The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Read one of those crazy, propagandist, BS muslim websites and I noticed "nothing comes into being on its own."
allah came from where?
allah came from where?
Page:
KR wrote:
> Cyclone wrote:
> which is
> why he's under surveillance....?
>
> He has been directly linked to some of AL Qaida's top men -
> apparantly he has been sending people off to training camps in
> Afghanistan.
>
No, I put the '?' in because it linked into a silent question to you (i.e, why he shouldn't be 'strung up' just yet, you see?) - I stated why he was before that very comment!
> Cyclone wrote:
> which is
> why he's under surveillance....?
>
> He has been directly linked to some of AL Qaida's top men -
> apparantly he has been sending people off to training camps in
> Afghanistan.
>
No, I put the '?' in because it linked into a silent question to you (i.e, why he shouldn't be 'strung up' just yet, you see?) - I stated why he was before that very comment!
1) Where do you get such sensitive information, just out of interest?
2) I said he's under surveillance because he could in probability incite some 'treasonous' crime, but he hasn't.
3) You say £500,000 is a lot to spend on one person, but do you get angry about company leaders, sports people, Royalty etc getting this amount of money, when you say you don't care too much? I know it's a different ball game, but in your wording your concern was it being about 'one person'.
2) I said he's under surveillance because he could in probability incite some 'treasonous' crime, but he hasn't.
3) You say £500,000 is a lot to spend on one person, but do you get angry about company leaders, sports people, Royalty etc getting this amount of money, when you say you don't care too much? I know it's a different ball game, but in your wording your concern was it being about 'one person'.
Cyclone wrote:
> which is
> why he's under surveillance....?
He has been directly linked to some of AL Qaida's top men - apparantly he has been sending people off to training camps in Afghanistan.
>So why do you care about that measly £500,000?
Because it is being spent on one person - it would just be easier to lock him up or ship him out.
> which is
> why he's under surveillance....?
He has been directly linked to some of AL Qaida's top men - apparantly he has been sending people off to training camps in Afghanistan.
>So why do you care about that measly £500,000?
Because it is being spent on one person - it would just be easier to lock him up or ship him out.
KR wrote:
> Preaching every friday to young muslims about how evil this country is
> and how much westeners deserve to die etc I would call that treason.
Fair enough, he's been exercising his right of free speech, albeit in a very stupid and ignorant way. That's hardly a 'hangable' offence, unless he directly incites a crime that is 'treasonous' - which is why he's under surveillance....?
>
> Also to modify the SA80 it cost an extra £82,000,000 so
> obviously im not too much concerned about tax payers money because at
> the minute I don't pay tax.
So why do you care about that measly £500,000?
> Preaching every friday to young muslims about how evil this country is
> and how much westeners deserve to die etc I would call that treason.
Fair enough, he's been exercising his right of free speech, albeit in a very stupid and ignorant way. That's hardly a 'hangable' offence, unless he directly incites a crime that is 'treasonous' - which is why he's under surveillance....?
>
> Also to modify the SA80 it cost an extra £82,000,000 so
> obviously im not too much concerned about tax payers money because at
> the minute I don't pay tax.
So why do you care about that measly £500,000?
Preaching every friday to young muslims about how evil this country is and how much westeners deserve to die etc I would call that treason.
Also to modify the SA80 it cost an extra £82,000,000 so obviously im not too much concerned about tax payers money because at the minute I don't pay tax.
Also to modify the SA80 it cost an extra £82,000,000 so obviously im not too much concerned about tax payers money because at the minute I don't pay tax.
Not saying he has or hasn't, but please tell me his act of treason to this country.
Why are you concerned about that taxpayers money when there are far greater wastages AND (not wastages = expenditures) expenditures in action - eg, 8 chinook helicopters, cost of design order + correction of errors, about £400,000,000?
Why are you concerned about that taxpayers money when there are far greater wastages AND (not wastages = expenditures) expenditures in action - eg, 8 chinook helicopters, cost of design order + correction of errors, about £400,000,000?
Cyclone wrote:
> But wait! That money is protecting YOU! So how can you complain? Odd
> paradox of view and comment there.....
Yes but taxpayers money that could be spent on more benficial things instead of on an Evil person who deserves to be hung for treason.
> But wait! That money is protecting YOU! So how can you complain? Odd
> paradox of view and comment there.....
Yes but taxpayers money that could be spent on more benficial things instead of on an Evil person who deserves to be hung for treason.
Ah...
KR wrote:
> Im surprised that he is still alive the amount of crazy people in the
> country that haven't tried to kill him yet - But MI5 have him inder
> surveillance 24 hours per day with costs £500,000 per year.
But wait! That money is protecting YOU! So how can you complain? Odd paradox of view and comment there.....
> Im surprised that he is still alive the amount of crazy people in the
> country that haven't tried to kill him yet - But MI5 have him inder
> surveillance 24 hours per day with costs £500,000 per year.
But wait! That money is protecting YOU! So how can you complain? Odd paradox of view and comment there.....
KR wrote:
> If Britain tries any thing now it's called Being racist even though we
> take in more asylum seekers then most countries.
What, like say we should ignore desperate people and just chuck them around in a big game of human tennis around Europe? Like what you seem to be thinking?
> If Britain tries any thing now it's called Being racist even though we
> take in more asylum seekers then most countries.
What, like say we should ignore desperate people and just chuck them around in a big game of human tennis around Europe? Like what you seem to be thinking?
Page: