The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
And as expected, no new details.
May the internet be quiet of Megaton guff once more.
May the internet be quiet of Megaton guff once more.
Page:
gerrid wrote:
> Well that's great but he still doesn't actually say anything useful or
> interesting, really, does he?
Tphi wrote:
> And as expected, no new details.
> Well that's great but he still doesn't actually say anything useful or
> interesting, really, does he?
Tphi wrote:
> And as expected, no new details.
Well that's great but he still doesn't actually say anything useful or interesting, really, does he?
Various things.. "Why wasn't Mario 128 there when you promised it would be? Does it even exist? When will Nintendo show Revolution? Will there be enough 3rd Party support this time as Cube didn't have enough?"
It's very reassuring watching as he actually seems to know what's going on, which is not the feeling I've been getting of late.
It's very reassuring watching as he actually seems to know what's going on, which is not the feeling I've been getting of late.
but yeah Reggie knows what he's doing. I think it's great that the other two didn't turn up because of him. What sort of questions was he getting?
"One thing we want to make sure that we don't do is have too many games of the same type or genre"
oh my god
oh my god
Heh I'm now watching the conference streaming from GameSpot.. it was supposed to be a roundtable but when Sony and MS heard Reggie would be there they didn't turn up :)
Anyways, it's an interesting watch, and when Reggie offered to take questions from the crowd.. pretty brave as some of the questions weren't easy.
And he's saying the opposite of Shigsy.. lots of 3rd Party support for Rev.
Anyways, it's an interesting watch, and when Reggie offered to take questions from the crowd.. pretty brave as some of the questions weren't easy.
And he's saying the opposite of Shigsy.. lots of 3rd Party support for Rev.
well it didn't work that well, did it? We had 3 launch games and then nothing for 3 months.
gerrid wrote:
> Tphi wrote:
> Someone's chatting to me now who's followed the E3 conferences
> longer
> than I have has said Nintendo did the same in 2000.
>
> And look how well it worked!!!
In that the Cube was hyped at the time, yes.
If you're just talking about how the Cube worked in the long-term, well that's something different.
> Tphi wrote:
> Someone's chatting to me now who's followed the E3 conferences
> longer
> than I have has said Nintendo did the same in 2000.
>
> And look how well it worked!!!
In that the Cube was hyped at the time, yes.
If you're just talking about how the Cube worked in the long-term, well that's something different.
my press conference was better
Tphi wrote:
> Reggie says Nintendo will show the Revolution's controller when Sony
> and Microsoft have their specs locked down so they cannot steal the
> idea!
oh dear
> Reggie says there is a need for the Revolution "to combine the
> original NES, SNES, N64, and Gamecube controllers into one
> interface".
mate, the NES controller was a rectangle with a couple of buttons.
> Reggie says Nintendo will show the Revolution's controller when Sony
> and Microsoft have their specs locked down so they cannot steal the
> idea!
oh dear
> Reggie says there is a need for the Revolution "to combine the
> original NES, SNES, N64, and Gamecube controllers into one
> interface".
mate, the NES controller was a rectangle with a couple of buttons.
Page: