The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The Creative GAD Winners ListWhether it's a story, a review, walkthrough or an interesting article, Creative GAD Wins will now be listed in the hope of encouraging more.----
CURRENT WINNERS TO 15TH MARCH
----
Aliboy: W W W R C W
Black Glove: S
Borat: A
Chippxero: R W R R R T W W
cjh: T T T R T T T T
Dringo: A
FantasyMeister: F
Ghost Killer: R R R
Grandprix: A A
Grix Thraves: A
Hannard: R
Hedfix: A
Ineedsleep: S
JFH: R
Meka Dragon: W
:. nitro_goat .:: T
Nickgreen: W
pb: S S A A
Reefer: R R R R R
Seraphim: U U
Sibelius: S
Silent Thunder R
Sinnocent: S
Smedlos: R U
Spoonbeast A
Sunflower: S
[S]
W - Walkthrough
A - Article
F - Funny
R - Review
T - Technical
S - Story
U - Unique
C - Challenge
[/S] Page:
I think pb knows he's won as he now draws with him on the top GAD winners list, am I right pb?
If you check how many GADs you've won and if it's gone up then you'll win in a few days, apparently.
If you check how many GADs you've won and if it's gone up then you'll win in a few days, apparently.
pb wrote:
> Well, looks like Aliboy's won again (well, for tomorrow anyway).
> That'll either be cheats or Walkthoughs.
>
> I reckon that they should only allow you to win for cheats or
> walkthoughs if you take an active part in the forums too. But I
> guess they're just happy that they're getting a cheat database
> updated to try and rival the other sites.
what makes you think that? Theres nothing to suggest that he has entered cheats or a walkthrough (although that said a common trend i find is that walkthroughs win and then appear on the list).
> Well, looks like Aliboy's won again (well, for tomorrow anyway).
> That'll either be cheats or Walkthoughs.
>
> I reckon that they should only allow you to win for cheats or
> walkthoughs if you take an active part in the forums too. But I
> guess they're just happy that they're getting a cheat database
> updated to try and rival the other sites.
what makes you think that? Theres nothing to suggest that he has entered cheats or a walkthrough (although that said a common trend i find is that walkthroughs win and then appear on the list).
It's not them winning for cheats that bothers me, I've done it myself. It's just that you see so many usernames winning that don't come on the forums and it's a shame for the forums, really.
Blimey didn't expect that from you pb, usually something Kawada complains about ;)
I don't mind as long as it's not the same people winning every week ^^, this week there should be quite a few chat post wins. Last week there were atleast 5+ reviews posted and lots of other worthy threads. So good luck everyone.
P.S Just reminding everyone, Monday and Tuesday are webmaster days. God knows why so many of these webmaster don't bother to claim it. What a waste :(
I don't mind as long as it's not the same people winning every week ^^, this week there should be quite a few chat post wins. Last week there were atleast 5+ reviews posted and lots of other worthy threads. So good luck everyone.
P.S Just reminding everyone, Monday and Tuesday are webmaster days. God knows why so many of these webmaster don't bother to claim it. What a waste :(
I hope it's a walkthrough.
Well, looks like Aliboy's won again (well, for tomorrow anyway). That'll either be cheats or Walkthoughs.
I reckon that they should only allow you to win for cheats or walkthoughs if you take an active part in the forums too. But I guess they're just happy that they're getting a cheat database updated to try and rival the other sites.
I reckon that they should only allow you to win for cheats or walkthoughs if you take an active part in the forums too. But I guess they're just happy that they're getting a cheat database updated to try and rival the other sites.
Der Nazi wrote:
> Sending in the same batch of cheats twice? That must go down as
> the worst possible way to cheat, as it takes no cunning
> whatsoever, and is so glaringly obvious!
>
> And as far as I know, they all get checked before being posted
> on the site, though thery don't tend to typographical mistakes
> I've made in the past! :)
In nickgreens cases three times. I don't think anyone won with extraction point cheats before.
Incidently an insider tip when it comes to cheats. If you send in the same ones as your rivals typically it neutralises their attempt at winning with that submission and vice versa. Although sometimes i suspect theres more dirty dealing involved at freeola or somewhere along the line.
> Sending in the same batch of cheats twice? That must go down as
> the worst possible way to cheat, as it takes no cunning
> whatsoever, and is so glaringly obvious!
>
> And as far as I know, they all get checked before being posted
> on the site, though thery don't tend to typographical mistakes
> I've made in the past! :)
In nickgreens cases three times. I don't think anyone won with extraction point cheats before.
Incidently an insider tip when it comes to cheats. If you send in the same ones as your rivals typically it neutralises their attempt at winning with that submission and vice versa. Although sometimes i suspect theres more dirty dealing involved at freeola or somewhere along the line.
Sending in the same batch of cheats twice? That must go down as the worst possible way to cheat, as it takes no cunning whatsoever, and is so glaringly obvious!
And as far as I know, they all get checked before being posted on the site, though thery don't tend to typographical mistakes I've made in the past! :)
And as far as I know, they all get checked before being posted on the site, though thery don't tend to typographical mistakes I've made in the past! :)
spoonbeast wrote:
> Incidently, what was the response when he asked that question?
I responded with:
Sunflower wrote:
> NickGreen wrote:
> send some cheats which have already been sent in, can you still
> win?
> No, as they do not get submitted. (They get checked before
> published)
Well that's what I thought... *Rolls eyes*
> Incidently, what was the response when he asked that question?
I responded with:
Sunflower wrote:
> NickGreen wrote:
> send some cheats which have already been sent in, can you still
> win?
> No, as they do not get submitted. (They get checked before
> published)
Well that's what I thought... *Rolls eyes*
Sunflower wrote:
> spoonbeast wrote:
> I'm a bit dubious as to awarding sundays winning entry. Seems
> to
> be a repeat cheat entry. We've already got those cheats.
>
> I haven't checked, but it wouldn't surprise me with NickGreen,
> especially after this:
> NickGreen wrote:
> And if you send some cheats which have already been sent in,
> can
> you still win?
>
> He was sooo desperate to win, he'd do anything.
>
> Do you think he knows he won? That'd be so funny if he
> didn't... *Laughs*
Incidently, what was the response when he asked that question?
> spoonbeast wrote:
> I'm a bit dubious as to awarding sundays winning entry. Seems
> to
> be a repeat cheat entry. We've already got those cheats.
>
> I haven't checked, but it wouldn't surprise me with NickGreen,
> especially after this:
> NickGreen wrote:
> And if you send some cheats which have already been sent in,
> can
> you still win?
>
> He was sooo desperate to win, he'd do anything.
>
> Do you think he knows he won? That'd be so funny if he
> didn't... *Laughs*
Incidently, what was the response when he asked that question?
Page: