The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If a foetus has a serious genetic defect (its life will be comprised of sitting in a chair and drooling) do you think a compulsory abortion should take place?
Page:
Now back to the topic.
Hedfix wrote:
> Better still: do you eat eggs?
Yes.
> Better still: do you eat eggs?
Yes.
Edgy wrote:
> Do you eat meat Forest Fan?
Yes.
> Do you eat meat Forest Fan?
Yes.
Hoho :D
Better still: do you eat eggs?
Do you eat meat Forest Fan?
Hedfix wrote:
> Miscarriages happen in nature, I don't see abortion as very different
> from that.
Natural deaths occur through lighting, similarly to miscarriage, this is natural death, abortion is murder and is comparable to being killed.
> Miscarriages happen in nature, I don't see abortion as very different
> from that.
Natural deaths occur through lighting, similarly to miscarriage, this is natural death, abortion is murder and is comparable to being killed.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Murder should never be an option.
That's funny because the world's built on it and sanctions it every hour of every day.
> Murder should never be an option.
That's funny because the world's built on it and sanctions it every hour of every day.
Miscarriages happen in nature, I don't see abortion as very different from that.
Edgy wrote:
> A foetus isn't an independant living organism until it is born and
> breathing for itself.
>
> At the foetus state it is only alive because you are.
>
> It is not a baby until it has been born.
It is alive, it just changes enviornments.
>
> So if you mean, should a healthy baby be killed? The answer is no.
They are being killed currently though.
>
> However, in the early stages of pregnancy, if the circumstances mean
> the kid wouldn't live a decent life for various reasons, then I
> believe it should be the choice of the parents to be.
Murder should never be an option.
>
> Example: Should a rape victim be forced to bring up the child that
> was a result of the most traumatic experience of her life?
I actually said I would consider that, even though MURDER I do not believe is the answer, I would think about possibly, possibly legalising it, but I still don't agree with ANY abortion, except if the mother or baby will die.
> A foetus isn't an independant living organism until it is born and
> breathing for itself.
>
> At the foetus state it is only alive because you are.
>
> It is not a baby until it has been born.
It is alive, it just changes enviornments.
>
> So if you mean, should a healthy baby be killed? The answer is no.
They are being killed currently though.
>
> However, in the early stages of pregnancy, if the circumstances mean
> the kid wouldn't live a decent life for various reasons, then I
> believe it should be the choice of the parents to be.
Murder should never be an option.
>
> Example: Should a rape victim be forced to bring up the child that
> was a result of the most traumatic experience of her life?
I actually said I would consider that, even though MURDER I do not believe is the answer, I would think about possibly, possibly legalising it, but I still don't agree with ANY abortion, except if the mother or baby will die.
Page: