Viewing Thread:
"One Random Thread For Things That Are Random But Is This Topic Random Or Does It Have A Meaning?"

One Random Thread For Things That Are Random But Is This Topic Random Or Does It Have A Meaning?

One Random Thread For Things That Are Random But Is This Topic Random Or Does It Have A Meaning?

Hmmm...

Let me think

NOPE

Yes, it does have a meaning. It shows you are a retard.

RoJ wrote:
> Yes, it does have a meaning. It shows you are a retard.

Or does it show your a retard for replying?

No. You asked a question - albeit a stupid, retarded question - but nonetheless a question. Therefore I decided to answer it.

RoJ wrote:
> No. You asked a question - albeit a stupid, retarded question - but
> nonetheless a question. Therefore I decided to answer it.

But if said question is so retarded then why does said question need an answer. Doesn't this prove that said answer is as retarded if not more so retarded then said question. My case has been made.

P4NT$ wrote:
> But if said question is so retarded then why does said question need
> an answer. Doesn't this prove that said answer is as retarded if not
> more so retarded then said question. My case has been made.

Said question is so retarded that said question needs a reply that is not retarded to tell the author of the said question that the said question is retarded, and furthermore the author of the said question is also retarded.
My case has been won.

I think what Roj is trying to say is that old wives saying;

Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.

Exactly, but since I am not an old wife I didn't say it.
I am off for food now.

RoJ wrote:
> P4NT$ wrote:
> But if said question is so retarded then why does said question need
> an answer. Doesn't this prove that said answer is as retarded if
> not
> more so retarded then said question. My case has been made.
>
> Said question is so retarded that said question needs a reply that is
> not retarded to tell the author of the said question that the said
> question is retarded, and furthermore the author of the said question
> is also retarded.
> My case has been won.
My case remains if said question is so retarded, then why does said question need said answer to prove that said question is retarded, this only proves the fact that said question is retarded but it also goes on to prove that said answer is equaly retared if not more so then said question, as the purpose of said answer is to state the obvious that said question is retarded which I think said question proves by it self. Therefore said author of said answer in response to said question is equally as retarded as said answer to said question.
Your case on the event of said question has been lost, and I have won.