The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I take it votes that have been edited don't count in the final totals.
Would stop all the monkeys voting and then changing their votes towards the end just to suit who is in the running.
Would stop all the monkeys voting and then changing their votes towards the end just to suit who is in the running.
Page:
Who shall I vote, hmmm.... not FFF.
Yes because Snuggly suggested it last time, but now he's leaving.
Face it: A secret ballot is more representative of the forums.
I hate this 'landslide' stuff, it's just cheap.
Face it: A secret ballot is more representative of the forums.
I hate this 'landslide' stuff, it's just cheap.
Hedfix wrote:
> Let's all vote and then edit the vote out so we get a secret ballot.
>
> The staffies can still read who we voted for so they can still total
> it up.
You're really going for this secret ballot thing arentcha!
> Let's all vote and then edit the vote out so we get a secret ballot.
>
> The staffies can still read who we voted for so they can still total
> it up.
You're really going for this secret ballot thing arentcha!
The sagacious one wrote:
> I concur. People should have their eyes closed when they type the
> name of the person they want as a new notable. That way full
> confidentiality is achieved.
I vite fpr ghasncva.';;a
> I concur. People should have their eyes closed when they type the
> name of the person they want as a new notable. That way full
> confidentiality is achieved.
I vite fpr ghasncva.';;a
I vote for Sheepy
Eh
Eh
Let's all vote and then edit the vote out so we get a secret ballot.
The staffies can still read who we voted for so they can still total it up.
The staffies can still read who we voted for so they can still total it up.
Rosalind wrote:
> Seems to me its the perfect excuse to overhaul the system and allow us
> to have an unseen way to vote.
I concur. People should have their eyes closed when they type the name of the person they want as a new notable. That way full confidentiality is achieved.
> Seems to me its the perfect excuse to overhaul the system and allow us
> to have an unseen way to vote.
I concur. People should have their eyes closed when they type the name of the person they want as a new notable. That way full confidentiality is achieved.
Staffies can see the original posts though, can't they? Unless they're messy and all over the place.
Other than that, I agree with Borat, take it away for a day.
Other than that, I agree with Borat, take it away for a day.
Yeah, but then again that would be the kind of thing that requires effort, and I'm leaving tomorrow. Maybe when my reign of terror is over, someone will get round to organising a proper system.
Seems to me its the perfect excuse to overhaul the system and allow us to have an unseen way to vote.
Page: