The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
It all looks different.
Mu'uh
Mu'uh
Page:
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
>
> You mean it's crap then yea.
No, I mean its not ideal in my opinion. If I thought it was crap, it would mean I don't like any part of it, and thats not true.
>
> You mean it's crap then yea.
No, I mean its not ideal in my opinion. If I thought it was crap, it would mean I don't like any part of it, and thats not true.
I like the new 'Yellow Card' warning type thing, nice one SR...
P.S. your forum sucks.
:-)
P.S. your forum sucks.
:-)
Lindgren wrote:
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> A bit too bright for my liking.
>
> Come on Lindgren say it, you don't like it because it is crap.
>
> I don't think it's crap, just the bright blue writing on the topics
> index on a brilliant white background is literally an eye-sore.
> Otherwise its fine. I like the "Views" thingy.
You mean it's crap then yea.
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> A bit too bright for my liking.
>
> Come on Lindgren say it, you don't like it because it is crap.
>
> I don't think it's crap, just the bright blue writing on the topics
> index on a brilliant white background is literally an eye-sore.
> Otherwise its fine. I like the "Views" thingy.
You mean it's crap then yea.
Notice the *cough* part in that topic
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> A bit too bright for my liking.
>
> Come on Lindgren say it, you don't like it because it is crap.
I don't think it's crap, just the bright blue writing on the topics index on a brilliant white background is literally an eye-sore. Otherwise its fine. I like the "Views" thingy.
> Lindgren wrote:
> A bit too bright for my liking.
>
> Come on Lindgren say it, you don't like it because it is crap.
I don't think it's crap, just the bright blue writing on the topics index on a brilliant white background is literally an eye-sore. Otherwise its fine. I like the "Views" thingy.
Silent-Scope wrote:
> Yea that's alright (note that this is only some online forum
> afterall)
> But I am just trying to tell people to look before they post a new
> topic because there might be a topic already on the forum talking
> about the same thing because if we had everyone doing this than it
> would make this forum even more tripe as it is.
Yeah I know, but then you went and done it yourself. And the way you done it was so...stupid? I dunno. You used to type like that, so I don't see why you should take a pop at the other people who do it. Or something. I dunno. Confused. It's too early for my brain. Just leave me alone. Yeah.
> Yea that's alright (note that this is only some online forum
> afterall)
> But I am just trying to tell people to look before they post a new
> topic because there might be a topic already on the forum talking
> about the same thing because if we had everyone doing this than it
> would make this forum even more tripe as it is.
Yeah I know, but then you went and done it yourself. And the way you done it was so...stupid? I dunno. You used to type like that, so I don't see why you should take a pop at the other people who do it. Or something. I dunno. Confused. It's too early for my brain. Just leave me alone. Yeah.
Eek!
I keep on thinking the threads have gained about 100 posts since last time, but it’s just the number of views.
It’s ball-licking good. No wait, it licks balls. That’s it.
It’s ball-licking good. No wait, it licks balls. That’s it.
Its programme indeed.
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Dee Dubs wrote:
> programme.
>
> Program.
Isn't it:
TV Programme
Football Programme
Computer Program
If so...I am right. Mu'uh.
> Dee Dubs wrote:
> programme.
>
> Program.
Isn't it:
TV Programme
Football Programme
Computer Program
If so...I am right. Mu'uh.
Page: