The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
"What are we executing him for again?"
"He executed thousands of others."
"Ah."
It would be utterly ridiculous to execute Saddam. On a very basic level, we would be executing him for executing others. Which is, at the very least, hypocritical. How we could justify that is beyond me. Sure, you may believe in "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," but how then are you better than the person you're punishing?
On another level, we would be executing him for executing others who don't agree with his political ideology. And we don't believe in executing people who don't agree with our political ideology. So because of this, we're going to execute someone who doesn't agree with our political ideology. Way to go, assholes.
If Saddam is executed, I really will laugh hard. While I'm watching the event on rotten.com, of course.
"He executed thousands of others."
"Ah."
It would be utterly ridiculous to execute Saddam. On a very basic level, we would be executing him for executing others. Which is, at the very least, hypocritical. How we could justify that is beyond me. Sure, you may believe in "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," but how then are you better than the person you're punishing?
On another level, we would be executing him for executing others who don't agree with his political ideology. And we don't believe in executing people who don't agree with our political ideology. So because of this, we're going to execute someone who doesn't agree with our political ideology. Way to go, assholes.
If Saddam is executed, I really will laugh hard. While I'm watching the event on rotten.com, of course.
Page:
Wouldn;t that be a blatant breach of the Geneva convention?
Stick him back down that hole again, I say. And throw down a Furby you can't turn off.
The only people who will be executing him is the Iraqi people via an Iraqi court trial.
Personally, I'd like to see him on Parkinson: well-groomed in a smart suit, smoking a cigar and chatting about his life and loves... I bet he's hilarious.
Personally, I'd like to see him on Parkinson: well-groomed in a smart suit, smoking a cigar and chatting about his life and loves... I bet he's hilarious.
"What are we executing him for again?"
"He executed thousands of others."
"Ah."
It would be utterly ridiculous to execute Saddam. On a very basic level, we would be executing him for executing others. Which is, at the very least, hypocritical. How we could justify that is beyond me. Sure, you may believe in "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," but how then are you better than the person you're punishing?
On another level, we would be executing him for executing others who don't agree with his political ideology. And we don't believe in executing people who don't agree with our political ideology. So because of this, we're going to execute someone who doesn't agree with our political ideology. Way to go, assholes.
If Saddam is executed, I really will laugh hard. While I'm watching the event on rotten.com, of course.
"He executed thousands of others."
"Ah."
It would be utterly ridiculous to execute Saddam. On a very basic level, we would be executing him for executing others. Which is, at the very least, hypocritical. How we could justify that is beyond me. Sure, you may believe in "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," but how then are you better than the person you're punishing?
On another level, we would be executing him for executing others who don't agree with his political ideology. And we don't believe in executing people who don't agree with our political ideology. So because of this, we're going to execute someone who doesn't agree with our political ideology. Way to go, assholes.
If Saddam is executed, I really will laugh hard. While I'm watching the event on rotten.com, of course.
Page: