The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> homosh wrote:
> Mystique wrote:
> Always being the one to cause mayhem...but what are you opinions on
> gay people?
> Should they burn in hell too?
> yes
>
> Oh!
> Chase me! Chase me!
>
> What have they done wrong exactly?
> Nothing wrong with a bit of gay luvvin to clean the pipes out.
>
> *Flops wrist*
> Has Satan got a tan?
That's disgusting
> Mystique wrote:
> Always being the one to cause mayhem...but what are you opinions on
> gay people?
> Should they burn in hell too?
> yes
Oh!
Chase me! Chase me!
What have they done wrong exactly?
Nothing wrong with a bit of gay luvvin to clean the pipes out.
*Flops wrist*
Has Satan got a tan?
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> homosh wrote:
> The whole point is about children . Suppose someone had sex with a
> poor woman , the woman becomes pregnant and the father denies it ,
> and doesn't want to raise him or give him money , pretending that
> it's not his son , but if they were married , he becomes obligated
> infront of the people and the law
>
> Haha.
> Yeah, in about 700BC.
>
> Affairs and the like?
> It might not even be his child - and if it is, he can easily ignore
> it.
> Nobody's obliged to do anything.
>
> 'A poor woman'
> Really? Are you in some kind of time warp there?
> It happens
It happened
800 years ago.
Marriage is meaningless now.
> Always being the one to cause mayhem...but what are you opinions on
> gay people?
> Should they burn in hell too?
yes
> homosh wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> homosh wrote:
> I didn't learn anything , since I still beleive in God after having
> the conversation
>
> Not everything you learn revolves around God, you know?
> What about all the scientists and gernally geniusususus - didn't
> they
> tell us anything?
>
> Or did you and 'your kind' as you put it, refuse to learn anything
> from them?
> No scientists or geniuses were mentioned in the conversation
>
> To quote you:
> "Nothing can be learn from a non-believer"
>
> I think that comment includes pretty much all non-believers.
> God, you're full of crap.
>
> And with that, I bid you goodnight.
> *Bows*
I just meant the other guy
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> homosh wrote:
> I didn't learn anything , since I still beleive in God after having
> the conversation
>
> Not everything you learn revolves around God, you know?
> What about all the scientists and gernally geniusususus - didn't
> they
> tell us anything?
>
> Or did you and 'your kind' as you put it, refuse to learn anything
> from them?
> No scientists or geniuses were mentioned in the conversation
To quote you:
"Nothing can be learn from a non-believer"
I think that comment includes pretty much all non-believers.
God, you're full of crap.
And with that, I bid you goodnight.
*Bows*
Should they burn in hell too?
> homosh wrote:
> The whole point is about children . Suppose someone had sex with a
> poor woman , the woman becomes pregnant and the father denies it ,
> and doesn't want to raise him or give him money , pretending that
> it's not his son , but if they were married , he becomes obligated
> infront of the people and the law
>
> Haha.
> Yeah, in about 700BC.
>
> Affairs and the like?
> It might not even be his child - and if it is, he can easily ignore
> it.
> Nobody's obliged to do anything.
>
> 'A poor woman'
> Really? Are you in some kind of time warp there?
It happens
> homosh wrote:
> Marriage didn't even exist for a goodly portion of our existence.
> Sex has existed forever.
> The whole point is about children . Suppose someone had sex with a
> poor woman , the woman becomes pregnant and the father denies it ,
> and doesn't want to raise him or give him money , pretending that
> it's not his son , but if they were married , he becomes obligated
> infront of the people and the law
> *****
> She could have had a daughter!!!11
>
> YOUR SEXIST YOO RR!!
Sorry about that !! hehehe