The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The Creative GAD Winners ListWhether it's a story, a review, walkthrough or an interesting article, Creative GAD Wins will now be listed in the hope of encouraging more.----
CURRENT WINNERS TO 15TH MARCH
----
Aliboy: W W W R C W
Black Glove: S
Borat: A
Chippxero: R W R R R T W W
cjh: T T T R T T T T
Dringo: A
FantasyMeister: F
Ghost Killer: R R R
Grandprix: A A
Grix Thraves: A
Hannard: R
Hedfix: A
Ineedsleep: S
JFH: R
Meka Dragon: W
:. nitro_goat .:: T
Nickgreen: W
pb: S S A A
Reefer: R R R R R
Seraphim: U U
Sibelius: S
Silent Thunder R
Sinnocent: S
Smedlos: R U
Spoonbeast A
Sunflower: S
[S]
W - Walkthrough
A - Article
F - Funny
R - Review
T - Technical
S - Story
U - Unique
C - Challenge
[/S] Page:
*fizzy pop*
(I'm going to keep this going, even if no-one else does!)
Well done to Smiler1 for winning the last ever Bingo, and to Machie for winning the new category of Top poster (for contribution within the forums).
(I'm going to keep this going, even if no-one else does!)
Well done to Smiler1 for winning the last ever Bingo, and to Machie for winning the new category of Top poster (for contribution within the forums).
*pop*
Well done Reefer. Good review.
Well done Reefer. Good review.
Vexxxed wrote:
> Killer Nightmare wrote:
> How hard is it nowadays to win for walkthroughs, I used to win
> them years ago when the site still sold games etc.
>
> If you actually make one yourself that is not copied from a
> walkthrough site, your chances are pretty good, as all of the
> current ones submitted are copies.
Yeh i remember i used to actually make em myself and win...but now i hardly have any time :( Haven't written on in years, but a 30 pound voucher does sound pretty good.
> Killer Nightmare wrote:
> How hard is it nowadays to win for walkthroughs, I used to win
> them years ago when the site still sold games etc.
>
> If you actually make one yourself that is not copied from a
> walkthrough site, your chances are pretty good, as all of the
> current ones submitted are copies.
Yeh i remember i used to actually make em myself and win...but now i hardly have any time :( Haven't written on in years, but a 30 pound voucher does sound pretty good.
Killer Nightmare wrote:
> How hard is it nowadays to win for walkthroughs, I used to win
> them years ago when the site still sold games etc.
If you actually make one yourself that is not copied from a walkthrough site, your chances are pretty good, as all of the current ones submitted are copies.
> How hard is it nowadays to win for walkthroughs, I used to win
> them years ago when the site still sold games etc.
If you actually make one yourself that is not copied from a walkthrough site, your chances are pretty good, as all of the current ones submitted are copies.
Probably not that hard if you create something original, as there aren't that many other people doing them.
How hard is it nowadays to win for walkthroughs, I used to win them years ago when the site still sold games etc.
Well done to Nitro Goat for the Creative Story win. Hopefully it might encourage one or two people to actually go in there and read the other new stories as well.
I said GO TO CREATIVE AND READ THE GREAT NEW STORIES! *ahem*
I said GO TO CREATIVE AND READ THE GREAT NEW STORIES! *ahem*
No, Staffies are banned from winning as usual. I wouldn't like to award myself or another staffie a prize, unless it's for Bingo!
Vexxxed wrote:
> OK, maybe the word random was not best used there, it won't be a
> random choice from the top 50 posters or whatever, it will be
> based on activity and contribution within the forums.
Yeah random is a pretty poor choice of word for something thats not actually random. :) Glad to hear it isnt random anyway.
> OK, maybe the word random was not best used there, it won't be a
> random choice from the top 50 posters or whatever, it will be
> based on activity and contribution within the forums.
Yeah random is a pretty poor choice of word for something thats not actually random. :) Glad to hear it isnt random anyway.
Vexxxed wrote:
> Garin wrote:
> Even so, random winners? What a waste of a GAD award.
>
> OK, maybe the word random was not best used there, it won't be a
> random choice from the top 50 posters or whatever, it will be
> based on activity and contribution within the forums.
Interesting. So if Garin were to be very helpful and friendly to other users, he might win himself a GAD? It's like my suggestion ages ago. Instead of notables you award good posters with a GAD. Perfect!
Can staffies win too if they've been exceptionally helpful? Im not sure about the others but I'll make more of an effort from now on. =)
> Garin wrote:
> Even so, random winners? What a waste of a GAD award.
>
> OK, maybe the word random was not best used there, it won't be a
> random choice from the top 50 posters or whatever, it will be
> based on activity and contribution within the forums.
Interesting. So if Garin were to be very helpful and friendly to other users, he might win himself a GAD? It's like my suggestion ages ago. Instead of notables you award good posters with a GAD. Perfect!
Can staffies win too if they've been exceptionally helpful? Im not sure about the others but I'll make more of an effort from now on. =)
Page: