The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Mario and Luigi'.
I am going on a bit of a buying session at the weekend & was looking for some games. Wot games are currently worth getting?
Page:
TaMi-Jr wrote:
> oh dear. was pikmin 2 too difficult for u? do u have the word
> "noob" stamped on your forehead? i thought as much.
Coming from a noob himself.
Easiest argument to win ever, AJ :)
> oh dear. was pikmin 2 too difficult for u? do u have the word
> "noob" stamped on your forehead? i thought as much.
Coming from a noob himself.
Easiest argument to win ever, AJ :)
AfroJoe wrote:
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> oh dear. was pikmin 2 too difficult for u? do u have the word
> "noob" stamped on your forehead? i thought as much.
>
> ...
>
> If you can point out where I said Pikmin 2 was too difficult for me,
> then I'll happily admit that you've won this argument. The thing is,
> however, I never said anything of the sort. You've just formed your
> last post on the assumption that I found Pikmin 2 difficult, which
> 1.) is wrong, and 2.) shows that you have difficulty understanding
> what in reality are fairly simplistic points.
>
> When you've decided that you're not going to be a complete and utter
> retard, feel free to try and debate my point properly.
debate? why the hell would i want to "debate" with you about computer games? why did u assume that? not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok? thx. and im not saying pikmin 2 isn't a good game. but there are far better games out there.
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> oh dear. was pikmin 2 too difficult for u? do u have the word
> "noob" stamped on your forehead? i thought as much.
>
> ...
>
> If you can point out where I said Pikmin 2 was too difficult for me,
> then I'll happily admit that you've won this argument. The thing is,
> however, I never said anything of the sort. You've just formed your
> last post on the assumption that I found Pikmin 2 difficult, which
> 1.) is wrong, and 2.) shows that you have difficulty understanding
> what in reality are fairly simplistic points.
>
> When you've decided that you're not going to be a complete and utter
> retard, feel free to try and debate my point properly.
debate? why the hell would i want to "debate" with you about computer games? why did u assume that? not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok? thx. and im not saying pikmin 2 isn't a good game. but there are far better games out there.
TaMi-Jr wrote:
> debate? why the hell would i want to "debate" with you
> about computer games? why did u assume that?
Ahahahaha.
Because you're on a discussion forum for games, hove.
> im not saying pikmin 2 isn't a good game. but there are far better
> games out there.
Y'see? You're debating computer games. Moronically and cackhandedly yes, but the hypocrisy remains nonetheless.
> debate? why the hell would i want to "debate" with you
> about computer games? why did u assume that?
Ahahahaha.
Because you're on a discussion forum for games, hove.
> im not saying pikmin 2 isn't a good game. but there are far better
> games out there.
Y'see? You're debating computer games. Moronically and cackhandedly yes, but the hypocrisy remains nonetheless.
Tphi wrote:
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> debate? why the hell would i want to "debate" with you
> about computer games? why did u assume that?
>
> Ahahahaha.
>
> Because you're on a discussion forum for games, hove.
>
> im not saying pikmin 2 isn't a good game. but there are far better
> games out there.
>
> Y'see? You're debating computer games. Moronically and cackhandedly
> yes, but the hypocrisy remains nonetheless.
tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums. disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you would realise that.
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> debate? why the hell would i want to "debate" with you
> about computer games? why did u assume that?
>
> Ahahahaha.
>
> Because you're on a discussion forum for games, hove.
>
> im not saying pikmin 2 isn't a good game. but there are far better
> games out there.
>
> Y'see? You're debating computer games. Moronically and cackhandedly
> yes, but the hypocrisy remains nonetheless.
tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums. disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you would realise that.
TaMi-Jr wrote:
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
Heheh. Well yes I am well proud! I told all my mates you see! Oh, the 7000th post celebrations were a night to remember! Face it, if you could actualy debate on here you would.
TaMi-Jr wrote:
> not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums
> to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok?
Now run along back to "having fun", presumably by calling AJ a noob. *Wipes tear from eye* You're so funny.
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
Heheh. Well yes I am well proud! I told all my mates you see! Oh, the 7000th post celebrations were a night to remember! Face it, if you could actualy debate on here you would.
TaMi-Jr wrote:
> not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums
> to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok?
Now run along back to "having fun", presumably by calling AJ a noob. *Wipes tear from eye* You're so funny.
Tphi wrote:
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
>
> Heheh. Well yes I am well proud! I told all my mates you see! Oh, the
> 7000th post celebrations were a night to remember! Face it, if you
> could actualy debate on here you would.
>
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums
> to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok?
>
> Now run along back to "having fun", presumably by calling
> AJ a noob. *Wipes tear from eye* You're so funny.
Poobumz
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
>
> Heheh. Well yes I am well proud! I told all my mates you see! Oh, the
> 7000th post celebrations were a night to remember! Face it, if you
> could actualy debate on here you would.
>
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums
> to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok?
>
> Now run along back to "having fun", presumably by calling
> AJ a noob. *Wipes tear from eye* You're so funny.
Poobumz
Tphi wrote:
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
>
> Heheh. Well yes I am well proud! I told all my mates you see! Oh, the
> 7000th post celebrations were a night to remember! Face it, if you
> could actualy debate on here you would.
>
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums
> to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok?
>
> Now run along back to "having fun", presumably by calling
> AJ a noob. *Wipes tear from eye* You're so funny.
not as funny as that pic of u cakeface =)
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
>
> Heheh. Well yes I am well proud! I told all my mates you see! Oh, the
> 7000th post celebrations were a night to remember! Face it, if you
> could actualy debate on here you would.
>
> TaMi-Jr wrote:
> not everybody is as sad you on here afrojoe. i come to these forums
> to have fun and calling you a noob amuses me. ok?
>
> Now run along back to "having fun", presumably by calling
> AJ a noob. *Wipes tear from eye* You're so funny.
not as funny as that pic of u cakeface =)
TaMi-Jr wrote:
> loads of quoted stuff, then..
>
> not as funny as that pic of u cakeface =)
Hmm.
*Re-scans your one line post for anything remotely insulting*
Noope. Anyone else?
> loads of quoted stuff, then..
>
> not as funny as that pic of u cakeface =)
Hmm.
*Re-scans your one line post for anything remotely insulting*
Noope. Anyone else?
Paper Mario's a bit of alright...
TaMi-Jr wrote:
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
Back down. We're the regulars/notables here, you're the new guy. We set the tone, we have done for years now, you don't. I'm not going to get into a wider debate about who's right/who's a newbie etc with you, but it's common etiquette to toe the line on an internet forum when you're new, so please don't dictate to those that have been on this forum since it opened how to post here.
Also, regarding your point about Pikmin 2, it's a family game, not a childs game. It is a game suitable for children and adults - my 25 year old girlfriend plays my copy, and when I find the time I'll give it a go myself.
> tphi can u read the link above?? ukchatforums not ukdebateforums.
> disscussion doesn't necessarily imply a debate/argument. u would
> think after 7000 posts (which btw u must be really proud of) you
> would realise that.
Back down. We're the regulars/notables here, you're the new guy. We set the tone, we have done for years now, you don't. I'm not going to get into a wider debate about who's right/who's a newbie etc with you, but it's common etiquette to toe the line on an internet forum when you're new, so please don't dictate to those that have been on this forum since it opened how to post here.
Also, regarding your point about Pikmin 2, it's a family game, not a childs game. It is a game suitable for children and adults - my 25 year old girlfriend plays my copy, and when I find the time I'll give it a go myself.
Page: