The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So i was in the bank today (yes i went out) just sorting out some cheques ect when the lady calls this man over.
"Excuse me sire can you come here a moment please"
"yes have you sorted my cheque out?"
"not not yet there is a few questions i need to ask you"
"errm like what"
"Who was this cheque from and what was the amount"
"well i cant remember exactly (The guy has a german accent)"
"ok so why did you pay this large sum of money in?"
"my job pays me in different amounts"
"Thats funny, our records show that you are currently unemployed"
"err hang on my phones ringing, damn its a bad reception"
He walks towards the door and and soon as he gets to to door he puts the phone in his pocket and legs in, 2 security guards ran after him.
Wow, the one time i go out i see some great stuff, mebbe i should go out more often.
"Excuse me sire can you come here a moment please"
"yes have you sorted my cheque out?"
"not not yet there is a few questions i need to ask you"
"errm like what"
"Who was this cheque from and what was the amount"
"well i cant remember exactly (The guy has a german accent)"
"ok so why did you pay this large sum of money in?"
"my job pays me in different amounts"
"Thats funny, our records show that you are currently unemployed"
"err hang on my phones ringing, damn its a bad reception"
He walks towards the door and and soon as he gets to to door he puts the phone in his pocket and legs in, 2 security guards ran after him.
Wow, the one time i go out i see some great stuff, mebbe i should go out more often.
Page:
Darling wrote:
> Can't you work for yourself!?
Me?
Christ, was only joking.
> Can't you work for yourself!?
Me?
Christ, was only joking.
Can't you work for yourself!?
Thank you El Robin, I'll print it out.
what is with your insessant lies?!?
How dare you, took me ages that did :D
ÈL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Now be impressed, took me a while to write that.
>
> *whistles*
good old copy and paste!
> Now be impressed, took me a while to write that.
>
> *whistles*
good old copy and paste!
Yea well ya know, it was hard remembering all that, but anything for you guys.
If you can't beat 'em join 'em eh Robbo?
Now be impressed, took me a while to write that.
*whistles*
*whistles*
It was Bowlby (1951) who argued that infants form a special relationship with their mother, which is qualitatively different from the relationship which they form with any other kind of person. Bowlby described this as the process of 'monotropy'. By a mechanism which he saw as very similar to imprinting, Bowlby considered that the young infant developed a firm attachment to its mother within the first six months of life, and that if this attachment or bond was then broken the infant would suffer serious consequences.
Bowlby's work rapidly assumed a political dimension, as his arguments were seized by the post-war pressure groups, which argued that women should stay at home and look after children full-time. The reason why this had become a sensitive political issue was because at this time there were a large number of returning servicemen, and it was considered necessary that jobs should be freed for them. Since a large number of women had worked during the war and carried on working afterwards, some people argued that they should return to full-time child-care in the home, and free their jobs for the returning servicemen. Some of the returning servicemen included lawyers who later went on to become judges. For example Lord Donaldson served with the Guards Armoured Divisional Signals in North-West Europe from 1942-45 and with the Military Government in Schleswig-Holstein before called to Bar, Middle Temple, 1946.
It is largely as a result of the work of Professor Sir Michael Rutter that it is generally accepted that the single concept of 'maternal deprivation' is misleading. Rutter also relied on the proofs of other researchers such as Newson (1974) who argued that mothering skills are not in any way innate or instinctive. Instead, they are skills, which are acquired through practice in communicating with that particular individual baby. As you get to know a baby, and see it as having human sensibilities and a 'personality', you also become more able to detect and understand that baby's responses. Babies, on their part, learn very fast, and respond more to those people who are sensitive to their actions. They are also, as Schaffer and Emerson (1964) showed, more likely to form attachments with people who respond sensitively to them. The implication here is that interacting with babies is a learned skill; and that fathers can acquire these skills just as mothers do, given motivation and opportunity.
Bowlby's work rapidly assumed a political dimension, as his arguments were seized by the post-war pressure groups, which argued that women should stay at home and look after children full-time. The reason why this had become a sensitive political issue was because at this time there were a large number of returning servicemen, and it was considered necessary that jobs should be freed for them. Since a large number of women had worked during the war and carried on working afterwards, some people argued that they should return to full-time child-care in the home, and free their jobs for the returning servicemen. Some of the returning servicemen included lawyers who later went on to become judges. For example Lord Donaldson served with the Guards Armoured Divisional Signals in North-West Europe from 1942-45 and with the Military Government in Schleswig-Holstein before called to Bar, Middle Temple, 1946.
It is largely as a result of the work of Professor Sir Michael Rutter that it is generally accepted that the single concept of 'maternal deprivation' is misleading. Rutter also relied on the proofs of other researchers such as Newson (1974) who argued that mothering skills are not in any way innate or instinctive. Instead, they are skills, which are acquired through practice in communicating with that particular individual baby. As you get to know a baby, and see it as having human sensibilities and a 'personality', you also become more able to detect and understand that baby's responses. Babies, on their part, learn very fast, and respond more to those people who are sensitive to their actions. They are also, as Schaffer and Emerson (1964) showed, more likely to form attachments with people who respond sensitively to them. The implication here is that interacting with babies is a learned skill; and that fathers can acquire these skills just as mothers do, given motivation and opportunity.
Page: