The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Name Current Rating My Rating Reason
Ratchet and Clank 2 3+ 7+ Violence
Simpsons Road Rage 3+ 7+ Occ. Bad Language
Simpsons Wrestling 3+ 7+ Occ. Bad Language
> Galacticdramon wrote:
> Thing is, an 8-year-old could go into Woolworths and buy an 18+!
>
> I'm 19, and I went into Woolworths to buy 'The Osbournes', which is
> an 18, and they wouldn't even sell ME it.
Really, i went into woolworths (im 11) and bought the sims which is 15+.
And they sold it to me!
> Thing is, an 8-year-old could go into Woolworths and buy an 18+!
I'm 19, and I went into Woolworths to buy 'The Osbournes', which is an 18, and they wouldn't even sell ME it.
> Okay, the big vote:
>
> Do you think Age Ratings are usually useful or usually messed up?
I think if you view the game yourself and find out about it then you should be able to know if you can take the game.If u know bout sex,violence and bad language then u can probably take it.Look at me im only 11 and i got Gta2 and 3 when i was ten.And i aint turned mad,in fact according to my teacher im pretty clever.
> Okay, the big vote:
>
> Do you think Age Ratings are usually useful or usually messed up?
Age ratings are useful to parents which aren't exactly clued up on games, as it gives them a clear indication of the games content. That way you don't upset little Timmy when you get him Manhunt, and he sees brains and eyeballs being splattered all over the place.
But then again, the back of the box gives a clear indication of what the game's gonna be like anyway, so really, age ratings are there to ensure youngsters can't go in and buy games like that themselves, so it gives parents a little more control over what their kids see.
So yea, age ratings are useful.
Do you think Age Ratings are usually useful or usually messed up?
> Bmx XXX, here I come. Next game on my shelf.
I hope you're being sarcastic?
Sit all 5-year-olds down in front of GTA and makes them play it until their checklist is complete:
Decapitating - A
Drive-bys - C-
Overdosing - B
Sleeping with and / or killing prossies - A*
Avoiding arrest - A
Rampages with meat cleavers - B
Mutilating police men / firemen / paramedics - A
Car stealing and running over OAPs - C
Jimmy shows much promise with the sniper rifle, and his hatred for the pigs is at a decent level. He is prone to unprovoked outbursts with the uzi, which is always good to see, and shows good initiative with the katana.
His driving skills need improvent, however, as other students produced more blood shed.
What an idiot you are, sir.
> Cloak and Dagger wrote:
> Age ratings are crap there just to make the game makers look
> concernd
> about the children and not sales we all see it eventually in films
> or
> even real life.
>
> No. They're to stop people of 5 years old buying games like State of
> emergency, GTA or Manhunt.
But whats the point there going to see it anyway someday might aswell get used to it when there young and not get picked on in school.