The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
It all looks different.
Mu'uh
Mu'uh
Page:
I won't, not till the colours are changed back, (or i get one of them stupis yellow cards)
For the record, we were halfway through changing the site when a meeting was called, and by the time it had finished, we all wanted to go home. So technically, it's the change hasn't entirely been made. The navigation bit has changed but isn't live yet.
And also, anyone who complains about us changing the colours (honestly, we changed one grey colour to like one shade lighter) is official a pansy. "It burns my eyes, it burns my eyes!" Uh... blink?
Anyone who complains = Pansy.
And also, anyone who complains about us changing the colours (honestly, we changed one grey colour to like one shade lighter) is official a pansy. "It burns my eyes, it burns my eyes!" Uh... blink?
Anyone who complains = Pansy.
Stop causing civil disorder Robin.
*Im not quoting Lindgren (she might get moody)
It's crap.
It's crap.
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
>
> It would be better than the old one if they just toned down the
> colours on the main page with all the posts a little, otherwise its
> fine.
>
> It's crap.
Give it a rest Robin. I've said what I think, made it clear it's not crap by a long way in my opinion, so if you're gonna say it's crap, do it without quoting me please.
> Lindgren wrote:
>
> It would be better than the old one if they just toned down the
> colours on the main page with all the posts a little, otherwise its
> fine.
>
> It's crap.
Give it a rest Robin. I've said what I think, made it clear it's not crap by a long way in my opinion, so if you're gonna say it's crap, do it without quoting me please.
Lindgren wrote:
> It would be better than the old one if they just toned down the
> colours on the main page with all the posts a little, otherwise its
> fine.
It's crap.
> It would be better than the old one if they just toned down the
> colours on the main page with all the posts a little, otherwise its
> fine.
It's crap.
EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
>
> You mean it's crap then yea.
>
> No, I mean its not ideal in my opinion. If I thought it was crap, it
> would mean I don't like any part of it, and thats not true.
>
> It's crap.
No it isn't.
It would be better than the old one if they just toned down the colours on the main page with all the posts a little, otherwise its fine.
> Lindgren wrote:
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
>
> You mean it's crap then yea.
>
> No, I mean its not ideal in my opinion. If I thought it was crap, it
> would mean I don't like any part of it, and thats not true.
>
> It's crap.
No it isn't.
It would be better than the old one if they just toned down the colours on the main page with all the posts a little, otherwise its fine.
It looked way better the old way.
Lindgren wrote:
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
>
> You mean it's crap then yea.
>
> No, I mean its not ideal in my opinion. If I thought it was crap, it
> would mean I don't like any part of it, and thats not true.
It's crap.
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
>
> You mean it's crap then yea.
>
> No, I mean its not ideal in my opinion. If I thought it was crap, it
> would mean I don't like any part of it, and thats not true.
It's crap.
Hmm, I quite like what they've done with the topic - the yellow writing, blue background and heading emphasises what we should be reading in the first place. The only problem with the design are the topic headings; the fonts are too light for reading comfortably with. Oh, happy withthe views column as well.
Page: