The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://snopes.com/politics/business/mondex.asp[/URL]
Page:
[URL]http://snopes.com/politics/business/mondex.asp[/URL]
That's it Pandaemonium.
Forest Fan wrote:
> That's it Pandaemonium.
Yep, your entire theory ridiculed. A bit of a pointless thread, but anyway.........
> That's it Pandaemonium.
Yep, your entire theory ridiculed. A bit of a pointless thread, but anyway.........
Didn't ridicule the theory, just showed me some more pictures of the Mark of the Beast.
Did you read it? Because if you read it, it utterly debunks your madcap 'psycho gunman on a belltower roof' theory.
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Did you read it? Because if you read it, it utterly debunks your
> madcap 'psycho gunman on a belltower roof' theory.
Not really, didn't debunk it one bit.
> Did you read it? Because if you read it, it utterly debunks your
> madcap 'psycho gunman on a belltower roof' theory.
Not really, didn't debunk it one bit.
Nice hoax :-)
Forest Fan wrote:
> Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Did you read it? Because if you read it, it utterly debunks your
> madcap 'psycho gunman on a belltower roof' theory.
>
> Not really, didn't debunk it one bit.
Haha.
It debunked all over you.
I can see the stains from here.
> Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Did you read it? Because if you read it, it utterly debunks your
> madcap 'psycho gunman on a belltower roof' theory.
>
> Not really, didn't debunk it one bit.
Haha.
It debunked all over you.
I can see the stains from here.
That website really did not disprove the Mark of the Beast, in fact it just was further proof!
Serious debunkage.
Page: