Viewing Thread:
"Feeling a little fecked"

Aggressive tw*ts, drunks who just won’t listen, I can handle them
Immature kids who shout “pig’s”, I can put up with.
People who argue over tickets “I’ve only been here I minute”, I can deal with.

These are all everyday occurrences and ones that although they can be slightly irritating, do not make my job nasty.

A 16-year-old who is pregnant with her second kid and has been slapped around.
Indecent pictures of children.
Elderly people who’ve been robbed.

These are the things that get me down.

There are always mistakes, nothing can be perfect. And the chance of 1 in a 1000 might be low ubtil you become that 1.

So, your saying if every crime was solved using DNA and all the methods that we have available to us, there would be mistakes. Maybe 1 in a 1000 might be a mistake. The pros outway the cons by far.

"Let us throw open the floor to wild accusations!"
"She's a WITCH!"
"BURN HER!"

Peter Venkman wrote:
> I think the Laws should change to be more like Saudi Arabia. Only in
> the areas like, if someone steals something, he will have his hand
> cut off.
>
> There is no deterrence for criminals except a light sentence, so they
> continue to do it. The problem is getting out of control and the
> country seriously need to do something about it.

I agree with your way of thinking, ie a sex offender should have his balls cut off, but the trouble is innocent people are still convicted, and I think this would take us back to the times when innocent people were hanged for murder

VenomByte wrote:
> I think mutilation would make an excellent punishment and deterrent.
>
> Only problem of course, is the same as with the death penalty. You
> really can't afford to catch the wrong guy...

No but if they brought in these Laws, after about one year there would be no crime. The police would be redundant. Basically, Demolition Man.

ßora† SagdiyeV wrote:
> how about if we put these people into an arena or 'game area', and set
> them running. about an hour later we release professional killers,
> and take bets on who gets killed first?

Thats an arnie film. The Running Man. :-D

I think mutilation would make an excellent punishment and deterrent.

Only problem of course, is the same as with the death penalty. You really can't afford to catch the wrong guy...

how about if we put these people into an arena or 'game area', and set them running. about an hour later we release professional killers, and take bets on who gets killed first?

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Oh, of course.
> Because when you're not driving it's the driver's reponsibility to
> make sure you've got a belt on. Therefore, you won't get it trouble
> for it.
>
> Muh.

What are your talking about? I was using the seatbelt thing as an example of why I think some police officers have got their priorities wrong. However whats his name made a good arguement and has 'shown me the light'

ßora† SagdiyeV wrote:
> It sickens me to the core that they now live the life of
> VIP's.

Yep.
They *alledgedly* are taken to European football matches, Premiership matches, they were taken on holiday to New Zealand, and an array of other countries.
All at the expense of the taxpayer.