Viewing Thread:
"I Like Nirvana but..."

The one time I want to use the blasted link thing and "your link is too long"

pfft, faggots.

Go to....
cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? -Space- ViewItem&item=2510011598&category=43652

£600 for a ONE TRACK CD, flippin 'eck!

You're all talking pisch, and Nirvana suck big gay donkey balls. End of discussion.

Azul = 11/10.

Your reply was straight to the point, but lacked the any real substance. 6/10.

Overrated, but good.

You seem to agree, to an extent.

5/10.

Massivley overrated. Not a bad band by definition but they don't feature on my 800 item playlist (and KISS do so that's saying something) and never will. I've refrained from calling them rubbish because I hope to avoid getting 2/10.

Blank, you get 2/10 as well.

Exploded out of proportion, but still an excellent band.

He's right, they were rubbish. Teen Spirit was quite catchy, the rest was just overdistortioned bum notes, one after the other.

Maverick, I give you 2/10.

True, he might have sounded slightly less pleasant than any pop star today, but the way Nirvana changed music is pretty huge.

Although the Pixies, Pumpkins, Pearl Jam and Soundgarden are better in my opinion.

He always sounded like he had a sore throat to me.

They were rubbish. The guy's voice was awful.

Maverick42 wrote:
> Sorry, but incoherent, screamed vocals over instrumental noise doesn't
> do it for me. It also happens to be incredibly depressing.

Are you sure you're talking about the same Nirvana? I mean, yeah they were depressing and boring to me but incoherent screamed vocals isn't what pops into my head when I think Nirvana.