The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Every Saturday , I go to privata classes at 2:00 O'clock , and then return home at aout 5:30 , and today when I got back I noticed something strange when I turned on my pc , the recycle bin was full , and I am absolutely sure that I never leave any files in the recycle bin , I always empty it after deleting any files , so I opened it , and I found porn , so I knew that my brother was watching porn while I was away , offcourse I won't tell my parents , and I don't know what to do , should I talk to him or what ?? Can anyone help me please ?
Page:
homosh wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> homosh wrote:
> ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> "sex is wrong"
>
> If your parents thought that you wouldn't be alive.
> Correction : Sex outside wedlock is wrong
>
> Well, partially ignore my post then.
>
> But still - what's wrong with enjoying yourself?
> Play games .... eat chocolate .... watch films ... have sex.
> So my parents will tell me off when they see me eat chocolate ?
*Sigh*
What I meant was - sex is enjoyable, so is eating chocolate,
Why is one seen as bad and not the other?
Because people are naked?
Because what?
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> homosh wrote:
> ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> "sex is wrong"
>
> If your parents thought that you wouldn't be alive.
> Correction : Sex outside wedlock is wrong
>
> Well, partially ignore my post then.
>
> But still - what's wrong with enjoying yourself?
> Play games .... eat chocolate .... watch films ... have sex.
> So my parents will tell me off when they see me eat chocolate ?
*Sigh*
What I meant was - sex is enjoyable, so is eating chocolate,
Why is one seen as bad and not the other?
Because people are naked?
Because what?
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> HálloHowArtThou wrote:
> This srgument is doing nothing but going around in circles. And it
> will keep doing so.
>
> It's been raging in the 'being a christian' thread for ages already
> HHAT. I'm not trying to win an arguement here, I just object to
> people saying my parents are failures just because I don't believe in
> god.
If this really annoys you , then I'm sorry
> HálloHowArtThou wrote:
> This srgument is doing nothing but going around in circles. And it
> will keep doing so.
>
> It's been raging in the 'being a christian' thread for ages already
> HHAT. I'm not trying to win an arguement here, I just object to
> people saying my parents are failures just because I don't believe in
> god.
If this really annoys you , then I'm sorry
Lindgren wrote:
> I have the advantage here of seeing both cultures though...I was
> raised by a catholic grandmother but my brothers/cousins/aunts/uncles
> etc are all Muslims. I have seen both side, so i can understand
> somewhat where homosh is coming from, what i do not like is his utter
> insistence that being non-religious defines you as having a failed
> upbringing. Religion cannot be held entirely accountable for a view
> like that.
Yes , not entirely , but it still counts
> I have the advantage here of seeing both cultures though...I was
> raised by a catholic grandmother but my brothers/cousins/aunts/uncles
> etc are all Muslims. I have seen both side, so i can understand
> somewhat where homosh is coming from, what i do not like is his utter
> insistence that being non-religious defines you as having a failed
> upbringing. Religion cannot be held entirely accountable for a view
> like that.
Yes , not entirely , but it still counts
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
I just object to
> people saying my parents are failures just because I don't believe in
> god.
Same here.
I just object to
> people saying my parents are failures just because I don't believe in
> god.
Same here.
HálloHowArtThou wrote:
> This srgument is doing nothing but going around in circles. And it
> will keep doing so.
It's been raging in the 'being a christian' thread for ages already HHAT. I'm not trying to win an arguement here, I just object to people saying my parents are failures just because I don't believe in god.
> This srgument is doing nothing but going around in circles. And it
> will keep doing so.
It's been raging in the 'being a christian' thread for ages already HHAT. I'm not trying to win an arguement here, I just object to people saying my parents are failures just because I don't believe in god.
homosh wrote:
> But non-relegious people are more likely to steal
Thats a load of balls and you know it.
> But non-relegious people are more likely to steal
Thats a load of balls and you know it.
I have the advantage here of seeing both cultures though...I was raised by a catholic grandmother but my brothers/cousins/aunts/uncles etc are all Muslims. I have seen both side, so i can understand somewhat where homosh is coming from, what i do not like is his utter insistence that being non-religious defines you as having a failed upbringing. Religion cannot be held entirely accountable for a view like that.
We'll never stop , this could be the longest thread ever if we continue !
HálloHowArtThou wrote:
> As somebody neutral in this converasation.. (I am Muslim, yet I live
> in the UK) I think that this is getting nowhere.
>
> Both of you were bought up in different cultures, and each culture is
> different. Fortunately, I've had the best-of-both worlds. A
> not-so-strict Muslim upbrginging in the UK.
>
> This srgument is doing nothing but going around in circles. And it
> will keep doing so.
I think you're right !
> As somebody neutral in this converasation.. (I am Muslim, yet I live
> in the UK) I think that this is getting nowhere.
>
> Both of you were bought up in different cultures, and each culture is
> different. Fortunately, I've had the best-of-both worlds. A
> not-so-strict Muslim upbrginging in the UK.
>
> This srgument is doing nothing but going around in circles. And it
> will keep doing so.
I think you're right !
Lindgren wrote:
> homosh wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> homosh wrote:
>
>
> There are 2 ways for the poor to find money : The legal one , which
> is by being relegious , and the illegal one by commiting crimes
>
> Legality and religion have nothing to do with each other in this
> scenario, the sooner you learn that the better
> In fact it does , illegal things would include harming people by
> killing them or stealing there money , etc.. , and relegion forbids
> these things
>
> You said the legal way was by being religious, what you described is
> being civil, any normal person religious or not, would not
> steal etc.
But non-relegious people are more likely to steal
> homosh wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> homosh wrote:
>
>
> There are 2 ways for the poor to find money : The legal one , which
> is by being relegious , and the illegal one by commiting crimes
>
> Legality and religion have nothing to do with each other in this
> scenario, the sooner you learn that the better
> In fact it does , illegal things would include harming people by
> killing them or stealing there money , etc.. , and relegion forbids
> these things
>
> You said the legal way was by being religious, what you described is
> being civil, any normal person religious or not, would not
> steal etc.
But non-relegious people are more likely to steal
Page: