The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Official site [URL]http://www.michaelmoorehatesamerica.com/index.html[/URL]
Page:
Yeah...so lets pop it again so we can all continue to point and laugh at him like a bunch of junior school kids.
Now I see why this is called the "Intelligent Discussion" forum...
*end sarcasm mode*
Now I see why this is called the "Intelligent Discussion" forum...
*end sarcasm mode*
*pop*
Not much to add really, except...has anyone noticed how Bell runs and hides until the threads where he receives his worst assrapings are no longer on the main page? Funny that...
Not much to add really, except...has anyone noticed how Bell runs and hides until the threads where he receives his worst assrapings are no longer on the main page? Funny that...
Strafio wrote:
> What he's saying is that you criticise without having seen it.
>
> Also, seeing as this "Mike hate Uncle Sam" doc is based
> around it, you won't know what it's referring to.
> You should watch it, even if it's just to see how stupidly erm...
> "Micheal Moore"-ish it is.
>
> Atleast then you'd have something proper to criticise about it and
> your arguments might be taken a little bit more seriously.
Oh I know, which is why the I'm looking around for the DVD at the cheapest price, so far the lowest I have found is 7.99 which seems okay. Now if the stupid Royal Mail can finally deliver my new debit card... though I'm ordering it with West Wing Season 3 (the whole season for 41.99? Bargain!) which isn't out to 29th March, unless Amazon send it before then. Which is doubtful.
> What he's saying is that you criticise without having seen it.
>
> Also, seeing as this "Mike hate Uncle Sam" doc is based
> around it, you won't know what it's referring to.
> You should watch it, even if it's just to see how stupidly erm...
> "Micheal Moore"-ish it is.
>
> Atleast then you'd have something proper to criticise about it and
> your arguments might be taken a little bit more seriously.
Oh I know, which is why the I'm looking around for the DVD at the cheapest price, so far the lowest I have found is 7.99 which seems okay. Now if the stupid Royal Mail can finally deliver my new debit card... though I'm ordering it with West Wing Season 3 (the whole season for 41.99? Bargain!) which isn't out to 29th March, unless Amazon send it before then. Which is doubtful.
Belldandy wrote:
>
> Well retard where the hell do I say I HAVE SEEN IT? OH DEAR I
> HAVEN'T.
>
Which means that everything you say about Moore can be ridiculed. And it is.
>
> As opposed to you who jump on the bandwagon with Light?
Meheheheheheehehe! Still assuming that anyone who displays a contempt and dislike for you is somehow sucking up to either Goaty or I? Course they are; after all, why would anyone want to poke fun and such a fine and respectible figure such as yourself?
Bell, the only bandwagon here is the one you created. If you wanna get upset that people treat you with contempt, then maybe you should stop acting contemptibly?
>
> Well retard where the hell do I say I HAVE SEEN IT? OH DEAR I
> HAVEN'T.
>
Which means that everything you say about Moore can be ridiculed. And it is.
>
> As opposed to you who jump on the bandwagon with Light?
Meheheheheheehehe! Still assuming that anyone who displays a contempt and dislike for you is somehow sucking up to either Goaty or I? Course they are; after all, why would anyone want to poke fun and such a fine and respectible figure such as yourself?
Bell, the only bandwagon here is the one you created. If you wanna get upset that people treat you with contempt, then maybe you should stop acting contemptibly?
What he's saying is that you criticise without having seen it.
Also, seeing as this "Mike hate Uncle Sam" doc is based around it, you won't know what it's referring to.
You should watch it, even if it's just to see how stupidly erm... "Micheal Moore"-ish it is.
Atleast then you'd have something proper to criticise about it and your arguments might be taken a little bit more seriously.
Also, seeing as this "Mike hate Uncle Sam" doc is based around it, you won't know what it's referring to.
You should watch it, even if it's just to see how stupidly erm... "Micheal Moore"-ish it is.
Atleast then you'd have something proper to criticise about it and your arguments might be taken a little bit more seriously.
Hedfix wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> Well was "Bowling for Columbine" solely about Columbine or
> about bowling?
>
> I doubt it...
>
> So the REAL ppint here is YOU HAVEN'T SEEN IT.
Well retard where the hell do I say I HAVE SEEN IT? OH DEAR I HAVEN'T.
> So any reference this film makes to Moore's film could be used
> completely out of context and you wouldn't actually know.
>
> But then that suits how you do things doesn't it Mr Dandy? You only
> look at the things the re-inforce how you think things are, and not
> how they ACTUALLY are.
As opposed to you who jump on the bandwagon with Light?
What [I]do[/]you do?
> Belldandy wrote:
> Well was "Bowling for Columbine" solely about Columbine or
> about bowling?
>
> I doubt it...
>
> So the REAL ppint here is YOU HAVEN'T SEEN IT.
Well retard where the hell do I say I HAVE SEEN IT? OH DEAR I HAVEN'T.
> So any reference this film makes to Moore's film could be used
> completely out of context and you wouldn't actually know.
>
> But then that suits how you do things doesn't it Mr Dandy? You only
> look at the things the re-inforce how you think things are, and not
> how they ACTUALLY are.
As opposed to you who jump on the bandwagon with Light?
What [I]do[/]you do?
Ranma wrote:
> I'm pretty sure he use to have a late night show that was
> shown on Channel 4 some years ago. Anyone remember that?
Yeah it was called The Awful Truth and before that BBC2 used to show TV Nation also by Moore.
> I'm pretty sure he use to have a late night show that was
> shown on Channel 4 some years ago. Anyone remember that?
Yeah it was called The Awful Truth and before that BBC2 used to show TV Nation also by Moore.
I would recommend watching "Bowling for Columbine" to anyone, I'm pretty sure he use to have a late night show that was shown on Channel 4 some years ago. Anyone remember that?
Goatboy wrote:
> Y'all should treat this thread with the respect it/he deserves
Heh. I agree, but there's something sadistically satisfying of robbing Bell of even the lamest arguments he possesses in his arsenel of half-understood slogans.
> Y'all should treat this thread with the respect it/he deserves
Heh. I agree, but there's something sadistically satisfying of robbing Bell of even the lamest arguments he possesses in his arsenel of half-understood slogans.
Goatboy wrote:
> Oh man, we've already established Bell's credentials with Michael
> Moore's material.
Yeah, fully agree. It's just quite possibly one of the lamest ways I've seen to try and shift attention from the point(s) in question. And I've seen some lame attempts.
> Oh man, we've already established Bell's credentials with Michael
> Moore's material.
Yeah, fully agree. It's just quite possibly one of the lamest ways I've seen to try and shift attention from the point(s) in question. And I've seen some lame attempts.
Page: