The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The original 5 were great, but really, it's gone down hill from there. Notability isn't a standard any more, it's a leaderboard. All these new notables are bringing the side down.
Maybe if you voted for people who are actually notable and not treat it like the popularity contest that it has turned in to?
Maybe if you voted for people who are actually notable and not treat it like the popularity contest that it has turned in to?
Page:
Edgy wrote:
> Do you think that now that I ain't been in contact over MSN with so
> many people, haven't been such an active member of the forums and
> haven't done anything of comical value outside of my reviews for a
> while, that I'd be one of the top voted people if I wasn't a Notable
> now?
But to be honest Edgy I was so shocked to hear you became a Notable I nearly fell off my seat. You used to be my little under study... I leave you alone for 5 minutes and look what you do.
Get a crap name colour.
Out of order.
Active members of the forums are therefore active members of the forums. I doubt I got any votes at this election and frankly I do not care, yet I am here EVERY night... I post some clever GAD attempt everyweek that I spend much time thinking about... as well as having certain attitudes to certain user members and remembering that attitude. Am I an active member? Hell yes. Do I deserve to be a notable? No.
Does anyone? No?
Are the notables still active members of the forums?
If Notables are active members and good writers then surly Notables can be decided by the posts/word count/GAD chart?
Doesn't work like that... it was always a popularity contest.
> Do you think that now that I ain't been in contact over MSN with so
> many people, haven't been such an active member of the forums and
> haven't done anything of comical value outside of my reviews for a
> while, that I'd be one of the top voted people if I wasn't a Notable
> now?
But to be honest Edgy I was so shocked to hear you became a Notable I nearly fell off my seat. You used to be my little under study... I leave you alone for 5 minutes and look what you do.
Get a crap name colour.
Out of order.
Active members of the forums are therefore active members of the forums. I doubt I got any votes at this election and frankly I do not care, yet I am here EVERY night... I post some clever GAD attempt everyweek that I spend much time thinking about... as well as having certain attitudes to certain user members and remembering that attitude. Am I an active member? Hell yes. Do I deserve to be a notable? No.
Does anyone? No?
Are the notables still active members of the forums?
If Notables are active members and good writers then surly Notables can be decided by the posts/word count/GAD chart?
Doesn't work like that... it was always a popularity contest.
Now did I not say this over 2 years ago?
I think I did.
And was I not right?
I think I am.
And did you all shout at me and put me down making me not relate to the Notable game ever again?
I think you did.
And why am I here?
Good question.
I think I did.
And was I not right?
I think I am.
And did you all shout at me and put me down making me not relate to the Notable game ever again?
I think you did.
And why am I here?
Good question.
Not even a popularity contest now.
It's a sheep contest.
Kyz22 (whatever happened to him, I miss him) proved that to us. He got a few people who voted for him and then the entire forum followed like sheep. Same with Microchips. They just pick one person out of the top two and vote them.
It should be like a secret ballot. Go back one stage to a popularity contest, then we can progress from there.
It's a sheep contest.
Kyz22 (whatever happened to him, I miss him) proved that to us. He got a few people who voted for him and then the entire forum followed like sheep. Same with Microchips. They just pick one person out of the top two and vote them.
It should be like a secret ballot. Go back one stage to a popularity contest, then we can progress from there.
Timmargh wrote:
> Mattribute wrote:
> Jolie?
>
> Semi-naked?
>
> With a bit of lesbianism throw in for good measure.
>
> Nice baps.
*runs to rent film*
> Mattribute wrote:
> Jolie?
>
> Semi-naked?
>
> With a bit of lesbianism throw in for good measure.
>
> Nice baps.
*runs to rent film*
I could kill...
Turbonutter wrote:
> djerrud_Quince wrote:
> It is just a popularity contest. It always was.
>
> Wrong.
It may not have been the first couple of times, but now it is just a popularity contest.
Do you think that now that I ain't been in contact over MSN with so many people, haven't been such an active member of the forums and haven't done anything of comical value outside of my reviews for a while, that I'd be one of the top voted people if I wasn't a Notable now?
> djerrud_Quince wrote:
> It is just a popularity contest. It always was.
>
> Wrong.
It may not have been the first couple of times, but now it is just a popularity contest.
Do you think that now that I ain't been in contact over MSN with so many people, haven't been such an active member of the forums and haven't done anything of comical value outside of my reviews for a while, that I'd be one of the top voted people if I wasn't a Notable now?
Oh, dear. I could loan you a tape of it but it goes fuzzy in all the good places ...
Matt missed! ARGH!
Mattribute wrote:
> Jolie?
>
> Semi-naked?
With a bit of lesbianism throw in for good measure.
Nice baps.
> Jolie?
>
> Semi-naked?
With a bit of lesbianism throw in for good measure.
Nice baps.
Jolie?
Semi-naked?
NOOOOOO
Semi-naked?
NOOOOOO
Page: