The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Please stick with me here, and excuse any tyop's, I'm struggling to see the keyboard after accidently catching a glimpse of Mel Gibson's "The Passion of Christ".
Whilst I haven't seen the whole film, the small segment I did see was like having Mel Gibson ram a crucifix into my eye repeatedly. But only if it was attached to his groin, and he was thrusting wildly.
To me it is now apparent that this movie is bad, bad, bad. Once more Hollywood have taken a sdtory, and twisted it to suit it's own means. First off, it's anti-semitic. The way that Jews are apparently shown in this movie is wrong, and I can be absolutely 100 percent sure of that, because I was there when it really happened. What's more, the movie is anti-Roman. I think the people of Italy should burn down the Vatican after this, because the way that their ancestors are shown is terrible.
What's more, Christ himself is being exploited in this movie. I'm sure that God didn't send his only son back to Earth to not only be constantly remind of wat happened to him by people wearing crucifixes, but to suffer the same fate time and again in the countless takes they took to produce these scenes.
However, it is Mel Gibson that I am most sickened with. After his accurate telling of Scottish history in the movie 'Braveheart' I would have thought that he would have got his fatcs right here. Because what is in the Bible is FACT, and not the Federation Against Copyright Theft, but trueness. Mel Gibson should have stuck to what he read and we know is true, rather than putting his own gory ideal on the situation. Jesus would not bleed like that, unless he was producing wine ot get under-age girls drunk - this we know, why leave it out?
It is highly likely that anyone that watches this movie will burn in Hell for eternity, and as such I'd advise caution before going to see it.
Whilst I haven't seen the whole film, the small segment I did see was like having Mel Gibson ram a crucifix into my eye repeatedly. But only if it was attached to his groin, and he was thrusting wildly.
To me it is now apparent that this movie is bad, bad, bad. Once more Hollywood have taken a sdtory, and twisted it to suit it's own means. First off, it's anti-semitic. The way that Jews are apparently shown in this movie is wrong, and I can be absolutely 100 percent sure of that, because I was there when it really happened. What's more, the movie is anti-Roman. I think the people of Italy should burn down the Vatican after this, because the way that their ancestors are shown is terrible.
What's more, Christ himself is being exploited in this movie. I'm sure that God didn't send his only son back to Earth to not only be constantly remind of wat happened to him by people wearing crucifixes, but to suffer the same fate time and again in the countless takes they took to produce these scenes.
However, it is Mel Gibson that I am most sickened with. After his accurate telling of Scottish history in the movie 'Braveheart' I would have thought that he would have got his fatcs right here. Because what is in the Bible is FACT, and not the Federation Against Copyright Theft, but trueness. Mel Gibson should have stuck to what he read and we know is true, rather than putting his own gory ideal on the situation. Jesus would not bleed like that, unless he was producing wine ot get under-age girls drunk - this we know, why leave it out?
It is highly likely that anyone that watches this movie will burn in Hell for eternity, and as such I'd advise caution before going to see it.
Page:
People made a fuss about Dogma when that came out and I see this whole thing as the same situation, although I assume The Passion' doesn't have a "giant rubber poo monster" in it.
i sawa trailetl orn tiv argh atioa can;t siee tioch
Ah, a throwback to the good old SR.
(On another note, some others of you are utter fools.)
(On another note, some others of you are utter fools.)
*giggles*
Anyone familiar with sarcasm here?
Meka Dragon wrote:
> Because what is in the Bible is FACT, and not the Federation Against
> Copyright Theft, but trueness. Mel Gibson should have stuck to what
> he read and we know is true,
Sorry but i am inclined to disagree here. But thats because i am an atheist, and find all my answers in physics....
> Because what is in the Bible is FACT, and not the Federation Against
> Copyright Theft, but trueness. Mel Gibson should have stuck to what
> he read and we know is true,
Sorry but i am inclined to disagree here. But thats because i am an atheist, and find all my answers in physics....
The Bible is not proven to be all fact though it is fact that Jesus lived the Bible is merely second hand evidence.
From an atheist view, a hefty proportion of the world doesn't, in fact, think what is in the Bible is fact. Just saying.
Nooo Mystique
Heh
Page: