (I believe Newcastle put a bid of this in for him)
Gardner - £7 mil (according to Stuart, I agree :-D)
King - £6 mil
Tarrico - Free (maybe half a mil if they're stupid!)
Both King and Gardner will increase, as they are both young and both have possibilities of England careers ahead of them.
Davies - £15-17 mil (When on form, he's amazing, when he's injured or off form (most of the time) well....ahem)
Brown - £3 mil
Redknapp - Free
Kanoute - £11 mil (at least)
Defoe - £11 mil (as above, at least)
Keane - £15 mil
Yeh, your turn
Spurs
Keller - £2.5 mil
Carr - £10 mil (I believe Newcastle put a bid of this in for him)
Gardner - £7 mil (according to Stuart, I agree :-D)
King - £6 mil
Tarrico - Free (maybe half a mil if they're stupid!)
Both King and Gardner will increase, as they are both young and both have possibilities of England careers ahead of them.
Davies - £15-17 mil (When on form, he's amazing, when he's injured or off form (most of the time) well....ahem)
Brown - £3 mil
Redknapp - Free
Kanoute - £11 mil (at least)
Defoe - £11 mil (as above, at least)
Keane - £15 mil
Yeh, your turn
Page:
To change the subject:
Silvestre is 26, not 23.
Silvestre is 26, not 23.
Colourless wrote:
> I just disagree that Howard is the best keeper in the premiership.
> That's where the "Howard's not even first choice" argument
> came into it.
He isn't the best in the premiership, but he is one of the best.
> I just disagree that Howard is the best keeper in the premiership.
> That's where the "Howard's not even first choice" argument
> came into it.
He isn't the best in the premiership, but he is one of the best.
I'm not a United fan so I don't really care who's better.
Personally from what I've seen, they both look about the same standard, so S'Alex can choose who he likes.
I just disagree that Howard is the best keeper in the premiership. That's where the "Howard's not even first choice" argument came into it.
Personally from what I've seen, they both look about the same standard, so S'Alex can choose who he likes.
I just disagree that Howard is the best keeper in the premiership. That's where the "Howard's not even first choice" argument came into it.
Lil Bro wrote:
> Not entirely, I kinda support Yeovil. don't go, a long way away. But
> yeh I have an idea where you coming from.
Yet you argue that Spurs fans such as yourself are the most loyal in the country. :-p
> Not entirely, I kinda support Yeovil. don't go, a long way away. But
> yeh I have an idea where you coming from.
Yet you argue that Spurs fans such as yourself are the most loyal in the country. :-p
Well seeing as Howard has played probably twice as many games as Carroll has the whole *Well we hadn't lost when Carroll was in goal* argument is quite irrelevant and ridiculous when discussing who is the better keeper (which is Howard by a country mile by the way) :-D
Ashman wrote:
> Colourless wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> Before yesterday's beating by Portsmouth, Man U had never lost with
> Carrrol in goal. That is why he was in.
>
> You just contradicted yourself and handed Game,set and match to Lil
> bro.
>
> Man Utd haven't lost with Carroll, yet they have with Howard.
>
> That would therefore suggest that perhaps Carroll is a better
> keeper....
>
> Carroll is never a better keeper than Tim Howard, I first thought he
> was left out of the Man Utd team as he felt jaded, and had that
> problem (tourettes syndrome i think) before he arrived at Man Utd. I
> like Howard, I think he is easilty one of the three best Premiership
> keepers alongside Cudicini and Niemi.
I totally agree.
> Colourless wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> Before yesterday's beating by Portsmouth, Man U had never lost with
> Carrrol in goal. That is why he was in.
>
> You just contradicted yourself and handed Game,set and match to Lil
> bro.
>
> Man Utd haven't lost with Carroll, yet they have with Howard.
>
> That would therefore suggest that perhaps Carroll is a better
> keeper....
>
> Carroll is never a better keeper than Tim Howard, I first thought he
> was left out of the Man Utd team as he felt jaded, and had that
> problem (tourettes syndrome i think) before he arrived at Man Utd. I
> like Howard, I think he is easilty one of the three best Premiership
> keepers alongside Cudicini and Niemi.
I totally agree.
Colourless wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> Before yesterday's beating by Portsmouth, Man U had never lost with
> Carrrol in goal. That is why he was in.
>
> You just contradicted yourself and handed Game,set and match to Lil
> bro.
>
> Man Utd haven't lost with Carroll, yet they have with Howard.
>
> That would therefore suggest that perhaps Carroll is a better
> keeper....
But Howard has played lots more games than Carroll.
> Wakka wrote:
> Before yesterday's beating by Portsmouth, Man U had never lost with
> Carrrol in goal. That is why he was in.
>
> You just contradicted yourself and handed Game,set and match to Lil
> bro.
>
> Man Utd haven't lost with Carroll, yet they have with Howard.
>
> That would therefore suggest that perhaps Carroll is a better
> keeper....
But Howard has played lots more games than Carroll.
Colourless wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> Before yesterday's beating by Portsmouth, Man U had never lost with
> Carrrol in goal. That is why he was in.
>
> You just contradicted yourself and handed Game,set and match to Lil
> bro.
>
> Man Utd haven't lost with Carroll, yet they have with Howard.
>
> That would therefore suggest that perhaps Carroll is a better
> keeper....
Carroll is never a better keeper than Tim Howard, I first thought he was left out of the Man Utd team as he felt jaded, and had that problem (tourettes syndrome i think) before he arrived at Man Utd. I like Howard, I think he is easilty one of the three best Premiership keepers alongside Cudicini and Niemi.
> Wakka wrote:
> Before yesterday's beating by Portsmouth, Man U had never lost with
> Carrrol in goal. That is why he was in.
>
> You just contradicted yourself and handed Game,set and match to Lil
> bro.
>
> Man Utd haven't lost with Carroll, yet they have with Howard.
>
> That would therefore suggest that perhaps Carroll is a better
> keeper....
Carroll is never a better keeper than Tim Howard, I first thought he was left out of the Man Utd team as he felt jaded, and had that problem (tourettes syndrome i think) before he arrived at Man Utd. I like Howard, I think he is easilty one of the three best Premiership keepers alongside Cudicini and Niemi.
Colourless wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
> Ashman wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
> Oh the hypocrisy.
>
> You just said Carr was worth 10 mil. And Davies was worth 17 mil.
> Ha.
>
> I'd say carr = 6mil
>
> Davies = 8 mil
>
> Keane = 11 mil
I'd have to agree with that personally.
> Lil Bro wrote:
> Ashman wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
> Oh the hypocrisy.
>
> You just said Carr was worth 10 mil. And Davies was worth 17 mil.
> Ha.
>
> I'd say carr = 6mil
>
> Davies = 8 mil
>
> Keane = 11 mil
I'd have to agree with that personally.
Lil Bro wrote:
> Ashman wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
> Carr - £10 mil (I believe Newcastle put a bid of this in for
> him)
>
> You'd be lucky...
>
> Easily. Talking crap mate :-D
Erm, no, Scott Parker went to Chelsea for £7 mil, he's twice the player Carr is. As is Wayne Bridge, who went there for £7 mil also, again, he is better than Carr.
> Ashman wrote:
> Lil Bro wrote:
> Carr - £10 mil (I believe Newcastle put a bid of this in for
> him)
>
> You'd be lucky...
>
> Easily. Talking crap mate :-D
Erm, no, Scott Parker went to Chelsea for £7 mil, he's twice the player Carr is. As is Wayne Bridge, who went there for £7 mil also, again, he is better than Carr.
Page: