The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Untitled
Why is that cat brown?
What is wrong with you?
How are you feeling?
Is that a frown?
Who? What? Where?
Why? Can't I?
Go away.
-------
I'd pay to read the posts of anyone who can find meaning in that or at least appreciate it in any way shape or form.
Why is that cat brown?
What is wrong with you?
How are you feeling?
Is that a frown?
Who? What? Where?
Why? Can't I?
Go away.
-------
I'd pay to read the posts of anyone who can find meaning in that or at least appreciate it in any way shape or form.
Page:
Theres a thin line between thoughtful randomness and uninspired pointlessness.
I'm as yet undecided which side of that line this is on.
I'm as yet undecided which side of that line this is on.
Never heard of that game! Sounds interesting though, a little like free-association writing. You must have an imaginative mind then..!
Ms NY wrote:
> Why is that cat brown?
> What is wrong with you?
> How are you feeling?
> Is that a frown?
> Who? What? Where?
> Why? Can't I?
> Go away.
>
> -------
>
> Okee.. and back to the topic!
> Is there any meaning to it?!
>
> It seems like a very 'moody' thing.. Not sure why, it's like the
> questions you might get asked if you were quietly being down.
> And.. why is that cat brown?! I don't think I've ever seen a brown
> cat.
>
> Why not explain? ;)
Sorry Blank, not going to get drawn into a confrontation today. Too much effort when I don't wish to change my view points.
Anyway thank you for asking Ms NY. I just typed it really quickly to see what I would type. Have you ever played that game where you ask people questions really quickly and then throw in a serious question and since the object of the game is to answer quickly they quickly blurt out the truth without thinking? Well I decided to see what I would type if I just kept typing not allowing myself to stop and that came out.
Maybe it gives an insight into my thoughts at the time? I don't know. I thought if any of you could find meaning in it maybe you'd either A) Learn something you didn't know about me or B) I'd learn something I didn't know about me heh:D
> Why is that cat brown?
> What is wrong with you?
> How are you feeling?
> Is that a frown?
> Who? What? Where?
> Why? Can't I?
> Go away.
>
> -------
>
> Okee.. and back to the topic!
> Is there any meaning to it?!
>
> It seems like a very 'moody' thing.. Not sure why, it's like the
> questions you might get asked if you were quietly being down.
> And.. why is that cat brown?! I don't think I've ever seen a brown
> cat.
>
> Why not explain? ;)
Sorry Blank, not going to get drawn into a confrontation today. Too much effort when I don't wish to change my view points.
Anyway thank you for asking Ms NY. I just typed it really quickly to see what I would type. Have you ever played that game where you ask people questions really quickly and then throw in a serious question and since the object of the game is to answer quickly they quickly blurt out the truth without thinking? Well I decided to see what I would type if I just kept typing not allowing myself to stop and that came out.
Maybe it gives an insight into my thoughts at the time? I don't know. I thought if any of you could find meaning in it maybe you'd either A) Learn something you didn't know about me or B) I'd learn something I didn't know about me heh:D
Why is that cat brown?
What is wrong with you?
How are you feeling?
Is that a frown?
Who? What? Where?
Why? Can't I?
Go away.
-------
Okee.. and back to the topic!
Is there any meaning to it?!
It seems like a very 'moody' thing.. Not sure why, it's like the questions you might get asked if you were quietly being down.
And.. why is that cat brown?! I don't think I've ever seen a brown cat.
Why not explain? ;)
What is wrong with you?
How are you feeling?
Is that a frown?
Who? What? Where?
Why? Can't I?
Go away.
-------
Okee.. and back to the topic!
Is there any meaning to it?!
It seems like a very 'moody' thing.. Not sure why, it's like the questions you might get asked if you were quietly being down.
And.. why is that cat brown?! I don't think I've ever seen a brown cat.
Why not explain? ;)
Cubist V.2 wrote:
> I am not respecting them for nothing as from the moment you meet
> someone they make choices and do things that you either like or
> dislike. I feel that you have to respect their choices though
> unconditionally as it is their choice to make and I respect those
> choices.
You're still contradicting yourself! What if you *don't* respect those choices?
Why do you feel that I *have* to respect the choices another makes?
You're contradicting yourself all the time here, maybe you'll realise when you re-read this thread when it's not past your bed time.
> I am not respecting them for nothing as from the moment you meet
> someone they make choices and do things that you either like or
> dislike. I feel that you have to respect their choices though
> unconditionally as it is their choice to make and I respect those
> choices.
You're still contradicting yourself! What if you *don't* respect those choices?
Why do you feel that I *have* to respect the choices another makes?
You're contradicting yourself all the time here, maybe you'll realise when you re-read this thread when it's not past your bed time.
Cubist V.2 wrote:
> You'd be surprised how often facts are actually fiction whenever new
> evidence is found or what not.
No, what is changed is what gets written in books. Facts can never be changed, that is the definition of a fact.
> Who said my evidence came from government sources?
>
> The majority of it did.
Name one.
> Was that not done anyway?
Nothing to do with it.
> I simply proposed we save our men by using
> missiles to do it instead.
That's not what I'm getting at - the method is irrelevant. What I'm saying is your "gut" is not enough to send millions of Iraqis to their death. That's like if America bombed Saudi Arabia, and the Saudis said "Hey, my gut says the Scottish did it, let's bomb Glasgow and Edinburgh to *&$£!" it makes no sense.
> You'd be surprised how often facts are actually fiction whenever new
> evidence is found or what not.
No, what is changed is what gets written in books. Facts can never be changed, that is the definition of a fact.
> Who said my evidence came from government sources?
>
> The majority of it did.
Name one.
> Was that not done anyway?
Nothing to do with it.
> I simply proposed we save our men by using
> missiles to do it instead.
That's not what I'm getting at - the method is irrelevant. What I'm saying is your "gut" is not enough to send millions of Iraqis to their death. That's like if America bombed Saudi Arabia, and the Saudis said "Hey, my gut says the Scottish did it, let's bomb Glasgow and Edinburgh to *&$£!" it makes no sense.
Blank wrote:
> And if it is unconditional, then why mention who they are and their
> choices at all? You don't respect them for that, you respect them
> willy nilly.
I am not respecting them for nothing as from the moment you meet someone they make choices and do things that you either like or dislike. I feel that you have to respect their choices though unconditionally as it is their choice to make and I respect those choices.
Right now I am signing off heh. Bye.
> And if it is unconditional, then why mention who they are and their
> choices at all? You don't respect them for that, you respect them
> willy nilly.
I am not respecting them for nothing as from the moment you meet someone they make choices and do things that you either like or dislike. I feel that you have to respect their choices though unconditionally as it is their choice to make and I respect those choices.
Right now I am signing off heh. Bye.
Cubist V.2 wrote:
> Cubist V.2 = Signed Out
Tossser.
> Cubist V.2 = Signed Out
Tossser.
Blank wrote:
> Well, it's never happened because by definition facts cannot be
> altered. A fact is something that is true.
You'd be surprised how often facts are actually fiction whenever new evidence is found or what not.
> Who said my evidence came from government sources?
The majority of it did.
> What you said was: "The Iraqis knocked down the Twin Towers so
> we should level their cities." You proposed that we go and kill
> millions of innocent citizens based on your gut. What kind of a
> lunatic are you?
Was that not done anyway? I simply proposed we save our men by using missiles to do it instead. I still believe that Iraqis where responsible for it in the same way you can be responsible for a murder without comitting it yourself (hitman). I think in a few years time new evidence will surface and the truth will come out.
> Well, it's never happened because by definition facts cannot be
> altered. A fact is something that is true.
You'd be surprised how often facts are actually fiction whenever new evidence is found or what not.
> Who said my evidence came from government sources?
The majority of it did.
> What you said was: "The Iraqis knocked down the Twin Towers so
> we should level their cities." You proposed that we go and kill
> millions of innocent citizens based on your gut. What kind of a
> lunatic are you?
Was that not done anyway? I simply proposed we save our men by using missiles to do it instead. I still believe that Iraqis where responsible for it in the same way you can be responsible for a murder without comitting it yourself (hitman). I think in a few years time new evidence will surface and the truth will come out.
Cubist V.2 wrote:
> I never said actions weren't choices only that whether their actions
> are good or bad, whether I agree with them or not I respect whatever
> they have chosen to do.
Why? There has to be a reason for respect, and this is what you aren't grasping.
Even if the reason is just "They're doing it because it's what they believe in, and I respect that," but you aren't giving any. You're saying it is unconditional.
And if it is unconditional, then why mention who they are and their choices at all? You don't respect them for that, you respect them willy nilly.
> I never said actions weren't choices only that whether their actions
> are good or bad, whether I agree with them or not I respect whatever
> they have chosen to do.
Why? There has to be a reason for respect, and this is what you aren't grasping.
Even if the reason is just "They're doing it because it's what they believe in, and I respect that," but you aren't giving any. You're saying it is unconditional.
And if it is unconditional, then why mention who they are and their choices at all? You don't respect them for that, you respect them willy nilly.
Page: