The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Aggressive tw*ts, drunks who just won’t listen, I can handle them
Immature kids who shout “pig’s”, I can put up with.
People who argue over tickets “I’ve only been here I minute”, I can deal with.
These are all everyday occurrences and ones that although they can be slightly irritating, do not make my job nasty.
A 16-year-old who is pregnant with her second kid and has been slapped around.
Indecent pictures of children.
Elderly people who’ve been robbed.
These are the things that get me down.
Immature kids who shout “pig’s”, I can put up with.
People who argue over tickets “I’ve only been here I minute”, I can deal with.
These are all everyday occurrences and ones that although they can be slightly irritating, do not make my job nasty.
A 16-year-old who is pregnant with her second kid and has been slapped around.
Indecent pictures of children.
Elderly people who’ve been robbed.
These are the things that get me down.
Page:
Flockhart wrote:
> if justice wont punish them the public will.
You'd think so wouldn't you? But these sick criminals get protection. Ian Huntley is being protected in prison when really he should be put in a cell with a sex-starved 7 foot 42 stone convict and be made to be his b**ch.
> if justice wont punish them the public will.
You'd think so wouldn't you? But these sick criminals get protection. Ian Huntley is being protected in prison when really he should be put in a cell with a sex-starved 7 foot 42 stone convict and be made to be his b**ch.
You see all of this at craylands estate + more!
I used to live there and i had gangs with knives and stuff after me!
I used to live there and i had gangs with knives and stuff after me!
If and when you have a crash without a seatbelt on, how do you think the guy that kills you is going to feel?
I think the Laws should change to be more like Saudi Arabia. Only in the areas like, if someone steals something, he will have his hand cut off.
There is no deterrence for criminals except a light sentence, so they continue to do it. The problem is getting out of control and the country seriously need to do something about it.
There is no deterrence for criminals except a light sentence, so they continue to do it. The problem is getting out of control and the country seriously need to do something about it.
Oh, of course.
Because when you're not driving it's the driver's reponsibility to make sure you've got a belt on. Therefore, you won't get it trouble for it.
Muh.
Because when you're not driving it's the driver's reponsibility to make sure you've got a belt on. Therefore, you won't get it trouble for it.
Muh.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Twistid wrote:
> You are most likely right but it is still my decision. I dont think
> a police officer has the right to tell me to wear one as this
> decision does not affect anyone else but me, and I see this as the
> basic idea of freedom?
>
> Have you seen that advert?
> When the kid kills his mum because he hasn't got a belt on in the
> back?
I meant when i drive...
> Twistid wrote:
> You are most likely right but it is still my decision. I dont think
> a police officer has the right to tell me to wear one as this
> decision does not affect anyone else but me, and I see this as the
> basic idea of freedom?
>
> Have you seen that advert?
> When the kid kills his mum because he hasn't got a belt on in the
> back?
I meant when i drive...
Twistid wrote:
> Very true, but wouldnt that be solved by legalisation?
Ahaha.
Wouldn't everything?
> Very true, but wouldnt that be solved by legalisation?
Ahaha.
Wouldn't everything?
Twistid wrote:
> You are most likely right but it is still my decision. I dont think
> a police officer has the right to tell me to wear one as this
> decision does not affect anyone else but me, and I see this as the
> basic idea of freedom?
Have you seen that advert?
When the kid kills his mum because he hasn't got a belt on in the back?
> You are most likely right but it is still my decision. I dont think
> a police officer has the right to tell me to wear one as this
> decision does not affect anyone else but me, and I see this as the
> basic idea of freedom?
Have you seen that advert?
When the kid kills his mum because he hasn't got a belt on in the back?
<---*argument goes up in smoke including stash*
your right, i dont think that seatbelt thing was a good example
your right, i dont think that seatbelt thing was a good example
Twistid, you also have to think like this.
Is it so pathetic to get people to put their seatbelts on?
When people are involved in car crashes and haven’t been wearing their belts, who is it that turns up at the scene and has to deal with what they find? The emergency services, that’s who.
Also, if all they have been doing is stopping you and telling you to put your belt on then they are showing discretion, they could have given you a £30 ticket.
If you have kids and are driving them about, would you make them put their belt on?
Is it so pathetic to get people to put their seatbelts on?
When people are involved in car crashes and haven’t been wearing their belts, who is it that turns up at the scene and has to deal with what they find? The emergency services, that’s who.
Also, if all they have been doing is stopping you and telling you to put your belt on then they are showing discretion, they could have given you a £30 ticket.
If you have kids and are driving them about, would you make them put their belt on?
Page: